Amid rising global uncertainty and a noticeable slowdown in the property market, the Maharashtra government has decided to&nbsp;keep Ready Reckoner (RR) rates unchanged for the financial year 2026–27, a move expected to provide much-needed relief to both homebuyers and developers. The decision comes against the backdrop of escalating geopolitical tensions, particularly the ongoing US-Iran conflict, which has had a cascading impact on global markets. With concerns around inflation, rising construction costs, and cautious investor sentiment, the state has opted for a status quo approach rather than increasing property valuations.&nbsp;Ready Reckoner rates, which are the government’s benchmark values for properties, are used to calculate stamp duty and registration charges during transactions. Any increase in these rates directly raises the cost of buying property. By holding these rates steady, the government has ensured that there is no additional financial burden on buyers at a time when affordability remains a key concern.&nbsp;The move is also being seen as a response to signals from the real estate sector, where demand has shown signs of moderation in recent months. Developers and industry stakeholders had been urging the government to avoid a hike, warning that higher RR rates could dampen buyer sentiment and slow down sales further.&nbsp;This decision marks a shift from last year, when RR rates were revised upward by an average of around 4 percent across the state, including key markets like Mumbai, Pune, and Thane. While the earlier hike was aimed at boosting government revenue, the current stance indicates a greater focus on maintaining market stability. Experts believe the unchanged rates will help sustain transaction volumes and support the mid-income housing segment, which is particularly sensitive to price fluctuations. It may also encourage fence-sitting buyers to move ahead with their purchase decisions, especially in urban centres where property prices are already high.&nbsp;

Global tensions, market slowdown: Maharashtra holds property rates steady

Amid rising global uncertainty and a noticeable slowdown in the property market, the Maharashtra government has decided to keep Ready Reckoner (RR) rates unchanged for the financial year 2026–27, a move expected to provide much-needed relief to both homebuyers and developers. The decision comes against the backdrop of escalating geopolitical tensions, particularly the ongoing US-Iran conflict, which has had a cascading impact on global markets. With concerns around inflation, rising construction costs, and cautious investor sentiment, the state has opted for a status quo approach rather than increasing property valuations. Ready Reckoner rates, which are the government’s benchmark values for properties, are used to calculate stamp duty and registration charges during transactions. Any increase in these rates directly raises the cost of buying property. By holding these rates steady, the government has ensured that there is no additional financial burden on buyers at a time when affordability remains a key concern. The move is also being seen as a response to signals from the real estate sector, where demand has shown signs of moderation in recent months. Developers and industry stakeholders had been urging the government to avoid a hike, warning that higher RR rates could dampen buyer sentiment and slow down sales further. This decision marks a shift from last year, when RR rates were revised upward by an average of around 4 percent across the state, including key markets like Mumbai, Pune, and Thane. While the earlier hike was aimed at boosting government revenue, the current stance indicates a greater focus on maintaining market stability. Experts believe the unchanged rates will help sustain transaction volumes and support the mid-income housing segment, which is particularly sensitive to price fluctuations. It may also encourage fence-sitting buyers to move ahead with their purchase decisions, especially in urban centres where property prices are already high.

The decision comes against the backdrop of escalating geopolitical tensions, particularly the ongoing US-Iran conflict, which has had a cascading impact on global markets

Iran’s elite military force, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), warned on Tuesday (March 31) that it will target American companies across West Asia and the Gulf if further Iranian leaders are killed in what it calls ‘targeted assassinations’. The IRGC named 18 major firms, including Microsoft, Google, Apple, Intel, IBM, Tesla, Boeing, Dell Technologies, HP, Cisco, Oracle, Meta, JPMorgan Chase, and General Electric. It stated that any attack on Iranian figures would be met with retaliation against these companies’ regional operations.&nbsp;“These companies should expect destruction of their facilities in response to each act of terror in Iran,” the statement said, adding that attacks could begin from 8 pm Tehran time on April 1. Employees were urged to leave workplaces immediately for safety. The IRGC emphasized that tech and AI companies are directly involved in planning operations against Iran, making them legitimate targets.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pete-hegseth-names-3-air-force-captains-who-survived-kuwaiti-friendly-fire-1774969104060">'They never left': Pete Hegseth names 3 Air Force captains who survived Kuwaiti friendly fire</a>&nbsp;The warning follows confirmation of another high-profile killing. Brigadier General Jamshid Eshaghi, head of budget and financial affairs at Iran’s armed forces general staff, was reportedly killed in a US-Israeli strike along with members of his family. IRGC commander-in-chief Ahmad Vahidi praised Eshaghi’s contributions to strengthening Iran’s defense capabilities. Eshaghi had been sanctioned by the US in 2025 for allegedly helping route oil shipments to China and funding regional proxy groups such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/italy-s-pm-giorgia-meloni-seeks-to-revive-her-political-fortunes-with-new-electoral-reforms-1774971913937/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/italy-s-pm-giorgia-meloni-seeks-to-revive-her-political-fortunes-with-new-electoral-reforms-1774971913937/embed</a>&nbsp;Eshaghi is the latest senior Iranian official reported killed amid escalating conflict, which has already claimed several top figures in recent weeks.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

'Expect destruction': IRGC threatens attacks on US firms in Gulf after Iran leader killings. Which companies are on the target list

Iran’s elite military force, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), warned on Tuesday (March 31) that it will target American companies across West Asia and the Gulf if further Iranian leaders are killed in what it calls ‘targeted assassinations’. The IRGC named 18 major firms, including Microsoft, Google, Apple, Intel, IBM, Tesla, Boeing, Dell Technologies, HP, Cisco, Oracle, Meta, JPMorgan Chase, and General Electric. It stated that any attack on Iranian figures would be met with retaliation against these companies’ regional operations. “These companies should expect destruction of their facilities in response to each act of terror in Iran,” the statement said, adding that attacks could begin from 8 pm Tehran time on April 1. Employees were urged to leave workplaces immediately for safety. The IRGC emphasized that tech and AI companies are directly involved in planning operations against Iran, making them legitimate targets. Also Read: 'They never left': Pete Hegseth names 3 Air Force captains who survived Kuwaiti friendly fire The warning follows confirmation of another high-profile killing. Brigadier General Jamshid Eshaghi, head of budget and financial affairs at Iran’s armed forces general staff, was reportedly killed in a US-Israeli strike along with members of his family. IRGC commander-in-chief Ahmad Vahidi praised Eshaghi’s contributions to strengthening Iran’s defense capabilities. Eshaghi had been sanctioned by the US in 2025 for allegedly helping route oil shipments to China and funding regional proxy groups such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis. https://www.wionews.com/videos/italy-s-pm-giorgia-meloni-seeks-to-revive-her-political-fortunes-with-new-electoral-reforms-1774971913937/embed Eshaghi is the latest senior Iranian official reported killed amid escalating conflict, which has already claimed several top figures in recent weeks. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

IRGC threatens US companies in the Gulf with attacks from April 1 after Iranian leaders’ killings, naming major technology and industrial giants

'Expect destruction': IRGC threatens attacks on US firms in Gulf after Iran leader killings. Which companies are on target list

China and Pakistan on Tuesday (March 31) jointly unveiled a 5-point proposal aimed at restoring peace and stability in the Gulf and the wider West Asia region, calling for an immediate cessation of hostilities and a renewed push for diplomacy. The proposal was put forward during talks in Beijing between Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Mohammad Ishaq Dar, as tensions continue to escalate across the region.&nbsp;In a joint statement issued after the meeting, China and Pakistan outlined a five-point framework centred on de-escalation, dialogue, and adherence to international law. At the top of the proposal is a call for the immediate cessation of hostilities, with both countries urging all parties to prevent further escalation and allow humanitarian assistance to reach affected populations.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-if-iran-is-wise-they-ll-cut-a-deal-hegseth-claims-regime-change-has-occurred-in-tehran-1774960240668">'If Iran is wise, it will cut a deal': Hegseth claims regime change in Tehran</a>&nbsp;The second point stresses the need for the early launch of peace talks, with both sides emphasising that dialogue and diplomacy remain the only viable path to resolving disputes. The proposal also underlines the importance of respecting the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and national independence of countries in the region.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">PR No.85/2026 Five-Point Initiative of China and Pakistan for Restoring Peace and Stability in the Gulf and Middle East Region (Beijing, March 31,2026) <a href="https://t.co/JAkSsro17a">pic.twitter.com/JAkSsro17a</a>&mdash; Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Pakistan (@ForeignOfficePk) <a href="https://twitter.com/ForeignOfficePk/status/2038982374516793580?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 31, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

A key element of the framework is the protection of civilians and non-military targets. China and Pakistan called on all parties to strictly adhere to international humanitarian law and halt attacks on civilian infrastructure, including critical facilities such as energy plants, desalination units, and nuclear installations used for peaceful purposes.&nbsp;The proposal also highlights concerns over maritime security, particularly in the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz. Both countries urged measures to ensure the safety of shipping lanes, calling for the protection of commercial vessels and crew, and the restoration of normal navigation through the route as soon as possible.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/washington-vs-nato-poland-france-and-italy-push-back-on-us-war-demands-1774959396573">Washington vs NATO: Poland, France and Italy push back on US war demands</a>&nbsp;Finally, the two sides emphasised the primacy of the United Nations Charter, advocating for stronger multilateral cooperation and a comprehensive peace framework grounded in international law. They called for collective efforts to reinforce the role of the UN in facilitating a lasting resolution to the crisis.&nbsp;The joint initiative comes amid growing global concern over the potential for wider conflict in the Gulf and West Asia, with disruptions to energy supplies and maritime trade routes already raising economic and security alarms worldwide.&nbsp;

China and Pakistan proposed a five-point peace framework for the Gulf, emphasising an immediate ceasefire, diplomatic dialogue, civilian protection, maritime security in the Strait of Hormuz, and adherence to UN law.

China and Pakistan on Tuesday (March 31) jointly unveiled a 5-point proposal aimed at restoring peace and stability in the Gulf and the wider West Asia region, calling for an immediate cessation of hostilities and a renewed push for diplomacy. The proposal was put forward during talks in Beijing between Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Mohammad Ishaq Dar, as tensions continue to escalate across the region. In a joint statement issued after the meeting, China and Pakistan outlined a five-point framework centred on de-escalation, dialogue, and adherence to international law. At the top of the proposal is a call for the immediate cessation of hostilities, with both countries urging all parties to prevent further escalation and allow humanitarian assistance to reach affected populations. Also read: 'If Iran is wise, it will cut a deal': Hegseth claims regime change in Tehran The second point stresses the need for the early launch of peace talks, with both sides emphasising that dialogue and diplomacy remain the only viable path to resolving disputes. The proposal also underlines the importance of respecting the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and national independence of countries in the region.

China and Pakistan proposed a five-point peace framework for the Gulf, emphasising an immediate ceasefire, diplomatic dialogue, civilian protection, maritime security in the Strait of Hormuz, and adherence to UN law.

China, Pakistan put forward 5-point proposal for Gulf and West Asia amid Iran war. Here’s what it says

As the US-Israel war against Iran enters its second month, US President Donald Trump has reignited controversy with remarks suggesting Washington could “take the oil” in Iran. The statement came amid escalating tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran has effectively blockaded for weeks, disrupting global energy flows.&nbsp;On Monday (March 30), Trump also threatened to target Iran’s energy infrastructure - including oil wells - if Tehran does not reopen the vital shipping route. However, the feasibility and implications of such a move remain deeply contested.<h2>A major global energy player</h2>Iran is one of the world’s most resource-rich energy producers. As per the US Energy Information Administration, the country holds the third-largest proven crude oil reserves globally and the second-largest natural gas reserves.&nbsp;With approximately 157 billion barrels of proven crude oil, Iran accounts for roughly 12 per cent of global reserves and nearly a quarter of those in the Middle East. It produces about 3.3 million barrels of crude oil per day, making it a key member of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-lot-of-people-on-target-who-are-key-figures-steering-iran-through-crisis-as-us-says-many-are-on-its-list-1774961836197">‘Lot of people on target’: Who are key figures steering Iran through crisis as US says many are on its list?</a>&nbsp;Before the current conflict, Iran exported around two million barrels of oil and refined fuels daily. However, exports have fluctuated sharply since the US reimposed sanctions in 2018 following its withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, originally signed under former US President Barack Obama in 2015.<h2>Can US actually seize Iran’s oil?</h2>Despite Trump’s rhetoric, experts say that “taking” Iranian oil is far from straightforward. Reports suggest the Pentagon is preparing limited ground operations, potentially targeting strategic locations such as Kharg Island, Iran’s main oil export hub.&nbsp;However, even a successful operation there would not grant the US control over Iran’s oil reserves. Oil extraction depends on extensive infrastructure across mainland Iran, including wells, pipelines and refineries. To truly control Iranian oil, the US would need to occupy large parts of the country, a scenario that would amount to a full-scale invasion, with significant military, political and economic risks.<h2>Economic stakes and global impact</h2>Iran’s economy is heavily tied to its energy sector. In 2023, the country’s GDP stood at about $457.5 billion, with net oil export revenues estimated at $53 billion, roughly 12 per cent of its economic output. If the US were somehow able to seize Iranian oil and lift sanctions, it could increase global supply and potentially drive down prices. However, such a move would likely trigger severe geopolitical backlash and prolonged instability in the region.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-if-iran-is-wise-they-ll-cut-a-deal-hegseth-claims-regime-change-has-occurred-in-tehran-1774960240668">'If Iran is wise, it will cut a deal': Hegseth claims regime change in Tehran</a>&nbsp;The ongoing conflict has already rattled markets. Benchmark Brent crude surged to around $116 per barrel this week, compared to roughly $65 before the war began, underscoring the sensitivity of global oil prices to tensions in the Gulf.<h2>A troubled history</h2>US interest in Iranian oil is not new. In 1953, the CIA backed a coup that overthrew Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh after he nationalised the British-controlled Anglo-Iranian Oil Company.&nbsp;The operation, known as Operation Ajax, restored the rule of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and remains a defining moment in Iran’s fraught relationship with the West. Today, Trump’s comments risk reopening old wounds and raising new questions about whether military power can ever translate into control over one of the world’s most strategic resources.

President Trump’s threat to seize Iranian oil amid a Strait of Hormuz blockade faces severe military hurdles, risking global price hikes and echoing the 1953 coup’s contentious geopolitical legacy.

As the US-Israel war against Iran enters its second month, US President Donald Trump has reignited controversy with remarks suggesting Washington could “take the oil” in Iran. The statement came amid escalating tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran has effectively blockaded for weeks, disrupting global energy flows. On Monday (March 30), Trump also threatened to target Iran’s energy infrastructure - including oil wells - if Tehran does not reopen the vital shipping route. However, the feasibility and implications of such a move remain deeply contested. A major global energy player Iran is one of the world’s most resource-rich energy producers. As per the US Energy Information Administration, the country holds the third-largest proven crude oil reserves globally and the second-largest natural gas reserves. With approximately 157 billion barrels of proven crude oil, Iran accounts for roughly 12 per cent of global reserves and nearly a quarter of those in the Middle East. It produces about 3.3 million barrels of crude oil per day, making it a key member of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. Also read: ‘Lot of people on target’: Who are key figures steering Iran through crisis as US says many are on its list? Before the current conflict, Iran exported around two million barrels of oil and refined fuels daily. However, exports have fluctuated sharply since the US reimposed sanctions in 2018 following its withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, originally signed under former US President Barack Obama in 2015. Can US actually seize Iran’s oil? Despite Trump’s rhetoric, experts say that “taking” Iranian oil is far from straightforward. Reports suggest the Pentagon is preparing limited ground operations, potentially targeting strategic locations such as Kharg Island, Iran’s main oil export hub. However, even a successful operation there would not grant the US control over Iran’s oil reserves. Oil extraction depends on extensive infrastructure across mainland Iran, including wells, pipelines and refineries. To truly control Iranian oil, the US would need to occupy large parts of the country, a scenario that would amount to a full-scale invasion, with significant military, political and economic risks. Economic stakes and global impact Iran’s economy is heavily tied to its energy sector. In 2023, the country’s GDP stood at about $457.5 billion, with net oil export revenues estimated at $53 billion, roughly 12 per cent of its economic output. If the US were somehow able to seize Iranian oil and lift sanctions, it could increase global supply and potentially drive down prices. However, such a move would likely trigger severe geopolitical backlash and prolonged instability in the region. Also read: 'If Iran is wise, it will cut a deal': Hegseth claims regime change in Tehran The ongoing conflict has already rattled markets. Benchmark Brent crude surged to around $116 per barrel this week, compared to roughly $65 before the war began, underscoring the sensitivity of global oil prices to tensions in the Gulf. A troubled history US interest in Iranian oil is not new. In 1953, the CIA backed a coup that overthrew Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh after he nationalised the British-controlled Anglo-Iranian Oil Company. The operation, known as Operation Ajax, restored the rule of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and remains a defining moment in Iran’s fraught relationship with the West. Today, Trump’s comments risk reopening old wounds and raising new questions about whether military power can ever translate into control over one of the world’s most strategic resources.

President Trump’s threat to seize Iranian oil amid a Strait of Hormuz blockade faces severe military hurdles, risking global price hikes and echoing the 1953 coup’s contentious geopolitical legacy.

Can Trump ‘take’ Iran’s oil? Here’s what would happen if he does so

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt responded to the message of Pope Leo XIV, who condemned the use of religion to justify war. Karoline Leavitt defended the US President and military leaders, saying that there is nothing wrong to call US people to pray for the service member. She asserted that “it is a noble thing to do.” This comes as a response to the statement of Pope Leo XIV that God “does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war.”Defending Karoline Leavitt, he said, “I think our nation was a nation founded, 250 years ago almost, on Judeo-Christian values. And we’ve seen presidents, we’ve seen the leaders of the Department of War, and we’ve seen our troops go to prayer during the most turbulent times in our nation’s history.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/ghalibaf-trump-fake-news-iran-us-war-warning-1774953677005">Iran's Ghalibaf slams Trump calls pre-market 'news' a 'pump' and 'dump' scheme</a>Leo said that Christ did not engage in any war, nor did he defend himself. &nbsp;"This is our God... A God who refuses war... who does not listen to the prayer of those who wage war," said Pope Leo during Palm Sunday homily. The 70-year-old pontiff had been cautious with his statement; he did not mention any leaders but expressed desire for peace and concern for Christian lives. He said that more than a million people had been forced to flee their homes and urged the warring parties to engage in peace.&nbsp;US officials have been accused of invoking religious language in support of the military campaign. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, in a prayer service on Pentagon, reportedly called for “overwhelming violence of action” against US enemies. A similar rhetoric is being used by Russia by framing the war in Ukraine as a “Holy War” against Western corruption. The same is also being used in Israel, where a faction of Jewish believers are looking forward to the return of the messiah, a future Jewish King and a direct descendant of King David. Ironically, each of the three Abrahamic religion has almost similar eschatology where there is a return of Christ/ Isa and the twelfth Imam Mahdi to defeat the Antichrist/Dajjal in the war of Gog and Magog. &nbsp;

White House defends Trump’s call to pray for US troops after Pope Leo XIV condemns using religion to justify war, urging peace amid global conflicts.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt responded to the message of Pope Leo XIV, who condemned the use of religion to justify war. Karoline Leavitt defended the US President and military leaders, saying that there is nothing wrong to call US people to pray for the service member. She asserted that “it is a noble thing to do.” This comes as a response to the statement of Pope Leo XIV that God “does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war.” Defending Karoline Leavitt, he said, “I think our nation was a nation founded, 250 years ago almost, on Judeo-Christian values. And we’ve seen presidents, we’ve seen the leaders of the Department of War, and we’ve seen our troops go to prayer during the most turbulent times in our nation’s history.” Also Read: Iran's Ghalibaf slams Trump calls pre-market 'news' a 'pump' and 'dump' scheme Leo said that Christ did not engage in any war, nor did he defend himself. "This is our God... A God who refuses war... who does not listen to the prayer of those who wage war," said Pope Leo during Palm Sunday homily. The 70-year-old pontiff had been cautious with his statement; he did not mention any leaders but expressed desire for peace and concern for Christian lives. He said that more than a million people had been forced to flee their homes and urged the warring parties to engage in peace. US officials have been accused of invoking religious language in support of the military campaign. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, in a prayer service on Pentagon, reportedly called for “overwhelming violence of action” against US enemies. A similar rhetoric is being used by Russia by framing the war in Ukraine as a “Holy War” against Western corruption. The same is also being used in Israel, where a faction of Jewish believers are looking forward to the return of the messiah, a future Jewish King and a direct descendant of King David. Ironically, each of the three Abrahamic religion has almost similar eschatology where there is a return of Christ/ Isa and the twelfth Imam Mahdi to defeat the Antichrist/Dajjal in the war of Gog and Magog.

White House defends Trump’s call to pray for US troops after Pope Leo XIV condemns using religion to justify war, urging peace amid global conflicts.

Karoline Leavitt defends Donald Trump amid Pope Leo XIV criticism over prayer and war

A growing rift is emerging within NATO as key European allies push back against US military requests tied to escalating tensions in the Middle East, signaling a shift in alliance dynamics and strategic priorities. Italy has become the latest flashpoint. The government of Italy reportedly denied permission for US military aircraft to land at the Sigonella air base in Sicily en route to the Middle East. According to Corriere della Sera, the decision was driven not just by geopolitical caution, but by procedural concerns, Washington allegedly failed to seek prior authorization or consult Italy’s military leadership, as required under existing agreements governing US use of bases on Italian soil.&nbsp;The move reflects both institutional friction and political pressure at home. Centre-left opposition parties have urged Rome to block the use of Italian bases altogether, warning that any cooperation risks dragging the country into a widening regional conflict. While Meloni’s government has maintained it would seek parliamentary approval for such requests, the reported denial suggests a more cautious and assertive posture toward Washington.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/scott-mills-sex-abuse-claims-teen-boy-at-centre-of-probe-was-under-16-police-say-1774954301600">Scott Mills sex abuse claims: Teen boy at centre of probe was under 16, police say</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Nasze baterie Patriot i ich uzbrojenie służą do ochrony polskiego nieba i wschodniej flanki NATO. Nic w tej kwestii się nie zmienia i nigdzie nie planujemy ich przemieszczać! Nasi sojusznicy dobrze wiedzą i rozumieją jak ważne mamy tu zadania. Bezpieczeństwo Polski jest…&mdash; Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz (@KosiniakKamysz) <a href="https://twitter.com/KosiniakKamysz/status/2038875423136690443?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 31, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Further east, Poland is sending an equally firm message. Deputy Prime Minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz dismissed speculation that Warsaw might contribute air-defense assets to the Middle East after reports of an informal US request. In a post on X, he said, "Our Patriot batteries and their armament are used to protect Polish skies and NATO's eastern flank. Nothing is changing in this regard, and we are not planning to relocate them anywhere! Our allies know full well and understand how important the tasks we have here are. Poland's security is an absolute priority."&nbsp;The stakes for Poland are particularly high. With only two operational Patriot batteries currently in service, any temporary transfer would effectively halve its air-defense capability at a time when security concerns remain acute along NATO’s eastern flank, bordering Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine. Polish officials have consistently argued that national defense cannot be compromised, especially as the country continues to build out its broader air-defense network under the Wisla program.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-what-does-us-israel-want-from-iran-war-1774961106066/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-what-does-us-israel-want-from-iran-war-1774961106066/embed</a>

These developments come amid a broader surge in demand for Patriot systems globally, driven by intensifying conflict dynamics involving Iran, Israel, and US forces in the Middle East. The strain on supply has forced Washington to lean more heavily on allies, requests that are now meeting resistance.&nbsp;Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump has responded with open frustration, publicly criticizing European allies for what he sees as a lack of support. In a series of posts on Truth Social, he singled out France and the United Kingdom for refusing to align with US military efforts. He wrote, “The Country of France wouldn’t let planes headed to Israel, loaded up with military supplies, fly over French territory. France has been VERY UNHELPFUL with respect to the “Butcher of Iran,” who has been successfully eliminated! The U.S.A. will REMEMBER!!! President DJT."&nbsp;Trump’s statement underscores a divide within the alliance, as European nations weigh domestic political constraints, legal frameworks, and regional security risks against Washington’s strategic expectations. Taken together, Italy’s denial, Poland’s refusal, and Trump’s sharp rhetoric point to an increasingly transactional phase in NATO relations, one where unity is no longer assumed, and national interests are taking center stage.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

Washington vs NATO: Poland, France and Italy push back on US war demands

A growing rift is emerging within NATO as key European allies push back against US military requests tied to escalating tensions in the Middle East, signaling a shift in alliance dynamics and strategic priorities. Italy has become the latest flashpoint. The government of Italy reportedly denied permission for US military aircraft to land at the Sigonella air base in Sicily en route to the Middle East. According to Corriere della Sera, the decision was driven not just by geopolitical caution, but by procedural concerns, Washington allegedly failed to seek prior authorization or consult Italy’s military leadership, as required under existing agreements governing US use of bases on Italian soil. The move reflects both institutional friction and political pressure at home. Centre-left opposition parties have urged Rome to block the use of Italian bases altogether, warning that any cooperation risks dragging the country into a widening regional conflict. While Meloni’s government has maintained it would seek parliamentary approval for such requests, the reported denial suggests a more cautious and assertive posture toward Washington. Also Read: Scott Mills sex abuse claims: Teen boy at centre of probe was under 16, police say

Italy, France, and Poland push back on US military requests as Trump lashes out, exposing growing fractures within NATO over Middle East tensions

A desalination plant on Iran’s Qeshm Island in the strategic Strait of Hormuz has been rendered inoperable following an airstrike, Iranian media reported on Tuesday (March 31, 2026), amid escalating hostilities in the region.&nbsp;According to the ISNA news agency, the facility was “completely out of service” and could not be repaired in the short term. The report cited Health Ministry official Mohsen Farhadi but did not specify when the strike occurred.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/a-tourist-place-or-secret-network-what-s-hidden-under-iran-s-qeshm-island-1774447540088">A tourist place or SECRET network - What's hidden under Iran's Qeshm Island?</a>&nbsp;Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi had earlier said that a strike targeted Qeshm on March 7, accusing the US of carrying out a “blatant and desperate crime” from its military base in Bahrain. Qeshm, the largest Iranian island in the Gulf, stretches roughly 100 km across the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global energy corridor. While the island has gained popularity as a tourist destination in recent years, known for its UNESCO-listed rock formations and clear waters, analysts note it is also heavily militarised.&nbsp;The reported strike is part of a broader pattern of attacks on desalination facilities since the conflict began on February 28 following US-Israeli strikes on Iran. Regional tensions have since intensified with retaliatory actions. Bahrain reported an Iranian strike on a facility on March 8, which appeared to be in response to the Qeshm attack a day earlier. Kuwait also said on Monday (March 30) that an Iranian strike hit a desalination and electricity plant, an allegation Tehran denied, instead blaming Israel.

Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-blood-will-run-why-iran-will-fight-to-defend-its-persian-gulf-islands-what-is-their-strategic-importance-1773311621673">'Blood will run..’: Why Iran will fight to defend its Persian Gulf islands, what is their strategic importance?</a>&nbsp;The targeting of desalination infrastructure has raised concerns across West Asia, one of the world’s driest regions, where such facilities are critical for water supply. Desalinated water accounts for a significant share of drinking water across the Gulf - including about 42 per cent in the United Arab Emirates, 70 per cent in Saudi Arabia, 86 per cent in Oman, and 90 per cent in Kuwait, according to a 2022 report by the French Institute of International Relations.&nbsp;US President Donald Trump on Monday (March 30) warned that Washington could escalate its campaign further, threatening to “obliterate” Iran’s power infrastructure, oil facilities and “possibly all desalination plants.”&nbsp;

An airstrike has disabled a key desalination plant on Iran's Qeshm Island, worsening water scarcity and regional tensions as President Trump threatens to further target Iran's critical infrastructure.

A desalination plant on Iran’s Qeshm Island in the strategic Strait of Hormuz has been rendered inoperable following an airstrike, Iranian media reported on Tuesday (March 31, 2026), amid escalating hostilities in the region. According to the ISNA news agency, the facility was “completely out of service” and could not be repaired in the short term. The report cited Health Ministry official Mohsen Farhadi but did not specify when the strike occurred. Also read: A tourist place or SECRET network - What's hidden under Iran's Qeshm Island? Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi had earlier said that a strike targeted Qeshm on March 7, accusing the US of carrying out a “blatant and desperate crime” from its military base in Bahrain. Qeshm, the largest Iranian island in the Gulf, stretches roughly 100 km across the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global energy corridor. While the island has gained popularity as a tourist destination in recent years, known for its UNESCO-listed rock formations and clear waters, analysts note it is also heavily militarised. The reported strike is part of a broader pattern of attacks on desalination facilities since the conflict began on February 28 following US-Israeli strikes on Iran. Regional tensions have since intensified with retaliatory actions. Bahrain reported an Iranian strike on a facility on March 8, which appeared to be in response to the Qeshm attack a day earlier. Kuwait also said on Monday (March 30) that an Iranian strike hit a desalination and electricity plant, an allegation Tehran denied, instead blaming Israel.

An airstrike has disabled a key desalination plant on Iran's Qeshm Island, worsening water scarcity and regional tensions as President Trump threatens to further target Iran's critical infrastructure.

Airstrike knocks out key Iran desalination plant on Qeshm Island, makes it ‘completely out of service’

Iranian Parliament speaker Mohammad Ghalibaf has slammed the US President Donald Trump for passing on “wishes” as “news”, at the same time planning an attack against Iran. He warned that the so-called “news” is just a “pump” and "dump" scheme and dismissed the US diplomatic signals as “fake news”"Heads-up: Pre-market so-called "news" or "Truth" is often just a setup for profit-taking. Basically, it's a reverse indicator. Do the opposite: If they pump it, short it. If they dump it, go long. See something tomorrow? You know the drill," wrote Ghalibaf in a post on XHe warned Washington against any escalation, claiming it would be a ‘big mistake’, and threatened that “if they hit one”, they would be hit with several. This comes as a response to US President Donald Trump's claim that Ghalibaf was the “insider” figure who was involved in negotiations with the US.&nbsp;"Iran's enemies pass off their wishes as ‘news’ while simultaneously threatening our nation—they're dead wrong. If they strike once, they'll get hit several times back."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-gulf-countries-fund-iran-war-leavitt-1774944463207">Donald Trump may ask Gulf Nations to fund Iran war, says Karoline Leavitt</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">دشمنان ایران، آرزوهای خود را به عنوان «خبر» جا می‌زنند و در همان حال ملت ما را تهدید می‌کنند، غلط می‌کنند. یکی بزنند، چندتا میخورند. مردم ایران إن‌شاءالله تحت هدایت رهبر معظم انقلاب، دشمن را پشیمان می‌کنند و به حقوق حقهٔ خود خواهند رسید. <a href="https://t.co/pejsw844Ex">https://t.co/pejsw844Ex</a>&mdash; محمدباقر قالیباف | MB Ghalibaf (@mb_ghalibaf) <a href="https://twitter.com/mb_ghalibaf/status/2038700993731301449?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 30, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

On March 29, ISNA reported, quoting Ghalibaf as saying that Iranian forces are on alert for a potential US ground operation and that the United States and its regional partners would face severe consequences if they proceeded. He also mocked the US President Donald Trump for failing to persuade European countries to join the war against Iran. He further added that the situation in the Strait of Hormuz will not return to the pre-war situation.&nbsp;On the other hand, White House Spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said that US President Donald Trump was confident that the new regime in Iran is “more reasonable” and has enough grip on power.&nbsp;"When the President says "more reasonable," again, these folks are appearing more reasonable behind the scenes privately in these conversations than perhaps some of the previous leaders who are now no longer on planet Earth because they lied to the United States and they strung us along in negotiations, and that was unacceptable to the President, which is why many of the previous leaders were killed," said Leavitt in a press briefing on Monday, March 30. &nbsp;&nbsp;

Iran’s Mohammad Ghalibaf accuses Trump of spreading “fake news” and warns of retaliation, as tensions escalate between Washington and Tehran.

Iranian Parliament speaker Mohammad Ghalibaf has slammed the US President Donald Trump for passing on “wishes” as “news”, at the same time planning an attack against Iran. He warned that the so-called “news” is just a “pump” and "dump" scheme and dismissed the US diplomatic signals as “fake news” "Heads-up: Pre-market so-called "news" or "Truth" is often just a setup for profit-taking. Basically, it's a reverse indicator. Do the opposite: If they pump it, short it. If they dump it, go long. See something tomorrow? You know the drill," wrote Ghalibaf in a post on X He warned Washington against any escalation, claiming it would be a ‘big mistake’, and threatened that “if they hit one”, they would be hit with several. This comes as a response to US President Donald Trump's claim that Ghalibaf was the “insider” figure who was involved in negotiations with the US. "Iran's enemies pass off their wishes as ‘news’ while simultaneously threatening our nation—they're dead wrong. If they strike once, they'll get hit several times back." Also Read: Donald Trump may ask Gulf Nations to fund Iran war, says Karoline Leavitt

Iran’s Mohammad Ghalibaf accuses Trump of spreading “fake news” and warns of retaliation, as tensions escalate between Washington and Tehran.

Iran's Ghalibaf slams Trump calls pre-market 'news' a 'pump' and 'dump' scheme

Iranian media have reported that Chechen military units aligned with Ramzan Kadyrov have declared their readiness to deploy to Iran if the US launches a ground invasion, signalling a potential widening of the already volatile conflict. As per the reports, the forces loyal to Kadyrov have framed the ongoing US-Israel military campaign against Iran as a “religious war,” describing any possible intervention as a “jihad” - a battle between good and evil - in defence of the Islamic Republic.&nbsp;The development comes amid escalating tensions and speculation that the US, under President Donald Trump, may be preparing for a ground offensive after weeks of aerial bombardment reportedly failed to achieve decisive results.&nbsp;The conflict, which began on February 28, has rapidly escalated. Iranian accounts claim the war was triggered during indirect nuclear negotiations between Tehran and Washington and involved high-profile assassinations, including that of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, alongside senior commanders and civilians.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/netanyahu-says-peace-deal-between-us-iran-won-t-stop-israel-s-war-on-hezbollah-in-lebanon-report-1774944810213">Netanyahu says peace deal between US, Iran won't stop Israel’s war on Hezbollah in Lebanon: Report</a>&nbsp;Tehran has since responded with sustained military action, reportedly launching dozens of missiles and drone strikes targeting Israeli military infrastructure as well as US bases across the Persian Gulf region. Iranian officials say the armed forces have conducted at least 86 waves of retaliatory attacks, marking one of the most intense phases of confrontation between the two sides in recent years.<h2>Ukraine angle raises geopolitical stakes</h2>Adding to the complexity, Iran has also accused Ukraine of directly supporting US and Israeli operations. In a letter addressed to UN Secretary-General António Guterres and the UN Security Council, Iran’s envoy Amir Saeid Iravani alleged that Kyiv has deployed “hundreds of experts” to assist in the campaign.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/could-trump-s-attempt-to-seize-iran-s-kharg-island-risk-troops-lives-and-still-fail-to-end-the-war-1774944317534">US attempt to seize Kharg Island risk troops’ lives &amp; still fail to end war</a>&nbsp;The reported involvement of Ukrainian personnel is being viewed by analysts as a potentially significant escalation, linking the conflict more closely to the broader geopolitical rivalry involving Russia and the West amid the ongoing war in Ukraine.&nbsp;While there has been no independent confirmation of Chechen troop mobilisation or Ukrainian deployment, the claims underscore growing fears that the conflict could expand into a wider, multi-front confrontation involving multiple state and non-state actors.&nbsp;

Chechen forces pledged to support Iran against a potential US ground offensive, framing the conflict as a "holy war," while Tehran accused Ukraine of assisting US-Israeli military operations.

Iranian media have reported that Chechen military units aligned with Ramzan Kadyrov have declared their readiness to deploy to Iran if the US launches a ground invasion, signalling a potential widening of the already volatile conflict. As per the reports, the forces loyal to Kadyrov have framed the ongoing US-Israel military campaign against Iran as a “religious war,” describing any possible intervention as a “jihad” - a battle between good and evil - in defence of the Islamic Republic. The development comes amid escalating tensions and speculation that the US, under President Donald Trump, may be preparing for a ground offensive after weeks of aerial bombardment reportedly failed to achieve decisive results. The conflict, which began on February 28, has rapidly escalated. Iranian accounts claim the war was triggered during indirect nuclear negotiations between Tehran and Washington and involved high-profile assassinations, including that of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, alongside senior commanders and civilians. Also read: Netanyahu says peace deal between US, Iran won't stop Israel’s war on Hezbollah in Lebanon: Report Tehran has since responded with sustained military action, reportedly launching dozens of missiles and drone strikes targeting Israeli military infrastructure as well as US bases across the Persian Gulf region. Iranian officials say the armed forces have conducted at least 86 waves of retaliatory attacks, marking one of the most intense phases of confrontation between the two sides in recent years. Ukraine angle raises geopolitical stakes Adding to the complexity, Iran has also accused Ukraine of directly supporting US and Israeli operations. In a letter addressed to UN Secretary-General António Guterres and the UN Security Council, Iran’s envoy Amir Saeid Iravani alleged that Kyiv has deployed “hundreds of experts” to assist in the campaign. Also read: US attempt to seize Kharg Island risk troops’ lives & still fail to end war The reported involvement of Ukrainian personnel is being viewed by analysts as a potentially significant escalation, linking the conflict more closely to the broader geopolitical rivalry involving Russia and the West amid the ongoing war in Ukraine. While there has been no independent confirmation of Chechen troop mobilisation or Ukrainian deployment, the claims underscore growing fears that the conflict could expand into a wider, multi-front confrontation involving multiple state and non-state actors.

Chechen forces pledged to support Iran against a potential US ground offensive, framing the conflict as a "holy war," while Tehran accused Ukraine of assisting US-Israeli military operations.

Kadyrov’s forces ‘ready’ for Iran deployment as US-Israel campaign intensifies: Tehran media

White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt has backed the idea that US President Donald Trump might be “interested” in asking the Gulf Countries to cover the cost of the US-Israel war on Iran. Leavitt was addressing a press briefing on Monday, March 30, when she was asked whether Arab countries should pay for the war, and she suggested that President Donald Trump has similar ideas, while adding that talks with Iran were progressing well.&nbsp;"I think it's something the President ​would be quite interested in calling them to do," Leavitt said. "It's an idea that I ⁠know that he has and something that I think you'll hear more from him on."<h2>Gulf War model</h2>The proposal is built on the model of the Gulf War, when the US led a global coalition of 34 nations to “liberate” Kuwait from Iraq. The expense of the war was roughly $54 billion and was borne by the regional and global allies. The majority came from Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, in cash and “in-kind” support such as fuel and transportation. The United Arab Emirates also provides significant financial help, along with Japan and Germany. The US government reportedly had to pay zero cost of the war.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pentagon-denies-hegseth-insider-trading-iran-war-report-1774941035786">Pentagon denies reports linking Pete Hegseth's broker to defence investment</a><h2>US-Iran war</h2>The US government, however, went to war this time without any coordination with the allies, other than Israel. The war has already resulted in significant damage to US bases across the region as well as US embassies. According to the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, the US has raised to $16.5bn by day 12. However, the exact cost estimation of the 31-day war is not reported. The White House is seeking another $200 bn from Congress to fund the war in Iran. US conservative commentator and a Trump loyalist, Sean Hannity, has said that any ceasefire deal should involve Iran paying the cost of the war. Iran, however, has floated the idea of reparations from the US in exchange for any possible truce.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Who pays for the Iran war? White House says US President Donald Trump is open to asking Gulf nations like Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and the UAE to step up and share the financial burden <a href="https://t.co/uv0XeTwXAA">pic.twitter.com/uv0XeTwXAA</a>&mdash; WION (@WIONews) <a href="https://twitter.com/WIONews/status/2038880092617896107?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 31, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Trump may ask Gulf countries to fund the US-Iran war, reviving a Gulf War-style model, as costs surge and White House seeks $200 billion.

White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt has backed the idea that US President Donald Trump might be “interested” in asking the Gulf Countries to cover the cost of the US-Israel war on Iran. Leavitt was addressing a press briefing on Monday, March 30, when she was asked whether Arab countries should pay for the war, and she suggested that President Donald Trump has similar ideas, while adding that talks with Iran were progressing well. "I think it's something the President would be quite interested in calling them to do," Leavitt said. "It's an idea that I ⁠know that he has and something that I think you'll hear more from him on." Gulf War model The proposal is built on the model of the Gulf War, when the US led a global coalition of 34 nations to “liberate” Kuwait from Iraq. The expense of the war was roughly $54 billion and was borne by the regional and global allies. The majority came from Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, in cash and “in-kind” support such as fuel and transportation. The United Arab Emirates also provides significant financial help, along with Japan and Germany. The US government reportedly had to pay zero cost of the war. Also Read: Pentagon denies reports linking Pete Hegseth's broker to defence investment US-Iran war The US government, however, went to war this time without any coordination with the allies, other than Israel. The war has already resulted in significant damage to US bases across the region as well as US embassies. According to the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, the US has raised to $16.5bn by day 12. However, the exact cost estimation of the 31-day war is not reported. The White House is seeking another $200 bn from Congress to fund the war in Iran. US conservative commentator and a Trump loyalist, Sean Hannity, has said that any ceasefire deal should involve Iran paying the cost of the war. Iran, however, has floated the idea of reparations from the US in exchange for any possible truce.

Trump may ask Gulf countries to fund the US-Iran war, reviving a Gulf War-style model, as costs surge and White House seeks $200 billion.

Donald Trump may ask Gulf Nations to fund Iran war, says Karoline Leavitt

Pentagon denied reports that US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth's broker tried to make large investments in defence stocks in the build-up to the US-Israel war on Iran. The Pentagon has demanded that the newspaper “immediately” retract the report in the Financial Times. Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell has said that the allegations were “false and fabricated” and were designed to “mislead” the public.“This allegation is entirely false and fabricated. Neither Secretary Hegseth nor any of his representatives approached BlackRock about any such investment,” Parnell said in a post on Social Media. Sean Parnell asserted that "neither Secretary Hegseth nor any of his representatives approached BlackRock about any such investment".Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/gulf-countries-urge-trump-continue-iran-offensive-war-1774933358915">Gulf Nations urge Donald Trump to continue Iran offensive amid war concerns</a><h2>What were the allegations?</h2>According to the Financial Times report published on Monday, March 30, 2026, a broker at Morgan Stanley reportedly contacted BlackRock just days ahead of the US-Israel attack on Iran on February 28 to discuss a multi-billion-dollar investment for a high-profile client. The proposed investment was in the iShares Defence Industrials Active ETF, whose holdings include Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman. The purchase reportedly did not go through because the fund was unavailable for purchase at that time. Neither BlackRock nor Morgan Stanley has commented on this matter. Several reports suggest that even if the investment had been made, it would have incurred losses as shares of both the defence fund have actually declined 13 per cent, since the war with Iran.<h2>Why is the development important?</h2>The development occurs as the US President Donald Trump is seeming;y shifting the blame of the US-Israeli war on Iran to the Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth. This also comes as there were huge amount of approximately $2bn in speculative trade instruments on March 23, &nbsp;minutes before Donald Trump’s Iran truce announcement. This fuelled speculation of insider trading against individuals close to the Trump administration.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

Pentagon rejects Financial Times report alleging broker linked to Pete Hegseth sought defence ETF investments before Iran war, calls claims false.

Pentagon denied reports that US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth's broker tried to make large investments in defence stocks in the build-up to the US-Israel war on Iran. The Pentagon has demanded that the newspaper “immediately” retract the report in the Financial Times. Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell has said that the allegations were “false and fabricated” and were designed to “mislead” the public. “This allegation is entirely false and fabricated. Neither Secretary Hegseth nor any of his representatives approached BlackRock about any such investment,” Parnell said in a post on Social Media. Sean Parnell asserted that "neither Secretary Hegseth nor any of his representatives approached BlackRock about any such investment". Also Read: Gulf Nations urge Donald Trump to continue Iran offensive amid war concerns What were the allegations? According to the Financial Times report published on Monday, March 30, 2026, a broker at Morgan Stanley reportedly contacted BlackRock just days ahead of the US-Israel attack on Iran on February 28 to discuss a multi-billion-dollar investment for a high-profile client. The proposed investment was in the iShares Defence Industrials Active ETF, whose holdings include Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman. The purchase reportedly did not go through because the fund was unavailable for purchase at that time. Neither BlackRock nor Morgan Stanley has commented on this matter. Several reports suggest that even if the investment had been made, it would have incurred losses as shares of both the defence fund have actually declined 13 per cent, since the war with Iran. Why is the development important? The development occurs as the US President Donald Trump is seeming;y shifting the blame of the US-Israeli war on Iran to the Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth. This also comes as there were huge amount of approximately $2bn in speculative trade instruments on March 23, minutes before Donald Trump’s Iran truce announcement. This fuelled speculation of insider trading against individuals close to the Trump administration.

Pentagon rejects Financial Times report alleging broker linked to Pete Hegseth sought defence ETF investments before Iran war, calls claims false.

Pentagon denies reports linking Pete Hegseth's broker to defence investment

Gulf countries, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are asking the US President Donald Trump to continue its offensive operation against Tehran until its military capability is completely reduced. According to them, the military capability of Iran has not been weakened enough by the month-long US-led bombing. According to AP reports, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Bahrain have urged Trump in private conversations to continue the bombing of Iran until regime change or a significant change in Iran's behaviour. According to the US's traditional allies, this offers a historic opportunity to cripple the Clerical rule of Iran. The report suggests that these officials spoke in condition of anonymity.&nbsp;&nbsp;While Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, de facto leader of Saudi Arabia, is seeking to decrease Iran's ballistic missile capability, the clerical regime. It serves the interests of the Kingdom in the region. On the other hand, it remains wary of the attacks on its energy infrastructure. “Iran respects the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and considers it a brotherly nation,” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi wrote on X, along with a picture of a damaged American aircraft at a Saudi air base. According to the reports The UAE is perhaps the most hawkish country that is pushing for a ground invasion; Kuwait and Bahrain also favour these options.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/mohamad-safa-un-resignation-nuclear-threat-iran-allegations-1774872383427">‘Nuclear winter’ warning: UN diplomat steps down, cites safety concerns</a><h2>Gulf countries are hesitant about the US's capability to defend the empire</h2>Interestingly, Gulf Countries, at the start of the US-Israel strike on Iran, had complained about the lack of information and time for preparations. They also suggested that the US had overlooked the warnings about how a destabilisation in the region could lead to devastating consequences.&nbsp;The US is in a situation where it has an off-ramp now, and many in the Trump administration are pushing for it. While Trump himself is sending out dubious messages, Iran's leadership and military capability are “decimated”, and it is willing to settle. At the same time, he is also threatening to attack the country if it does not agree on a deal. Trump is finding it hard to rally support domestically, as almost 3000 are dead and oil prices have reached around $115 per barrel.None of the Gulf states wanted the war with Iran in the first place. Just days before it began, they were flying officials to Washington in a last-ditched attempt to prevent it. Something that was clearly ignored. After the bombing began, reports emerged that Qatar's stockpile of Patriot interceptor missiles could last as little as 4 days. Yet, America refused to help restock them“Saudi Arabia’s fighting back hard. Qatar is fighting back. UAE is fighting back. Kuwait’s fighting back. Bahrain’s fighting back,” said Trump on Sunday aboard Air Force One. Gulf countries are stuck in a situation where they want to confront the Clerical Government in Iran, but they are not confident about the US empire and its commitment to defending them. Meanwhile, the Gulf states are unified in calling for a de-escalation of the Middle East war, says Qatar, as Tehran launched new strikes against its neighbours. "Our understanding is that there is a very unified position in the Gulf on calling for the de-escalation and an end to the war," Qatar's foreign ministry spokesman Majed al-Ansari told a regular news briefing.<h2>&nbsp;</h2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Gulf allies privately urge Donald Trump to continue bombing Iran, even as fears over regional instability and oil surge grow.

Gulf countries, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are asking the US President Donald Trump to continue its offensive operation against Tehran until its military capability is completely reduced. According to them, the military capability of Iran has not been weakened enough by the month-long US-led bombing. According to AP reports, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Bahrain have urged Trump in private conversations to continue the bombing of Iran until regime change or a significant change in Iran's behaviour. According to the US's traditional allies, this offers a historic opportunity to cripple the Clerical rule of Iran. The report suggests that these officials spoke in condition of anonymity. While Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, de facto leader of Saudi Arabia, is seeking to decrease Iran's ballistic missile capability, the clerical regime. It serves the interests of the Kingdom in the region. On the other hand, it remains wary of the attacks on its energy infrastructure. “Iran respects the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and considers it a brotherly nation,” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi wrote on X, along with a picture of a damaged American aircraft at a Saudi air base. According to the reports The UAE is perhaps the most hawkish country that is pushing for a ground invasion; Kuwait and Bahrain also favour these options. Also Read: ‘Nuclear winter’ warning: UN diplomat steps down, cites safety concerns Gulf countries are hesitant about the US's capability to defend the empire Interestingly, Gulf Countries, at the start of the US-Israel strike on Iran, had complained about the lack of information and time for preparations. They also suggested that the US had overlooked the warnings about how a destabilisation in the region could lead to devastating consequences. The US is in a situation where it has an off-ramp now, and many in the Trump administration are pushing for it. While Trump himself is sending out dubious messages, Iran's leadership and military capability are “decimated”, and it is willing to settle. At the same time, he is also threatening to attack the country if it does not agree on a deal. Trump is finding it hard to rally support domestically, as almost 3000 are dead and oil prices have reached around $115 per barrel. None of the Gulf states wanted the war with Iran in the first place. Just days before it began, they were flying officials to Washington in a last-ditched attempt to prevent it. Something that was clearly ignored. After the bombing began, reports emerged that Qatar's stockpile of Patriot interceptor missiles could last as little as 4 days. Yet, America refused to help restock them “Saudi Arabia’s fighting back hard. Qatar is fighting back. UAE is fighting back. Kuwait’s fighting back. Bahrain’s fighting back,” said Trump on Sunday aboard Air Force One. Gulf countries are stuck in a situation where they want to confront the Clerical Government in Iran, but they are not confident about the US empire and its commitment to defending them. Meanwhile, the Gulf states are unified in calling for a de-escalation of the Middle East war, says Qatar, as Tehran launched new strikes against its neighbours. "Our understanding is that there is a very unified position in the Gulf on calling for the de-escalation and an end to the war," Qatar's foreign ministry spokesman Majed al-Ansari told a regular news briefing.

Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Gulf allies privately urge Donald Trump to continue bombing Iran, even as fears over regional instability and oil surge grow.

Gulf Nations urge Donald Trump to continue Iran offensive amid war concerns-Report

As the Iran-US war enters its second month, US President Donald Trump has reportedly told his aides that he is willing to end the US military campaign against Iran even if the Strait of Hormuz remains largely closed. This comes in sharp contrast with Trump's public statement on Mar 29, when he told the press that the US could reopen the Strait of Hormuz in minutes. He also claimed that Iran is at the verge of accepting his 15-point peace plan, that includes opening of Hormuz. While the Trump administration has said that negotiations with Iran are ongoing with the help of regional partners as well as Pakistan, Iran has categorically denied it, stating that only messages were exchanged, but nothing was negotiated.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-contradicts-don-t-need-iran-oil-stance-hints-at-seizing-kharg-island-1774836464859">'Favorite thing is to take oil…': Trump contradicts 'don’t need Iran oil' stance, hints at seizing Kharg Island</a><h3>Trump to end war without opening of Hormuz?</h3>According to a report by The Washington Post on Tuesday (Mar 31), Trump and his advisers concluded that an operation to force open the strategic chokepoint would likely extend the conflict beyond their expected four- to six-week timeframe. Instead, he opted for the United States to focus on weakening Iran’s naval capabilities and missile reserves. If the report is to be believed, the US may would pressure its European and Gulf allies to take primary responsibility for reopening the strait. While the report quoting unnamed US officials did not rule out military options, it said that it is not his immediate priority.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-says-iran-regime-change-happened-after-a-month-of-war-hints-at-peace-deal-soon-1774830991167">‘Iran has undergone regime change’: Trump's BIG statement after a month of war</a>&nbsp;However, Trump’s push for a swift end to the conflict appears to contradict with other steps he is taking. Over the weekend, the USS Tripoli and the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit were deployed to the region. He has also directed elements of the 82nd Airborne Division to mobilize and is reportedly weighing the deployment of an additional 10,000 ground troops to the West Asia, according to The Wall Street Journal.&nbsp;It must be understood that the prolonged closure of the strait is expected to disrupt the global economy further and drive up gas prices. The US is facing domestic and global pressure as several nations, including US allies, are already grappling with reduced energy supplies that once moved freely through the route. Key industries dependent on resources like fertilizer for agriculture and helium for semiconductor production are facing significant shortages. Experts warn that unless safe passage is quickly restored, Tehran will continue to pose a risk to global trade.<h2>Trump hints at seizing Kharg Island</h2>Meanwhile, Trump has already hinted at overtaking Iran's Kharg Island “very easily” stating that it is his favourite thing to take oil from Iran. Speaking to Financial Times in an interview on Sunday (Mar 29), Trump said, "To be honest with you, my favourite thing is to take the oil in Iran but some stupid people back in the US say: ‘why are you doing that?’ But they’re stupid people.”Maybe we take Kharg Island, maybe we don’t. We have a lot of options. It would also mean we had to be there [in Kharg Island] for a while. Asked about Iran’s defensive capabilities on the island, Trump said: "I don’t think they have any defence. We could take it very easily.” Reports also indicate possible ground operations by the US that would include raids in Strait of Hormuz and seizure of Kharg Island.&nbsp;

As the Iran–US conflict enters its second month, Donald Trump may end military operations without reopening the Strait of Hormuz, despite rising global energy concerns and hints at targeting Kharg Island.

As the Iran-US war enters its second month, US President Donald Trump has reportedly told his aides that he is willing to end the US military campaign against Iran even if the Strait of Hormuz remains largely closed. This comes in sharp contrast with Trump's public statement on Mar 29, when he told the press that the US could reopen the Strait of Hormuz in minutes. He also claimed that Iran is at the verge of accepting his 15-point peace plan, that includes opening of Hormuz. While the Trump administration has said that negotiations with Iran are ongoing with the help of regional partners as well as Pakistan, Iran has categorically denied it, stating that only messages were exchanged, but nothing was negotiated. Also Read: 'Favorite thing is to take oil…': Trump contradicts 'don’t need Iran oil' stance, hints at seizing Kharg Island Trump to end war without opening of Hormuz? According to a report by The Washington Post on Tuesday (Mar 31), Trump and his advisers concluded that an operation to force open the strategic chokepoint would likely extend the conflict beyond their expected four- to six-week timeframe. Instead, he opted for the United States to focus on weakening Iran’s naval capabilities and missile reserves. If the report is to be believed, the US may would pressure its European and Gulf allies to take primary responsibility for reopening the strait. While the report quoting unnamed US officials did not rule out military options, it said that it is not his immediate priority. Also Read: ‘Iran has undergone regime change’: Trump's BIG statement after a month of war However, Trump’s push for a swift end to the conflict appears to contradict with other steps he is taking. Over the weekend, the USS Tripoli and the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit were deployed to the region. He has also directed elements of the 82nd Airborne Division to mobilize and is reportedly weighing the deployment of an additional 10,000 ground troops to the West Asia, according to The Wall Street Journal. It must be understood that the prolonged closure of the strait is expected to disrupt the global economy further and drive up gas prices. The US is facing domestic and global pressure as several nations, including US allies, are already grappling with reduced energy supplies that once moved freely through the route. Key industries dependent on resources like fertilizer for agriculture and helium for semiconductor production are facing significant shortages. Experts warn that unless safe passage is quickly restored, Tehran will continue to pose a risk to global trade. Trump hints at seizing Kharg Island Meanwhile, Trump has already hinted at overtaking Iran's Kharg Island “very easily” stating that it is his favourite thing to take oil from Iran. Speaking to Financial Times in an interview on Sunday (Mar 29), Trump said, "To be honest with you, my favourite thing is to take the oil in Iran but some stupid people back in the US say: ‘why are you doing that?’ But they’re stupid people.”Maybe we take Kharg Island, maybe we don’t. We have a lot of options. It would also mean we had to be there [in Kharg Island] for a while. Asked about Iran’s defensive capabilities on the island, Trump said: "I don’t think they have any defence. We could take it very easily.” Reports also indicate possible ground operations by the US that would include raids in Strait of Hormuz and seizure of Kharg Island.

As the Iran–US conflict enters its second month, Donald Trump may end military operations without reopening the Strait of Hormuz, despite rising global energy concerns and hints at targeting Kharg Island.

Trump willing to end Iran war without reopening Strait of Hormuz: New report makes EXPLOSIVE claims

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in his first sit-down interview since the war against Iran started, said that the conflict has crossed the halfway mark in terms of objectives. However, he stopped short of committing to any timeline for when the fighting might end. "It's definitely beyond the halfway point. But I don't want to put a schedule on it," Netanyahu told conservative US broadcaster Newsmax on Monday (Mar 30). As rumours of the Israeli PM's death continue to swirl, he clarified that he was measuring progress by missions accomplished rather than time elapsed. That distinction matters. Here's why.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/jd-vance-says-he-ll-get-to-the-bottom-of-ufo-files-also-he-thinks-aliens-are-demons-1774680082168">JD Vance says he'll get to the bottom of UFO files. Also, he thinks aliens are demons | Watch</a><h2>Missions vs time: When will the Iran war end?</h2>When US President Donald Trump and Netanyahu jointly launched the offensive on February 28, Trump had suggested the operation would wrap up within four to six weeks. March 31 marks Day 32 of the US-Israel, Iran war.Secretary of State Marco Rubio struck a more cautious tone Monday, saying the war would likely continue for "weeks" rather than months. His statement comes amid growing public opposition as oil prices continue climbing.<h2>What has Trump-Netanyahu's war achieved so far?</h2>In his interview, Netanyahu said that the war against Iran has achieved concrete gains so far, killing "thousands" of Revolutionary Guard members, with the US and Israel "close to finishing their arms industry.""Just the whole industrial base -- wiping out all, you know, just plants, entire plants, and the nuclear program itself," he said. Netanyahu and Trump have repeatedly maintained that Iran was on the verge of acquiring a nuclear weapon. The UN's nuclear watchdog does not support the claim. Notably, last year, after the 12-day war, Trump himself claimed that he had already "obliterated" Iran's key nuclear sites.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-fake-news-will-say-trump-rebrands-hormuz-the-strait-of-trump-was-it-a-slip-of-tongue-or-deliberate-watch-1774667533281">'Fake news will say...': Trump rebrands Hormuz 'The Strait of Trump'—was it a slip of tongue or a warning? Watch!</a>Netanyahu also weighed in on the question of regime change in the Islamic Republic. He said he believes Iran's Islamic Republic will "collapse internally," but insisted that "at the moment, right now, what we're doing is just degrading their military capacity, degrading their missile capacity, degrading their nuclear capacity and also weakening them from the inside."Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Is the Iran war already past its halfway mark? Benjamin Netanyahu, in his first sit-down interview amid death rumours, says yes, but refuses to give a timeline, even as the conflict crosses Day 30. How close is the end really?

Scroll down to read more.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in his first sit-down interview since the war against Iran started, said that the conflict has crossed the halfway mark in terms of objectives. However, he stopped short of committing to any timeline for when the fighting might end. "It's definitely beyond the halfway point. But I don't want to put a schedule on it," Netanyahu told conservative US broadcaster Newsmax on Monday (Mar 30). As rumours of the Israeli PM's death continue to swirl, he clarified that he was measuring progress by missions accomplished rather than time elapsed. That distinction matters. Here's why. Also read | JD Vance says he'll get to the bottom of UFO files. Also, he thinks aliens are demons | Watch Missions vs time: When will the Iran war end? When US President Donald Trump and Netanyahu jointly launched the offensive on February 28, Trump had suggested the operation would wrap up within four to six weeks. March 31 marks Day 32 of the US-Israel, Iran war. Secretary of State Marco Rubio struck a more cautious tone Monday, saying the war would likely continue for "weeks" rather than months. His statement comes amid growing public opposition as oil prices continue climbing. What has Trump-Netanyahu's war achieved so far? In his interview, Netanyahu said that the war against Iran has achieved concrete gains so far, killing "thousands" of Revolutionary Guard members, with the US and Israel "close to finishing their arms industry." "Just the whole industrial base -- wiping out all, you know, just plants, entire plants, and the nuclear program itself," he said. Netanyahu and Trump have repeatedly maintained that Iran was on the verge of acquiring a nuclear weapon. The UN's nuclear watchdog does not support the claim. Notably, last year, after the 12-day war, Trump himself claimed that he had already "obliterated" Iran's key nuclear sites. Also read | 'Fake news will say...': Trump rebrands Hormuz 'The Strait of Trump'—was it a slip of tongue or a warning? Watch! Netanyahu also weighed in on the question of regime change in the Islamic Republic. He said he believes Iran's Islamic Republic will "collapse internally," but insisted that "at the moment, right now, what we're doing is just degrading their military capacity, degrading their missile capacity, degrading their nuclear capacity and also weakening them from the inside." Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Is the Iran war already past its halfway mark? Benjamin Netanyahu, in his first sit-down interview amid death rumours, says yes, but refuses to give a timeline, even as the conflict crosses Day 30. How close is the end really?Scroll down to read more.

As death rumours swirl, Netanyahu sits down for interview claiming Iran war past halfway; but refuses to give end date

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, on Monday (March 30), during the press briefing, said that the US operation in Iran is moving 'successfully'. Leavitt said more than 11,000 enemy targets have been struck so far, creating ‘more leverage for the United States and its allies’ and significantly weakening Iran’s offensive and defensive capabilities. She added that Iran’s ballistic missile and drone attacks are down by about 90%. As per Leavitt, the US has also ‘decimated’ Iran’s navy, destroying more than 150 vessels, including ‘92% of their largest vessels’.&nbsp;She further claimed that the Iranian regime is ‘eager to end the destruction’ and come to the negotiation table. However, Iranian officials have repeatedly denied that they are engaged in talks with the United States. Addressing those reports, Leavitt said that despite the Iranian regime’s ‘public posturing’ and what she described as the media’s ‘false reporting’, talks between the US and Iran are still underway and progressing well. She added that private communication differs from what is said publicly.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/g7-vows-all-necessary-steps-to-stabilise-energy-markets-as-crude-oil-surges-to-116-amid-escalating-west-asia-war-1774882203136">G7 vows ‘all necessary steps’ to stabilise energy markets as crude oil surges to $116 amid escalating West Asia war</a>&nbsp;Leavitt said that President Donald Trump has issued a 10-day pause to ‘postpone’ planned strikes on Iran’s power plants and energy infrastructure. She described the moment as, ‘This remains a truly once-in-a-generation opportunity for the regime to make a good deal with the United States." Leavitt warned that if Iran rejects the offer, the US military ‘continues to stand by’ to provide Trump ‘every option available to ensure this regime continues to pay a grave price’.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-congress-report-nails-pakistan-s-role-in-formenting-terrorism-on-india-1774892669342/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-congress-report-nails-pakistan-s-role-in-formenting-terrorism-on-india-1774892669342/embed</a>&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

'Once in a generation opportunity': White House on 'talks' with Iran

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, on Monday (March 30), during the press briefing, said that the US operation in Iran is moving 'successfully'. Leavitt said more than 11,000 enemy targets have been struck so far, creating ‘more leverage for the United States and its allies’ and significantly weakening Iran’s offensive and defensive capabilities. She added that Iran’s ballistic missile and drone attacks are down by about 90%. As per Leavitt, the US has also ‘decimated’ Iran’s navy, destroying more than 150 vessels, including ‘92% of their largest vessels’. She further claimed that the Iranian regime is ‘eager to end the destruction’ and come to the negotiation table. However, Iranian officials have repeatedly denied that they are engaged in talks with the United States. Addressing those reports, Leavitt said that despite the Iranian regime’s ‘public posturing’ and what she described as the media’s ‘false reporting’, talks between the US and Iran are still underway and progressing well. She added that private communication differs from what is said publicly. Also Read: G7 vows ‘all necessary steps’ to stabilise energy markets as crude oil surges to $116 amid escalating West Asia war Leavitt said that President Donald Trump has issued a 10-day pause to ‘postpone’ planned strikes on Iran’s power plants and energy infrastructure. She described the moment as, ‘This remains a truly once-in-a-generation opportunity for the regime to make a good deal with the United States." Leavitt warned that if Iran rejects the offer, the US military ‘continues to stand by’ to provide Trump ‘every option available to ensure this regime continues to pay a grave price’. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-congress-report-nails-pakistan-s-role-in-formenting-terrorism-on-india-1774892669342/embed Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

White House claims 11,000 strikes hit Iran, cutting attacks by 90% and damaging naval power, while insisting talks continue despite Iran’s denial

As conflict in West Asia intensifies, concerns are growing over potential disruptions to global internet infrastructure, particularly undersea cables in the Red Sea. While Iran has not officially threatened such action, several accounts on X have raised alarms about possible cable damage amid rising tensions involving the US, Israel, and Iran.&nbsp;The last major disruption occurred in September 2025, when a commercial vessel reportedly dragged its anchor and damaged multiple submarine fibre optic cables. This incident caused noticeable internet slowdowns across parts of West and South Asia. Now, with the conflict escalating and Yemen’s Houthi group entering the fray, fears of a deliberate attack have increased. The Iran-backed Houthis have previously issued threats on social media about targeting these critical cables, making the risk difficult to ignore.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/why-bbc-dismissed-scott-mills-from-radio-2-shocking-email-reveals-details-1774874648753">Why BBC dismissed Scott Mills from Radio 2? Shocking email reveals details</a>&nbsp;According to the International Cable Protection Committee, four key cables were affected in the 2025 incident: SEA-ME-WE 4, India-Middle East-Western Europe (IMEWE), FALCON (GCX), and Europe India Gateway (EIG). Experts say that around 30% of cable faults each year are caused by ship anchors, but the current geopolitical climate raises the possibility of intentional disruption. These Red Sea cables are vital for global connectivity, supporting financial systems, cloud computing, video communication, email, and AI operations. Any damage could have widespread consequences.<h2>What does it mean for India?</h2>India, which was impacted during the 2025 outage, could again face disruptions. Although services did not completely fail, users experienced slow speeds and latency. With increasing dependence on digital payments, cloud infrastructure, and AI technologies, India remains vulnerable. Nearly 95% of international data is transmitted via undersea cables.&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-us-forces-could-take-iran-s-kharg-island-very-soon-floats-seizing-iran-oil-exports-1774876465787/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-us-forces-could-take-iran-s-kharg-island-very-soon-floats-seizing-iran-oil-exports-1774876465787/embed</a>&nbsp;India currently connects through 17 cables across 14 landing stations, primarily in Mumbai and Chennai. However, this uneven distribution creates a risk; any disruption in these hubs could significantly impact connectivity across the country. As tensions persist in the region, the threat to critical internet infrastructure remains a growing concern for India and the world.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

As US-Iran war escalates, Red Sea cable threat raises fear of internet disruption in India

As conflict in West Asia intensifies, concerns are growing over potential disruptions to global internet infrastructure, particularly undersea cables in the Red Sea. While Iran has not officially threatened such action, several accounts on X have raised alarms about possible cable damage amid rising tensions involving the US, Israel, and Iran. The last major disruption occurred in September 2025, when a commercial vessel reportedly dragged its anchor and damaged multiple submarine fibre optic cables. This incident caused noticeable internet slowdowns across parts of West and South Asia. Now, with the conflict escalating and Yemen’s Houthi group entering the fray, fears of a deliberate attack have increased. The Iran-backed Houthis have previously issued threats on social media about targeting these critical cables, making the risk difficult to ignore. Also Read: Why BBC dismissed Scott Mills from Radio 2? Shocking email reveals details According to the International Cable Protection Committee, four key cables were affected in the 2025 incident: SEA-ME-WE 4, India-Middle East-Western Europe (IMEWE), FALCON (GCX), and Europe India Gateway (EIG). Experts say that around 30% of cable faults each year are caused by ship anchors, but the current geopolitical climate raises the possibility of intentional disruption. These Red Sea cables are vital for global connectivity, supporting financial systems, cloud computing, video communication, email, and AI operations. Any damage could have widespread consequences. What does it mean for India? India, which was impacted during the 2025 outage, could again face disruptions. Although services did not completely fail, users experienced slow speeds and latency. With increasing dependence on digital payments, cloud infrastructure, and AI technologies, India remains vulnerable. Nearly 95% of international data is transmitted via undersea cables. https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-us-forces-could-take-iran-s-kharg-island-very-soon-floats-seizing-iran-oil-exports-1774876465787/embed India currently connects through 17 cables across 14 landing stations, primarily in Mumbai and Chennai. However, this uneven distribution creates a risk; any disruption in these hubs could significantly impact connectivity across the country. As tensions persist in the region, the threat to critical internet infrastructure remains a growing concern for India and the world. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

Rising West Asia tensions spark fears of Red Sea cable damage, risking internet disruptions in India and globally due to heavy reliance on undersea networks

Mohamad Safa, a UN human rights diplomat, has resigned from his position, accusing that the International Organisation is preparing for the possible use of nuclear weapons in Iran possibly by US or Israel. He resigned from his diplomatic position on Friday, and in a series of posts, he warned about a looming nuclear catastrophe and threat to his own safety and well-being.&nbsp;“I gave up my diplomatic career to leak this information. I suspended my duties so as not to be part of or a witness to this crime against humanity, in an attempt to prevent a nuclear winter before it is too late,” wrote Mohammad Safa in a social media post. Safa pointed out that the capital of Iran, Tehran, has a population of nearly 10 million people. “Imagine nuking Washington, Berlin, Paris, London, or beyond, bombed with nuclear weapons.” He urged people to spread the word.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-growth-forecast-cut-amid-war-economy-seen-expanding-3-3-3-8-in-2026-1774869371267">Israel growth forecast cut amid war; economy seen expanding 3.3-3.8% in 2026</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">I don&#39;t think people understand the gravity of the situation as the UN is preparing for possible nuclear weapon use in Iran. This is a picture of Tehran. For you uneducated, untraveled, never-served, warhawks licking your chops at the thought of bombing it. It&#39;s not some low… <a href="https://t.co/BnzB4F3001">pic.twitter.com/BnzB4F3001</a>&mdash; Mohamad Safa (@mhdksafa) <a href="https://twitter.com/mhdksafa/status/2038190305950781695?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 29, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Mohamad Safa received life threats</h2>In his resignation letter, Mohamad Safa alleged that he and his family had received death threats, “the UN has abandoned me". He further accused a lobby by senior UN officials, which has financially penalised him, censored him and denied freedom of expression. &nbsp;“Yesterday, nearly ten million people protested ‘No Kings’ in the United States,” Safa continued. “The possibility of the use of nuclear weapons must be taken very seriously. It's dangerous. Act now. Spread this message worldwide. Take the streets. Protest for our humanity and future. Only the people can stop it. History will remember us.”<h2>Allegations of a misinformation campaign</h2>Safa accused senior UN officials of orchestrating a misinformation campaign against Iran and its government to serve a certain political lobby. He further expressed dissatisfaction with the UN's inaction to condemn the US-Israel war on Iran. He drew a pattern of similarities in the inefficiencies of the UN in the Gaza Strip and Israel's war to occupy Lebanon.“This lobby was used to deceive you into believing that Iran posed an imminent threat to world peace. This was a lie and is the same tactic used to commit genocide in Gaza and the same tactic is being used now to ethnic cleansing and the occupation of Lebanon,” wrote Safa.&nbsp;

UN diplomat Mohamad Safa resigns, alleging a nuclear threat and a misinformation campaign. He claims threats to his safety and urges global action.

Mohamad Safa, a UN human rights diplomat, has resigned from his position, accusing that the International Organisation is preparing for the possible use of nuclear weapons in Iran possibly by US or Israel. He resigned from his diplomatic position on Friday, and in a series of posts, he warned about a looming nuclear catastrophe and threat to his own safety and well-being. “I gave up my diplomatic career to leak this information. I suspended my duties so as not to be part of or a witness to this crime against humanity, in an attempt to prevent a nuclear winter before it is too late,” wrote Mohammad Safa in a social media post. Safa pointed out that the capital of Iran, Tehran, has a population of nearly 10 million people. “Imagine nuking Washington, Berlin, Paris, London, or beyond, bombed with nuclear weapons.” He urged people to spread the word. Also Read: Israel growth forecast cut amid war; economy seen expanding 3.3-3.8% in 2026

UN diplomat Mohamad Safa resigns, alleging a nuclear threat and a misinformation campaign. He claims threats to his safety and urges global action.

‘Nuclear winter’ warning: UN diplomat steps down, cites safety concerns

Israel's Finance Ministry have said that the country's economy is expected to grow at 3.3 per cent and 3.8 per cent in 2026. The economy is likely to shrink in the first three months as the war with War continues. The country's economy is expected to grow by 3.8 per cent Iran ends by mid-April, and fighting with Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon finishes by the end of April. But if the fighting continues till the end of April. If it continues through June, then the economy is likely to grow by 3.3 per cent.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/fpi-outflows-india-march-2026-market-impact-rupee-oil-1774861514706">Foreign investors fleeing Indian market, dump $12 bn Indian equities amid Iran war</a>According to Finance Ministry Chief Economist Shmuel Abramzon, the economy will end the first quarter with negative growth of 9.5 per cent in annual terms and 2.5 per cent in quarterly terms. Earlier this month, the growth forecast was downgraded from 5.2 per cent to 4.8 per cent in 2026, on the assumption that the war with Iran would end soon. However, the war has expanded significantly. Both countries are at a phase of stalemate and without any off-ramp."Since this scenario did not materialise and the fighting was prolonged and is still ongoing, the Chief Economist’s Department updated its economic growth forecasts under a number of possible scenarios depending on the continuation of the fighting,” said the Finance Ministry of Israel.The Israeli Knesset on Monday approved a defence-heavy budget of 699-billion shekel ($221 billion), which would allow Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government to avert a snap election within 90 days. For FY27, the economy is expected to grow by 5.3 per cent to 6.1 per cent. - Write SEO package&nbsp;

Israel cuts growth outlook to 3.3-3.8 per cent for 2026 amid ongoing war. Q1 contraction expected as defence spending rises and uncertainty continues.

Israel's Finance Ministry have said that the country's economy is expected to grow at 3.3 per cent and 3.8 per cent in 2026. The economy is likely to shrink in the first three months as the war with War continues. The country's economy is expected to grow by 3.8 per cent Iran ends by mid-April, and fighting with Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon finishes by the end of April. But if the fighting continues till the end of April. If it continues through June, then the economy is likely to grow by 3.3 per cent. Also Read: Foreign investors fleeing Indian market, dump $12 bn Indian equities amid Iran war According to Finance Ministry Chief Economist Shmuel Abramzon, the economy will end the first quarter with negative growth of 9.5 per cent in annual terms and 2.5 per cent in quarterly terms. Earlier this month, the growth forecast was downgraded from 5.2 per cent to 4.8 per cent in 2026, on the assumption that the war with Iran would end soon. However, the war has expanded significantly. Both countries are at a phase of stalemate and without any off-ramp. "Since this scenario did not materialise and the fighting was prolonged and is still ongoing, the Chief Economist’s Department updated its economic growth forecasts under a number of possible scenarios depending on the continuation of the fighting,” said the Finance Ministry of Israel. The Israeli Knesset on Monday approved a defence-heavy budget of 699-billion shekel ($221 billion), which would allow Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government to avert a snap election within 90 days. For FY27, the economy is expected to grow by 5.3 per cent to 6.1 per cent. - Write SEO package

Israel cuts growth outlook to 3.3-3.8 per cent for 2026 amid ongoing war. Q1 contraction expected as defence spending rises and uncertainty continues.

Israel growth forecast cut amid war; economy seen expanding 3.3-3.8% in 2026

Iran has firmly denied any involvement in Pakistan’s proposal to host direct talks between the United States and Iran. The Consulate General of Iran in Mumbai clarified on Monday (March 30) that no direct negotiations with the United States have taken place. Instead, it said only excessive and unreasonable demands have been conveyed through intermediaries. The consulate stressed that any forums organized by Pakistan are independent of Iran’s participation.&nbsp;&nbsp;While acknowledging regional appeals to end the conflict, Iran reiterated its stance and questioned the origins of the ongoing tensions. "No direct US talks; only excessive, unreasonable demands via intermediaries. US 'diplomacy' flips constantly; our stance is clear. Pakistan's forums are their own; we didn't participate. Regional calls to end the war are welcome, but remember who started it!" the Consulate General said in a statement.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-hit-another-iranian-school-using-a-precision-missile-untested-for-war-on-the-same-day-as-minab-strike-claims-report-1774867646837">US hit another Iranian school using a precision missile untested for war on the same day as Minab strike, claims report</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Iran?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Iran</a> FM Spox: No direct US talks; only excessive, unreasonable demands via intermediaries.<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/US?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#US</a> &quot;diplomacy&quot; flips constantly; our stance is clear. Pakistan&#39;s forums are their own; we didn&#39;t participate. Regional calls to end war are welcome, but remember who started it!<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/War?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#War</a> <a href="https://t.co/o9NDkZAAqN">pic.twitter.com/o9NDkZAAqN</a>&mdash; Consulate General of the I.R. Iran in Mumbai (@IRANinMumbai) <a href="https://twitter.com/IRANinMumbai/status/2038546014282621373?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 30, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Pakistan announced on Sunday (March 29), following several hours of talks in Islamabad, where Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, who also serves as deputy prime minister, hosted his counterparts from Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Turkey. Dar said he and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had held multiple phone conversations with senior Iranian officials, including Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. He also said that Pakistan had been actively engaging with the US administration.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-centre-allows-kerosene-sale-at-petrol-pumps-to-ease-lpg-supply-pressure-wion-1774859388899/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-centre-allows-kerosene-sale-at-petrol-pumps-to-ease-lpg-supply-pressure-wion-1774859388899/embed</a>&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

'We didn't participate': Iran denies Pakistan's claim of hosting talks to end US-Iran war

Iran has firmly denied any involvement in Pakistan’s proposal to host direct talks between the United States and Iran. The Consulate General of Iran in Mumbai clarified on Monday (March 30) that no direct negotiations with the United States have taken place. Instead, it said only excessive and unreasonable demands have been conveyed through intermediaries. The consulate stressed that any forums organized by Pakistan are independent of Iran’s participation. While acknowledging regional appeals to end the conflict, Iran reiterated its stance and questioned the origins of the ongoing tensions. "No direct US talks; only excessive, unreasonable demands via intermediaries. US 'diplomacy' flips constantly; our stance is clear. Pakistan's forums are their own; we didn't participate. Regional calls to end the war are welcome, but remember who started it!" the Consulate General said in a statement. Also Read: US hit another Iranian school using a precision missile untested for war on the same day as Minab strike, claims report

Iran denies joining Pakistan-led US talks, says no direct negotiations occurred, and calls US demands unreasonable amid ongoing tensions

US President Donald Trump, in his Truth Social post, claimed that March 30 was the “big day” for Iran. In his Truth Social Post Trump claimed that the US has already taken out "many long-sought-after targets". This post comes after Trump's claim that Iran has already achieved its objective of regime change in Iran.&nbsp;“Big day in Iran. Many long-sought-after targets have been taken out and destroyed by our GREAT MILITARY, the finest and most lethal in the World. God bless you all!” wrote Trump in his latest Truth Social Post.Trump had earlier suggested that a deal with Iran is close and claimed that they have already changed the earlier group of leaders. “It's a whole different group of people. So I would consider that regime change,” said US President Donald Trump while speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-iran-20-oil-ships-strait-of-hormuz-pakistan-claim-1774847850141">Trump claims Iran cleared 20 ships as a 'sign of respect'; Pakistan says vessels are theirs</a>The war in Iran has entered its 31st day. The Strait of Hormuz remains closed effectively. Eventhough Trump has claimed that the US has already claimed its objective global benchmark for crude oil, Brent Crude has risen to $115.85 per barrel. While US-Israeli forces have struck a petrochemical facility in Tabriz, affecting the power supply in parts of Tehran. An Iranian fire hit an industrial area in Southern Israel, causing a massive blaze.Iranian speaker of Parliament, MB Ghalibaf, accused the US of talking about diplomacy while planning a ground attack. "The enemy publicly sends messages of negotiation and dialogue while secretly planning a ground attack," read his statement as reported by the Iranian state media IRNA. The US continues to mobilise troops to West Asia, as 3,500 Marines and sailors have reached Iran aboard the USS Tripoli; similarly 82nd Airborne Division have been mobilised in the region, with several reports suggesting that the US is planning an invasion of Kharg Island.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Trump calls it a “big day in Iran” after US strikes. Oil prices surge, and tensions rise as Iran accuses the US of planning a ground invasion.

US President Donald Trump, in his Truth Social post, claimed that March 30 was the “big day” for Iran. In his Truth Social Post Trump claimed that the US has already taken out "many long-sought-after targets". This post comes after Trump's claim that Iran has already achieved its objective of regime change in Iran. “Big day in Iran. Many long-sought-after targets have been taken out and destroyed by our GREAT MILITARY, the finest and most lethal in the World. God bless you all!” wrote Trump in his latest Truth Social Post. Trump had earlier suggested that a deal with Iran is close and claimed that they have already changed the earlier group of leaders. “It's a whole different group of people. So I would consider that regime change,” said US President Donald Trump while speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One. Also Read: Trump claims Iran cleared 20 ships as a 'sign of respect'; Pakistan says vessels are theirs The war in Iran has entered its 31st day. The Strait of Hormuz remains closed effectively. Eventhough Trump has claimed that the US has already claimed its objective global benchmark for crude oil, Brent Crude has risen to $115.85 per barrel. While US-Israeli forces have struck a petrochemical facility in Tabriz, affecting the power supply in parts of Tehran. An Iranian fire hit an industrial area in Southern Israel, causing a massive blaze. Iranian speaker of Parliament, MB Ghalibaf, accused the US of talking about diplomacy while planning a ground attack. "The enemy publicly sends messages of negotiation and dialogue while secretly planning a ground attack," read his statement as reported by the Iranian state media IRNA. The US continues to mobilise troops to West Asia, as 3,500 Marines and sailors have reached Iran aboard the USS Tripoli; similarly 82nd Airborne Division have been mobilised in the region, with several reports suggesting that the US is planning an invasion of Kharg Island.

Trump calls it a “big day in Iran” after US strikes. Oil prices surge, and tensions rise as Iran accuses the US of planning a ground invasion.

Donald Trump says ‘big day in Iran’  claims key targets destroyed amid talks of diplomacy

US President Donald Trump on Sunday night aboard Air Force One said that, the Iran has allowed almost 20 cargo ships of oil through the Strait of Hormuz, starting on Monday, March 30. He called this a “tribute” and a “sign of respect” to the US. He also implied that Tehran's decision was a sign that the negotiations are underway and the war was coming to an end. However, it was not clear where these 20 ships were headed. China and India are the major buyers of Iranian oil. The ship could also belong to the Gulf nations.&nbsp;“As you know, they agreed to send eight boats two days ago, and they added another two. So, that’s 10 boats. So, today they gave us as a tribute…I don’t know, I can’t describe it exactly…I think out of a sign of respect, 20 boats of oil, big, big boats of oil going through the Hormuz Strait. That’s taking place starting tomorrow morning over the next couple of days. I would only say that we are doing extremely well in negotiations,” said Trump to the reporters aboard Air Force One.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/us-iran-war-day-30-kharg-island-escalation-global-impact-1774799290072">US-Iran war day 30: Kharg Island showdown, regional escalation and global market shock</a><h2>Do the 20 ships belong to Pakistan?</h2>Pakistani Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Isaq Dar confirmed that Iran has approved 20 Pakistani-flagged vessels to sail through the Strait of Hormuz. According to the agreement, two ships will be allowed to cross the Strait every day. “This positive announcement marks a meaningful step toward peace and will strengthen our collective efforts in that direction”, wrote Dar in a social media post.&nbsp;While Iranian authorities have not confirmed the passing of the vessels or any possible "sign of respect" for the US, they have indicated that non-hostile vessels can pass through. Pakistan has claimed Iran has allowed two-pakistani flagged vessel to pass through the Strait of Hormuz since February 28. In an interview with the Financial Time Trump said that Tehran has allowed 10-Pakistani flagged vehicle to pass through. “They gave us 10. Now they’re giving 20, and the 20 have already started, and they’re going right up the middle of the Strait,” US President Donald Trump claimed that this shows Iran's willingness to negotiate.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Trump says Iran allowed 20 oil ships via the Strait of Hormuz as a “tribute.” Pakistan confirms vessels are Pakistani amid ongoing US-Iran tensions.

US President Donald Trump on Sunday night aboard Air Force One said that, the Iran has allowed almost 20 cargo ships of oil through the Strait of Hormuz, starting on Monday, March 30. He called this a “tribute” and a “sign of respect” to the US. He also implied that Tehran's decision was a sign that the negotiations are underway and the war was coming to an end. However, it was not clear where these 20 ships were headed. China and India are the major buyers of Iranian oil. The ship could also belong to the Gulf nations. “As you know, they agreed to send eight boats two days ago, and they added another two. So, that’s 10 boats. So, today they gave us as a tribute…I don’t know, I can’t describe it exactly…I think out of a sign of respect, 20 boats of oil, big, big boats of oil going through the Hormuz Strait. That’s taking place starting tomorrow morning over the next couple of days. I would only say that we are doing extremely well in negotiations,” said Trump to the reporters aboard Air Force One. Also read: US-Iran war day 30: Kharg Island showdown, regional escalation and global market shock Do the 20 ships belong to Pakistan? Pakistani Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Isaq Dar confirmed that Iran has approved 20 Pakistani-flagged vessels to sail through the Strait of Hormuz. According to the agreement, two ships will be allowed to cross the Strait every day. “This positive announcement marks a meaningful step toward peace and will strengthen our collective efforts in that direction”, wrote Dar in a social media post. While Iranian authorities have not confirmed the passing of the vessels or any possible "sign of respect" for the US, they have indicated that non-hostile vessels can pass through. Pakistan has claimed Iran has allowed two-pakistani flagged vessel to pass through the Strait of Hormuz since February 28. In an interview with the Financial Time Trump said that Tehran has allowed 10-Pakistani flagged vehicle to pass through. “They gave us 10. Now they’re giving 20, and the 20 have already started, and they’re going right up the middle of the Strait,” US President Donald Trump claimed that this shows Iran's willingness to negotiate.

Trump says Iran allowed 20 oil ships via the Strait of Hormuz as a “tribute.” Pakistan confirms vessels are Pakistani amid ongoing US-Iran tensions.

Trump claims Iran cleared 20 ships as a 'sign of respect'; Pakistan says vessels are theirs

US President Donald Trump has said that a regime change has already happened in Iran, adding that the United States is having very meaningful conversation with the Iranians. However, maintaining that one can never know with Iran, Trump accepted that the US has bombed the country amid negotiations for two times - one in 2025 with B2 bombers and other on Feb 28, that has led to a month- long war. Reiterating that the Iran war is “ahead of schedule”, Trump said that the US is dealing with a “completely different set of people” who are reasonable. He said that there can be a deal with Tehran “pretty soon.” About the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, Trump said that he may be alive but he is seriously wounded. Hinting a green light towards the peace plan, Trump said that the Iranians have responded and even gave several ships of oil boats as gift that passed through the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;"The one regime was decimated, destroyed, they're all dead. The next regime is mostly dead. And the third regime, we're dealing with different people than anybody's dealt with before. It's a whole different group of people. So I would consider that regime change. And frankly, they've been very reasonable. So I think we've had regime change. We can't do much better than that. The regime that was really bad, really evil, was the first one. That was done. The second was appointed, and they're gone. They're all dead,” the president told reporters aboard Air Force One. About a possible deal, "I think we'll make a deal with them, pretty sure...but we've had regime change," he said.&nbsp;Elsewhere during his conversation, he said that Iran is decimated and they will to give up nuclear weapons. On Iran charging tolls from ships crossing the Hormuz, Trump said he will find out about it. Hailing the Gulf nations for fighting back, Trump said, “They are fighting back. Saudi Arabia is fighting back hard. Qatar is fighting back. UAE is fighting back. Kuwait's fighting back. Bahrain's fighting back. They're all fighting back. Actually, they were surprised to be hit. I was very surprised they got hit. And once they got hit, they started fighting very well.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-irgc-issues-ultimatum-to-us-universities-in-west-asia-after-attack-on-campuses-in-tehran-1774741664288/amp">'By 12 noon...': Iran issues ultimatum to US universities in West Asia after attack on campuses in Tehran</a><h2>What we know about the Iran war so far?</h2>The war began on February 28, when the United States and Israel carried out pre-emptive airstrikes across Iran. The subsequent escalation reportedly resulted in the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, triggering a broad Iranian retaliation targeting not just Israel but also US bases across Gulf countries.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-mocks-saudi-s-very-regular-kind-of-a-guy-mohammad-bin-salman-in-blunt-remarks-1774755156132">'Kissing my a**': Trump mocks Saudi's 'very regular kind of a guy' MBS in blunt remarks</a>&nbsp;US President Donald Trump has sent 15-point peace plan to Iran. While Iran has ruled out direct negotiations, it has said that it exchanged messages with the US via “friendly countries.” Pakistan has presented itself as a key mediator and on Sunday said that it is ready to "host and facilitate meaningful talks." Outlining growing support for its peace efforts, including from the United Nations and China, Pakistan issued a statement after its Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar held "very productive talks" with Foreign ministers of Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey in Islamabad.&nbsp;&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.&nbsp;

Trump says a regime change has occurred in Iran and the US is in “meaningful talks” despite bombing the country twice, triggering a month-long war. Iran’s new leader Mojtaba Khamenei is reportedly wounded. Pakistan offers to host peace talks as Trump signals a possible deal soon.

US President Donald Trump has said that a regime change has already happened in Iran, adding that the United States is having very meaningful conversation with the Iranians. However, maintaining that one can never know with Iran, Trump accepted that the US has bombed the country amid negotiations for two times - one in 2025 with B2 bombers and other on Feb 28, that has led to a month- long war. Reiterating that the Iran war is “ahead of schedule”, Trump said that the US is dealing with a “completely different set of people” who are reasonable. He said that there can be a deal with Tehran “pretty soon.” About the new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, Trump said that he may be alive but he is seriously wounded. Hinting a green light towards the peace plan, Trump said that the Iranians have responded and even gave several ships of oil boats as gift that passed through the Strait of Hormuz. "The one regime was decimated, destroyed, they're all dead. The next regime is mostly dead. And the third regime, we're dealing with different people than anybody's dealt with before. It's a whole different group of people. So I would consider that regime change. And frankly, they've been very reasonable. So I think we've had regime change. We can't do much better than that. The regime that was really bad, really evil, was the first one. That was done. The second was appointed, and they're gone. They're all dead,” the president told reporters aboard Air Force One. About a possible deal, "I think we'll make a deal with them, pretty sure...but we've had regime change," he said. Elsewhere during his conversation, he said that Iran is decimated and they will to give up nuclear weapons. On Iran charging tolls from ships crossing the Hormuz, Trump said he will find out about it. Hailing the Gulf nations for fighting back, Trump said, “They are fighting back. Saudi Arabia is fighting back hard. Qatar is fighting back. UAE is fighting back. Kuwait's fighting back. Bahrain's fighting back. They're all fighting back. Actually, they were surprised to be hit. I was very surprised they got hit. And once they got hit, they started fighting very well.” Also Read: 'By 12 noon...': Iran issues ultimatum to US universities in West Asia after attack on campuses in Tehran What we know about the Iran war so far? The war began on February 28, when the United States and Israel carried out pre-emptive airstrikes across Iran. The subsequent escalation reportedly resulted in the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, triggering a broad Iranian retaliation targeting not just Israel but also US bases across Gulf countries. Also Read: 'Kissing my a**': Trump mocks Saudi's 'very regular kind of a guy' MBS in blunt remarks US President Donald Trump has sent 15-point peace plan to Iran. While Iran has ruled out direct negotiations, it has said that it exchanged messages with the US via “friendly countries.” Pakistan has presented itself as a key mediator and on Sunday said that it is ready to "host and facilitate meaningful talks." Outlining growing support for its peace efforts, including from the United Nations and China, Pakistan issued a statement after its Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar held "very productive talks" with Foreign ministers of Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey in Islamabad. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Trump says a regime change has occurred in Iran and the US is in “meaningful talks” despite bombing the country twice, triggering a month-long war. Iran’s new leader Mojtaba Khamenei is reportedly wounded. Pakistan offers to host peace talks as Trump signals a possible deal soon.

‘Regime change has happened’: Trump issues BIG statement after a month of Iran war, hints at peace deal ‘pretty soon’

Pakistan said on Sunday (March 29, 2026) that it is ready to "host and facilitate meaningful talks" between the United States and Iran to bring an end to the month-long war that has destabilise the region. Outlining growing support for its peace efforts, including from the United Nations and China, Pakistan issued a statement after its Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar held "very productive talks" with Foreign ministers of Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey in Islamabad. In a televised statement, Dar said that the visitors “expressed their full support” for potential US-Iran talks in Islamabad. Batting for “dialogue and diplomacy”, Pakistan said that both Iran and the US have “expressed their confidence” in Islamabad to facilitate the talks.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">🔊PR No.8️⃣2️⃣/2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣6️⃣ Statement by the Deputy Prime Minister /Foreign Minister Senator Mohammad Ishaq Dar at the Conclusion of 2nd Meeting of Four Foreign Ministers 🔗⬇️ <a href="https://t.co/JpUbUdhzLb">pic.twitter.com/JpUbUdhzLb</a>&mdash; Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Pakistan (@ForeignOfficePk) <a href="https://twitter.com/ForeignOfficePk/status/2038312594147271059?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 29, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-irgc-issues-ultimatum-to-us-universities-in-west-asia-after-attack-on-campuses-in-tehran-1774741664288/amp">'By 12 noon...': Iran issues ultimatum to US universities in West Asia after attack on campuses in Tehran</a><h2>Pakistan as a mediator</h2>Pakistan is counting on its longstanding links with Tehran and close contacts in the Gulf, as well as the personal rapport that Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and the country’s powerful Army Chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, have struck up with US President Donald Trump in the past few days. Dar and Sharif have held several calls with senior government ministers in Iran, including President Masoud Pezeshkian and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, and were “actively engaged” with the US administration, the foreign minister said. The Pak Foreign Ministry statement also said that Dar spoke to his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi and UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, adding that they “fully support” Pakistan’s push for peace, as do other governments around the world.&nbsp;Pakistan’s efforts make economic sense as it relies on oil and gas imports through the Strait of Hormuz. Continued disruption to shipping could worsen fuel supplies, driving up prices and forcing further austerity measures. Iran had allowed 20 more Pakistani-flagged vessels to pass through the Strait after it started the mediation in the war.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-mocks-saudi-s-very-regular-kind-of-a-guy-mohammad-bin-salman-in-blunt-remarks-1774755156132">'Kissing my a**': Trump mocks Saudi's 'very regular kind of a guy' MBS in blunt remarks</a>&nbsp;Sunday’s talks, held under tight security and with no US, Israeli or Iranian representation, addressed efforts to stop the conflict from spreading and to encourage “a negotiations track” between Tehran and Washington to prevent the region “slipping into a state of complete chaos”, Cairo said.All three visiting ministers — Badr Abdelatty from Egypt, Hakan Fidan from Turkey, and Saudi Arabia’s Faisal bin Farhan — also met Pak PM Sharif as well as Asim Munir.<h2>How the war began?</h2>The war began on February 28, when the United States and Israel carried out pre-emptive airstrikes across Iran. The subsequent escalation reportedly resulted in the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, triggering a broad Iranian retaliation targeting not just Israel but also US bases across Gulf countries.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.&nbsp;

Pakistan offered to host US-Iran peace talks amid rising regional tensions. Backed by UN, China, and Middle Eastern allies, Islamabad is pushing diplomacy to end the conflict, protect trade routes, and stabilise the region while leveraging strong ties with both Tehran and Washington.

Pakistan said on Sunday (March 29, 2026) that it is ready to "host and facilitate meaningful talks" between the United States and Iran to bring an end to the month-long war that has destabilise the region. Outlining growing support for its peace efforts, including from the United Nations and China, Pakistan issued a statement after its Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar held "very productive talks" with Foreign ministers of Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey in Islamabad. In a televised statement, Dar said that the visitors “expressed their full support” for potential US-Iran talks in Islamabad. Batting for “dialogue and diplomacy”, Pakistan said that both Iran and the US have “expressed their confidence” in Islamabad to facilitate the talks.

Pakistan offered to host US-Iran peace talks amid rising regional tensions. Backed by UN, China, and Middle Eastern allies, Islamabad is pushing diplomacy to end the conflict, protect trade routes, and stabilise the region while leveraging strong ties with both Tehran and Washington.

'To host meaningful talks': Pakistan 'honoured' to mediate Iran-US war after Gulf FMs meet, with China’s support

The Iranian military on Sunday again issued a warning to US President Donald Trump against any “ground operations and occupation of some islands” in the Persian Gulf, saying American forces would “become good food for the sharks of the Persian Gulf” if they made any such attempt. Ebrahim Zolfaqari, Brigadier General and spokesperson for Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, issued the warning in a video statement, intensifying the exchange of verbal attacks. In the latest video released by Khatam al-Anbia Central Headquarters, Zolfaghari said that US troops would become “good food for the sharks of the Persian Gulf” if they attempted a ground invasion of Iran.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-s-supreme-leader-mojtaba-khamenei-thanks-iraqi-people-for-their-support-state-media-1774806982822">Iran’s supreme leader Mojtaba Khamenei thanks Iraqi people for their support: State media</a>&nbsp;Zolfaqari also accused Trump of being under pressure from the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad due to his links with the Epstein case and called him a “pawn” of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.“There is no doubt that the US president is under pressure from the terrorist organisation Mossad due to his background in the Epstein case and has become a pawn of the Israeli prime minister in the war and aggression against Iran,” he said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israeli-military-days-away-from-hitting-all-its-top-priority-targets-in-iran-1774788156871">Israeli military just days away from hitting all its ‘top priority’ targets in Iran, says IDF spokesperson</a>&nbsp;Zolfaqari said Iran’s military is “counting down the moments” for the annihilation of US forces in case any ground attack or occupation attempt is launched.&nbsp;“American commanders and soldiers will become good food for the sharks of the Persian Gulf,” he added.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/foreign-ministers-of-regional-powers-hold-quadrilateral-talks-in-pakistan-for-iran-war-de-escalation-1774794127899">Saudi, Egypt and Turkey foreign ministers hold quadrilateral talks in Pakistan for Iran war de-escalation</a>&nbsp;He said that the Army of the Islamic Republic has been waiting to prove that aggression and occupation will result in nothing but humiliating captivity, dismemberment, and the disappearance of the aggressors.&nbsp;The military spokesperson’s warning comes amid several media reports that the Pentagon has been preparing plans for ground operations, potentially including raids on Kharg Island and sites near the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;Media reports said that the US is considering sending around 10,000 troops to the Middle East, possibly as part of plans to carry out a ground attack on Iran. Trump has not yet approved any deployment.

Ebrahim Zolfaqari, brigadier general and spokesperson for Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, said the Army has been waiting to prove that aggression and occupation will result in nothing but humiliating captivity, dismemberment, and disappearance of aggressors.

The Iranian military on Sunday again issued a warning to US President Donald Trump against any “ground operations and occupation of some islands” in the Persian Gulf, saying American forces would “become good food for the sharks of the Persian Gulf” if they made any such attempt. Ebrahim Zolfaqari, Brigadier General and spokesperson for Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, issued the warning in a video statement, intensifying the exchange of verbal attacks. In the latest video released by Khatam al-Anbia Central Headquarters, Zolfaghari said that US troops would become “good food for the sharks of the Persian Gulf” if they attempted a ground invasion of Iran. Also Read: Iran’s supreme leader Mojtaba Khamenei thanks Iraqi people for their support: State media Zolfaqari also accused Trump of being under pressure from the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad due to his links with the Epstein case and called him a “pawn” of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. “There is no doubt that the US president is under pressure from the terrorist organisation Mossad due to his background in the Epstein case and has become a pawn of the Israeli prime minister in the war and aggression against Iran,” he said. Also Read: Israeli military just days away from hitting all its ‘top priority’ targets in Iran, says IDF spokesperson Zolfaqari said Iran’s military is “counting down the moments” for the annihilation of US forces in case any ground attack or occupation attempt is launched. “American commanders and soldiers will become good food for the sharks of the Persian Gulf,” he added. Also Read: Saudi, Egypt and Turkey foreign ministers hold quadrilateral talks in Pakistan for Iran war de-escalation He said that the Army of the Islamic Republic has been waiting to prove that aggression and occupation will result in nothing but humiliating captivity, dismemberment, and the disappearance of the aggressors. The military spokesperson’s warning comes amid several media reports that the Pentagon has been preparing plans for ground operations, potentially including raids on Kharg Island and sites near the Strait of Hormuz. Media reports said that the US is considering sending around 10,000 troops to the Middle East, possibly as part of plans to carry out a ground attack on Iran. Trump has not yet approved any deployment.

Ebrahim Zolfaqari, brigadier general and spokesperson for Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, said the Army has been waiting to prove that aggression and occupation will result in nothing but humiliating captivity, dismemberment, and disappearance of aggressors.

‘US troops will be good food for Persian Gulf sharks’: Iran again warns against ground assault

US-Iran war enters day 30 with strikes across Iran, Lebanon and Gulf bases. Here’s a full breakdown of escalation, the Kharg Island battle and global impact

US-Iran war enters day 30 with strikes across Iran, Lebanon and Gulf bases. Here’s a full breakdown of escalation, the Kharg Island battle and global impact

US-Iran war day 30: Kharg Island showdown, regional escalation and global market shock

US President Donald Trump on Friday evening said that he surrounds himself with “losers” because he “likes people who listen to my success”. He said that he doesn't like successful people, as he doesn't like to listen to their “success stories”. He made those comments while acknowledging the controversial nature of the comment, he told the crowd, "I'm only kidding... eh, sort of".Trump was at the Saudi-backed conference Future Investment Initiative (FII) summit in Miami.&nbsp;“I always like to hang around with losers, actually, because it makes me feel better. I hate guys who are very, very successful, and you have to listen to their success stories. I like people who like to listen to my success," said Trump. He made the comment &nbsp;in a question-and-answer round following his lengthy speech. He suggested that they could discuss "sex" or “whatever the hell you want."Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/bibi-files-netanyahu-documentary-adelson-hamas-funding-1774776776301">The Bibi Files: What the viral Netanyahu documentary reveals about corruption, Adelson ties and Hamas funding</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Trump: I hang out with losers because it makes be feel better. I hate guys that are very, very successful and you have to listen to their success stories. I like people that like to listen to my success. <a href="https://t.co/OYNXspphxo">pic.twitter.com/OYNXspphxo</a>&mdash; Acyn (@Acyn) <a href="https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/2037662805558517844?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 27, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Trump also heaped some praise on the late IRGC general Qasem Soleimani, who was killed by the US in 2020. He characterised Soleimani as a "great leader" and a "mad genius," but called him a "vicious, horrible human being". He further explained the leader label, saying, "if you define a leader in a certain way- a very powerful leader". He claimed that the Iranian leadership was happy when Soleimani was eliminated. Iranian leadership was “extremely happy”, adding that they wouldn't, but he was very powerful and "nobody’s going to be asking them anymore because they’re not here either". He suggested that the Iranian leadership is not there, and nobody wants to be their leader anymore. He said that the “supreme leader” is no more “supreme” and the son is either dead or severely injured, as no one has heard or seen him. “Their leaders are all dead… Their supreme leader is no longer supreme. He's dead,” he said and further added, “Iran's navy is gone… their air force is totally, completely dead.” He claimed that they were "begging” to make a deal. &nbsp;Trump's comments were part of a broader response to the questions regarding global leadership, where he stated that "winning" is the most important factor.

Donald Trump says he prefers “losers” over successful people, praises Qasem Soleimani and makes explosive claims about Iran at the FII summit in Miami.

US President Donald Trump on Friday evening said that he surrounds himself with “losers” because he “likes people who listen to my success”. He said that he doesn't like successful people, as he doesn't like to listen to their “success stories”. He made those comments while acknowledging the controversial nature of the comment, he told the crowd, "I'm only kidding... eh, sort of".Trump was at the Saudi-backed conference Future Investment Initiative (FII) summit in Miami. “I always like to hang around with losers, actually, because it makes me feel better. I hate guys who are very, very successful, and you have to listen to their success stories. I like people who like to listen to my success," said Trump. He made the comment in a question-and-answer round following his lengthy speech. He suggested that they could discuss "sex" or “whatever the hell you want." Also Read: The Bibi Files: What the viral Netanyahu documentary reveals about corruption, Adelson ties and Hamas funding

Donald Trump says he prefers “losers” over successful people, praises Qasem Soleimani and makes explosive claims about Iran at the FII summit in Miami.

Donald Trump says he surrounds himself with 'losers' because it makes him 'feel better'

There is a line, and all of us in the business know that it exists. We go towards danger, and our job is to not be the danger. Lately, however, that line seems to be disappear. Journalists are being killed, captured, and intimidated, not as bystanders, but as inconvenient truth-tellers. Let’s stop glossing over it. This is not just a war. This is a war against the truth. Stories have been written about how many journalists have died in airstrikes while simply doing what they were sent to do: report the truth. They wore press vests. They stood in front of cameras. They clearly identified themselves. They still died.&nbsp;Take the case of Fatima Ftouni, a journalist with Al-Mayadeen. On March 28, 2026, she was in a clearly marked media vehicle in the south of Lebanon, en route to a story she had to write. An Israeli strike hit the media vehicle she was in. She survived the first strike, reportedly stepping out and attempting to run away. A second strike followed. This strike killed her.&nbsp;She was not the only journalist killed in the strike. Her brother, Mohamad Ftouni, a freelance cameraman, also died in the strike. So did another journalist, Ali Shoeib, a veteran journalist. They were not hiding. They were not armed. They were just doing their job. Israel claimed to have targeted one of them, alleging that they had ties to militants, but failed to account for the others who died in the same strike.&nbsp;These are not grey areas. These are documented cases of journalists being hit while doing their jobs. These are not statistics. These are names. Faces. Stories that will now never be told. And then came the now-viral moment, where a CNN journalist was reportedly detained by Israeli forces in Lebanon while filming. Not firing a weapon. Not provoking violence. Just filming.&nbsp;But more than that, I feel something else: a sense of betrayal. Because journalism is founded on a precarious pledge: that in the midst of even the most brutal conflicts, there will be someone left to tell the tale. We are urged to be objective: to report without emotion. But objectivity is not an excuse to remain silent in the face of injustice.&nbsp;For when we target journalists, objectivity becomes complicity. When a journalist dies, it’s not just a life that’s been lost; it’s a story that’s been killed too. Accountability weakened. And when we arrest someone for reporting on a story, we send a rather chilling message: there are some truths we’d rather not reveal.&nbsp;That is not acceptable. We did not sign up to be silenced. We did not sign up to die for holding a camera. We signed up to bear witness. To go where the truth is uncomfortable. To ask questions power would rather avoid. To show people what is really happening, especially when someone wants it hidden. Yes, war reporting has always been a dangerous profession. But there is a difference between danger and targeting. One is risk. The other is suppression. And the more we accept this, the more we accept that the truth itself becomes a casualty.&nbsp;And today, it’s journalists in Lebanon. Tomorrow, it could be journalists anywhere in the world. Because once we accept that truth-telling journalists are dispensable, then no story is sacred and no society is informed. So, to answer the question, this is not just another headline. This is a warning. Because the day journalists become targets…is the day truth becomes optional. And that’s a more dangerous world than any war zone.&nbsp;Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.

Journalists killed in Lebanon highlight a growing war on truth, where reporting facts is becoming as dangerous as the conflict itself

There is a line, and all of us in the business know that it exists. We go towards danger, and our job is to not be the danger. Lately, however, that line seems to be disappear. Journalists are being killed, captured, and intimidated, not as bystanders, but as inconvenient truth-tellers. Let’s stop glossing over it. This is not just a war. This is a war against the truth. Stories have been written about how many journalists have died in airstrikes while simply doing what they were sent to do: report the truth. They wore press vests. They stood in front of cameras. They clearly identified themselves. They still died. Take the case of Fatima Ftouni, a journalist with Al-Mayadeen. On March 28, 2026, she was in a clearly marked media vehicle in the south of Lebanon, en route to a story she had to write. An Israeli strike hit the media vehicle she was in. She survived the first strike, reportedly stepping out and attempting to run away. A second strike followed. This strike killed her. She was not the only journalist killed in the strike. Her brother, Mohamad Ftouni, a freelance cameraman, also died in the strike. So did another journalist, Ali Shoeib, a veteran journalist. They were not hiding. They were not armed. They were just doing their job. Israel claimed to have targeted one of them, alleging that they had ties to militants, but failed to account for the others who died in the same strike. These are not grey areas. These are documented cases of journalists being hit while doing their jobs. These are not statistics. These are names. Faces. Stories that will now never be told. And then came the now-viral moment, where a CNN journalist was reportedly detained by Israeli forces in Lebanon while filming. Not firing a weapon. Not provoking violence. Just filming. But more than that, I feel something else: a sense of betrayal. Because journalism is founded on a precarious pledge: that in the midst of even the most brutal conflicts, there will be someone left to tell the tale. We are urged to be objective: to report without emotion. But objectivity is not an excuse to remain silent in the face of injustice. For when we target journalists, objectivity becomes complicity. When a journalist dies, it’s not just a life that’s been lost; it’s a story that’s been killed too. Accountability weakened. And when we arrest someone for reporting on a story, we send a rather chilling message: there are some truths we’d rather not reveal. That is not acceptable. We did not sign up to be silenced. We did not sign up to die for holding a camera. We signed up to bear witness. To go where the truth is uncomfortable. To ask questions power would rather avoid. To show people what is really happening, especially when someone wants it hidden. Yes, war reporting has always been a dangerous profession. But there is a difference between danger and targeting. One is risk. The other is suppression. And the more we accept this, the more we accept that the truth itself becomes a casualty. And today, it’s journalists in Lebanon. Tomorrow, it could be journalists anywhere in the world. Because once we accept that truth-telling journalists are dispensable, then no story is sacred and no society is informed. So, to answer the question, this is not just another headline. This is a warning. Because the day journalists become targets…is the day truth becomes optional. And that’s a more dangerous world than any war zone. Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.

Targeting journalists in war zones exposes a grim reality, truth is under attack, and those risking their lives to report are no longer protected

They were there to report. They never came back

US conservative podcaster Tucker Carlson released the documentary “The Bibi Files” on his news network, TCN (Tucker Carlson Network). The content of the documentary has gone viral on social media. The documentary highlights the corruption cases of the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his controversial relationship with Miriam and Sheldon Adelson and his encouragement of funding Hamas to delegitimise the claims of a Palestinian state.&nbsp;<h2>What are the contents of “The Bibi Files”?</h2>The documentary “The Bibi Files” is banned in Israel. Tucker Carlson, the conservative commentator, has been critical of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu long before the start of the US-Iran war. Promoting the film, Carlson said, “This film exposes years of stories the Netanyahu government wants to keep hidden.” The central theme of the film revolves around Netanyahu's attemot at prolonging the conflict in the region, so that he is under a political shield and avoids imprisonment. &nbsp;“Featuring insider testimony and leaked interrogation footage, this new documentary reveals a side of power that regular citizens were never meant to see. As America dives deeper into the Iran War, understanding who is pulling the strings matters more than ever,” read the note.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-troop-deployment-west-asia-uss-tripoli-iran-war-1774770314866">US deploys 3,500 troops to West Asia as USS Tripoli enters Iran war theatre</a><h2>Netanyahu's controversial relationship with Miriam and Sheldon Adelson</h2>The documentary features testimonies from US billionaire Miriam and Sheldon Adelson. This went viral because Adelsons were one of the biggest Republican donors for US President Donald Trump's every election campaign. The narrator reportedly uses the term "sugar daddy" to describe how Netanyahu would expect billionaires around the world to pay for their lavish lifestyle. The documentary describes Sheldon Adelson as Netanyahu's “cigar guy”, Benjamin and Sara Netanyahu would constantly demands for gifts and favourable media coverage in his newspaper, Israel Hayom. There were code words like &nbsp;“Leaves” for High-end cigars, “Roses” for Pink champagne and “Dwarves” for Luxury dress shirts. Arnon Milchan, whose production credits include “Pretty Woman,” “12 Years a Slave,” and “Bohemian Rhapsody,” is a key witness in one of three cases brought against Netanyahu. In one recording, Miriam Adelson could be heard saying, “If this comes out, I would be dead.” Miriam also detailed how Sara would "hint" for expensive gifts, such as Tiffany necklaces, by showing off items given to her by other billionaires. Sara would frequently call Mariam and scream loudly about the media coverage. Miriam would put the receiver down for 5 to 10 minutes until the shouting stopped. On one ocassion Sheldon said, "Israel would be better off if she didn't put her nose into his politics". He further described her as "very unforgiving" and questioned whether he should continue the friendship. The relationship was further strained when Benjamin Netanyahu allegedly offered to weaken Adelson's newspaper, Israel Hayom, in exchange for more favourable coverage in the newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth.<h2>Netanyahu facilitated the funding of Hamas</h2>Benjamin Netanyahu's government facilitated the transfer of millions of Qatari dollars into Gaza. The payment began in 2018, it was distributed to the people of Gaza directly, and Shin Bet would monitor the list of recipients to try to ensure that members of Hamas’s military wing would not directly benefit.Netanyahu rejected internal proposals for a pre-emptive strike against Hamas leadership in 2016. A policy intended to keep Hamas strong enough not to have a legitimate political movement for the Palestinian state. They would treat the Palestinian Authority as a “burden” and Hamas as a “ political asset”. The plan was to divide the power between the Gaza Strip, run by Hamas and the West Bank, run by the Palestinian Authority. The film further claims that the colonial “divide and rule” policy was continued despite reports of a security threat. Qatar was roughly sending $35 million a month to Hamas, in cash, which amounts to more than $1billion. Avigdor Lieberman, former Defence Minister of Israel, who resigned from the position, said that the 2023 attack was blowback of the 2018 decision to send money to Hamas.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">OH. MY. GOD. There it is… from his mouth 🚨 Netanyahu Funded Hamas $35M a Month via Qatar, using U.S. Tax Dollars, and tells Investigators: “This is confidential and can’t be leaked, okay? We have neighbors here, sworn enemies. I’m constantly passing them messages. I confuse… <a href="https://t.co/pROxaO7aWY">https://t.co/pROxaO7aWY</a> <a href="https://t.co/sMK8xMZmvd">pic.twitter.com/sMK8xMZmvd</a>&mdash; MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) <a href="https://twitter.com/MJTruthUltra/status/2037717030799856125?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 28, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Ron Paul 2009: “If you look at the history, you’ll find out that Hamas was really started by Israel because they wanted Hamas to counter Yasser Arafat..” Imagine the problem. —— Netanyahu Make them a problem. —— Tell the world about the boogeymen. Fund the problem. ——… <a href="https://t.co/EuM8CVVs6f">https://t.co/EuM8CVVs6f</a> <a href="https://t.co/LmuaXLTldN">pic.twitter.com/LmuaXLTldN</a>&mdash; MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) <a href="https://twitter.com/MJTruthUltra/status/2038089153993150772?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 29, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">HOLEE SHYT‼️ Is this what she meant when she said, “If this coms out, I’m dead?” 🚨 During her police interrogation, Israeli-American billionaire Miriam Adelson stated that Sara Netanyahu would subtly &quot;hint&quot; that she wanted expensive luxury gifts, such as high-end jewelry.… <a href="https://t.co/YEbjGjPgAJ">https://t.co/YEbjGjPgAJ</a> <a href="https://t.co/kZrXyu5VwO">pic.twitter.com/kZrXyu5VwO</a>&mdash; MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) <a href="https://twitter.com/MJTruthUltra/status/2037652474019066265?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 27, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">I did not know this… 🚨 Benjamin &quot;Bibi&quot; Netanyahu was being blackmailed over an extramarital affair while married to his wife Sara An anonymous caller phoned Sara and threatened to release a compromising sex tape of Netanyahu with another woman unless he dropped out of the… <a href="https://t.co/ZvzRMNojaT">https://t.co/ZvzRMNojaT</a> <a href="https://t.co/XIG5QYjCOe">pic.twitter.com/XIG5QYjCOe</a>&mdash; MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) <a href="https://twitter.com/MJTruthUltra/status/2037639480614531176?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 27, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Netanyahu and the ‘hot tape scandal’</h2>An anonymous caller phoned Sara and threatened to release a compromising sex tape of Netanyahu with another woman unless he dropped out of the Likud party leadership race. The next day, Netanyahu went on live Israeli television and confessed: “There was indeed such a thing. This ended a couple of months ago. This is a private matter.” According to the film, this was a foundational moment in the life of Netanyahu, since when he would frame political challenges as victimhood, a tactic used to manage his public image and his relationship with Sara.&nbsp;

The Bibi Files has gone viral for its explosive claims about Benjamin Netanyahu, from corruption allegations and ties with billionaire donors to controversial policies involving Gaza. Here’s a fact-checked breakdown of what the film claims and what is supported by evidence.

US conservative podcaster Tucker Carlson released the documentary “The Bibi Files” on his news network, TCN (Tucker Carlson Network). The content of the documentary has gone viral on social media. The documentary highlights the corruption cases of the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his controversial relationship with Miriam and Sheldon Adelson and his encouragement of funding Hamas to delegitimise the claims of a Palestinian state. What are the contents of “The Bibi Files”? The documentary “The Bibi Files” is banned in Israel. Tucker Carlson, the conservative commentator, has been critical of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu long before the start of the US-Iran war. Promoting the film, Carlson said, “This film exposes years of stories the Netanyahu government wants to keep hidden.” The central theme of the film revolves around Netanyahu's attemot at prolonging the conflict in the region, so that he is under a political shield and avoids imprisonment. “Featuring insider testimony and leaked interrogation footage, this new documentary reveals a side of power that regular citizens were never meant to see. As America dives deeper into the Iran War, understanding who is pulling the strings matters more than ever,” read the note. Also Read: US deploys 3,500 troops to West Asia as USS Tripoli enters Iran war theatre Netanyahu's controversial relationship with Miriam and Sheldon Adelson The documentary features testimonies from US billionaire Miriam and Sheldon Adelson. This went viral because Adelsons were one of the biggest Republican donors for US President Donald Trump's every election campaign. The narrator reportedly uses the term "sugar daddy" to describe how Netanyahu would expect billionaires around the world to pay for their lavish lifestyle. The documentary describes Sheldon Adelson as Netanyahu's “cigar guy”, Benjamin and Sara Netanyahu would constantly demands for gifts and favourable media coverage in his newspaper, Israel Hayom. There were code words like “Leaves” for High-end cigars, “Roses” for Pink champagne and “Dwarves” for Luxury dress shirts. Arnon Milchan, whose production credits include “Pretty Woman,” “12 Years a Slave,” and “Bohemian Rhapsody,” is a key witness in one of three cases brought against Netanyahu. In one recording, Miriam Adelson could be heard saying, “If this comes out, I would be dead.” Miriam also detailed how Sara would "hint" for expensive gifts, such as Tiffany necklaces, by showing off items given to her by other billionaires. Sara would frequently call Mariam and scream loudly about the media coverage. Miriam would put the receiver down for 5 to 10 minutes until the shouting stopped. On one ocassion Sheldon said, "Israel would be better off if she didn't put her nose into his politics". He further described her as "very unforgiving" and questioned whether he should continue the friendship. The relationship was further strained when Benjamin Netanyahu allegedly offered to weaken Adelson's newspaper, Israel Hayom, in exchange for more favourable coverage in the newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth. Netanyahu facilitated the funding of Hamas Benjamin Netanyahu's government facilitated the transfer of millions of Qatari dollars into Gaza. The payment began in 2018, it was distributed to the people of Gaza directly, and Shin Bet would monitor the list of recipients to try to ensure that members of Hamas’s military wing would not directly benefit. Netanyahu rejected internal proposals for a pre-emptive strike against Hamas leadership in 2016. A policy intended to keep Hamas strong enough not to have a legitimate political movement for the Palestinian state. They would treat the Palestinian Authority as a “burden” and Hamas as a “ political asset”. The plan was to divide the power between the Gaza Strip, run by Hamas and the West Bank, run by the Palestinian Authority. The film further claims that the colonial “divide and rule” policy was continued despite reports of a security threat. Qatar was roughly sending $35 million a month to Hamas, in cash, which amounts to more than $1billion. Avigdor Lieberman, former Defence Minister of Israel, who resigned from the position, said that the 2023 attack was blowback of the 2018 decision to send money to Hamas.

The Bibi Files has gone viral for its explosive claims about Benjamin Netanyahu, from corruption allegations and ties with billionaire donors to controversial policies involving Gaza. Here’s a fact-checked breakdown of what the film claims and what is supported by evidence.

The Bibi Files: What the viral Netanyahu documentary reveals about corruption, Adelson ties and Hamas funding

The US Central Command has announced that USS Tripoli, carrying a task force of 3,500 Marines and sailors have reached West Asia on March 27. The war between the US and Iran reached the 30th day. The amphibious assault vessel was redirected from its home base in Sasebo, Japan. It made a brief stop at the Diego Garcia base before entering the war theatre. The US CENTCOM has confirmed it in a social media post as US President Donald Trump prepares to deploy troops in West Asia. This is the latest development as US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the US could achieve its objective in Iran without deploying ground troops.<h2>What is the USS Tripoli?&nbsp;</h2>USS Tripoli is an America-class amphibious assault ship that consists of “the Tripoli Amphibious Ready Group and 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit composed of about 3,500 Sailors and Marines, in addition to transport and strike fighter aircraft, as well as amphibious assault and tactical assets.” It is 844 feet in length, with a speed of over 20 knots, and a displacement capacity of approximately 44,000 long tons. It has the capability of carrying at least 20 F-35B stealth fighters, along with MV-22 Osprey aircraft and helicopters.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/cyclone-narelle-red-sky-western-australia-explained-1774758985341">Apocalyptic' red sky in Australia ahead of Tropical Cyclone Narelle</a><h2>What other naval assets are there in the Persian Gulf?</h2>The US CENTCOM has already deployed the USS Abraham Lincoln and USS Gerald Ford in the West Asian theatre of war. The British Royal Navy has deployed HMS Anson to the northern Arabian Sea. USS Gerald Ford has recently exited the West Asian theatre to Split, Croatia, on March 28, 2026. There were several claims from Iran affilated news outlets of a successful strike on the USS Gerald Ford. However, CENTCOM on March 12 denied such claims, it said that a "non-combat-related" fire had broken out in the ship's main laundry facility, so it moved for repair and maintenance purposes. The US has further announced the mobilisation of the 82nd Airborne Division of 1,000-3,000 paratroopers led by Major General Brandon Tegtmeier.&nbsp;<h2>What are the objectives?</h2>The objectives were not clearly articulated. But several reports suggest that the US is preparing for an assault on the Kharg Island, the main port for Iranian oil export, and to secure the vital trade choke point Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;&nbsp;

USS Tripoli reaches West Asia with 3,500 Marines as US-Iran war escalates. Here’s what the warship carries and the latest military developments.

The US Central Command has announced that USS Tripoli, carrying a task force of 3,500 Marines and sailors have reached West Asia on March 27. The war between the US and Iran reached the 30th day. The amphibious assault vessel was redirected from its home base in Sasebo, Japan. It made a brief stop at the Diego Garcia base before entering the war theatre. The US CENTCOM has confirmed it in a social media post as US President Donald Trump prepares to deploy troops in West Asia. This is the latest development as US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the US could achieve its objective in Iran without deploying ground troops. What is the USS Tripoli? USS Tripoli is an America-class amphibious assault ship that consists of “the Tripoli Amphibious Ready Group and 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit composed of about 3,500 Sailors and Marines, in addition to transport and strike fighter aircraft, as well as amphibious assault and tactical assets.” It is 844 feet in length, with a speed of over 20 knots, and a displacement capacity of approximately 44,000 long tons. It has the capability of carrying at least 20 F-35B stealth fighters, along with MV-22 Osprey aircraft and helicopters. Also read: Apocalyptic' red sky in Australia ahead of Tropical Cyclone Narelle What other naval assets are there in the Persian Gulf? The US CENTCOM has already deployed the USS Abraham Lincoln and USS Gerald Ford in the West Asian theatre of war. The British Royal Navy has deployed HMS Anson to the northern Arabian Sea. USS Gerald Ford has recently exited the West Asian theatre to Split, Croatia, on March 28, 2026. There were several claims from Iran affilated news outlets of a successful strike on the USS Gerald Ford. However, CENTCOM on March 12 denied such claims, it said that a "non-combat-related" fire had broken out in the ship's main laundry facility, so it moved for repair and maintenance purposes. The US has further announced the mobilisation of the 82nd Airborne Division of 1,000-3,000 paratroopers led by Major General Brandon Tegtmeier. What are the objectives? The objectives were not clearly articulated. But several reports suggest that the US is preparing for an assault on the Kharg Island, the main port for Iranian oil export, and to secure the vital trade choke point Strait of Hormuz.

USS Tripoli reaches West Asia with 3,500 Marines as US-Iran war escalates. Here’s what the warship carries and the latest military developments.

US deploys 3,500 troops to West Asia as USS Tripoli enters Iran war theatre

Diesel prices have surged 45% since the beginning of the US‑Iran conflict, reflecting growing tensions in West Asia and disruptions to global energy markets. The spike is impacting transport, industry, and consumers worldwide, as nations grapple with rising fuel costs and supply uncertainties. Analysts warn that continued escalation in the region could push diesel prices even higher, further straining global economies and energy security.


US-Iran War: Diesel Up 45% Since US-Iran Conflict Began

U.S. and Israeli forces have launched strikes on an **Iranian port city near the strategic Strait of Hormuz, marking yet another major escalation in the ongoing US‑Israel war with Iran. Iranian state media report that the attacks hit a quay and other infrastructure, killing several people and drawing sharp international concern as tensions surge in the Gulf and global markets react to risks around energy supplies and regional security.


US-Israel War with Iran: US & Israeli Strikes Hit Iranian Port Near Strait of Hormuz 

us-iran-war

Us Iran War, News on Us Iran War, stories on Us Iran War, articles on Us Iran War, Us Iran War stories at Wion, Us Iran War news, Us Iran War latest news

us iran-war

Global tensions, market slowdown: Maharashtra holds property rates steady

IRGC warns of attacks on major US firms in Gulf. Which companies are on list

China, Pakistan put forward 5-point proposal for Gulf and West Asia

Can Trump ‘take’ Iran’s oil? Here’s what would happen if he does so

Karoline Leavitt defends Trump amid Pope Leo XIV criticism over prayer and war

Washington vs NATO: Poland, France and Italy push back on US war demands

Airstrike knocks out key Iran desalination plant on Qeshm Island

Iran's Ghalibaf slams Trump calls pre-market 'news' a 'pump' and 'dump' scheme

Kadyrov’s forces ‘ready’ for Iran deployment as US-Israel campaign intensifies

Donald Trump may ask Gulf Nations to fund Iran war, says Karoline Leavitt

Pentagon denies reports linking Pete Hegseth's broker to defence investment

Gulf Nations urge Donald Trump to continue Iran offensive amid war concerns

Trump willing to end Iran war without reopening Strait of Hormuz? Report says...

As death rumours swirl, Netanyahu sits down for interview claiming Iran war past halfway; but refuses to give end date

'Once in a generation opportunity': White House on 'talks' with Iran

Amid US-Iran war, Red Sea cable threat raises fear of net disruption in India

‘Nuclear winter’ warning: UN diplomat steps down, cites safety concerns

Israel growth forecast cut amid war; economy seen expanding 3.3-3.8% in 2026

'We didn't...': Iran denies Pak's claim of hosting talks to end US-Iran war

Trump says ‘big day in Iran’ claims key targets destroyed amid diplomacy talks

Trump claims Iran cleared 20 ships as a 'sign of respect'

‘Iran has undergone regime change’: Trump's BIG statement after a month-long war

Pak says Islamabad ready 'to host meaningful talks' between Iran and US

‘US troops will be good food for Persian Gulf sharks’: Iran warns Trump

US-Iran war day 30: From regime change to securing Strait of Hormuz

Trump says he surrounds himself with 'losers' because it makes him 'feel better'