The Delhi High Court on Friday dismissed a petition by All India Students Association (AISA) national president Neha Bora challenging a notice requiring her to furnish a personal bond of ₹10,000 with one surety to maintain peace during an inquiry. Bora was detained during an anti-Chief Election Commissioner protest at Mandi House on October 16.Justice Subramonium Prasad, while pronouncing the order, said there were “adequate safeguards” in place. He directed the Special Executive Magistrate to “take care” and provide Bora with all relevant material before passing any order following the inquiry.<h2>Why did Bora challenge the notice?</h2>Bora approached the High Court seeking to quash the October 17 notice issued under Sections 126 and 130 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), read with Section 135(3). She also sought protection against coercive action by the authorities.The provisions allow magistrates to initiate preventive proceedings when information suggests that a person may disturb public peace. Under Section 135(3), a magistrate can require a person to execute a bond to maintain peace during an inquiry, subject to the statutory conditions.The petition argued that the notice did not identify material establishing a likelihood of breach of peace, a prerequisite for initiating proceedings under Section 126.<h2>Arguments before the court</h2>Senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, appearing for Bora, told the court that the October 16 gathering had been peaceful and that she had never called for violence. He also argued that seeking regime change was not objectionable in a democracy.Sankaranarayanan contended that the notice had been issued mechanically, arguing that a preliminary inquiry was necessary even before seeking an interim bond.Additional Solicitor General Sharma countered that Section 126 allowed a broad assessment based on the information received, which did not necessarily have to translate into evidence or established facts.<h2>What happened during the protest?</h2>According to the petition, Bora had called for a peaceful gathering at Mandi House at 5 pm on October 16 to unfurl the national flag at Central Park in Connaught Place as part of protests against the Chief Election Commissioner.She alleged that she was detained around 5:30 pm, taken to an undisclosed location and later moved to R.K. Puram Police Station. She remained there overnight and was released at 6 am on October 17.The notice, received on October 18, cited alleged sloganeering, repeated protests around Jantar Mantar despite prohibitory orders and claims that Bora had instigated people to join the Connaught Place gathering.

The Delhi High Court dismissed AISA chief Neha Bora’s plea challenging a ₹10,000 peace bond notice issued after her detention during an anti-CEC protest at Mandi House on October 16.

The Delhi High Court on Friday dismissed a petition by All India Students Association (AISA) national president Neha Bora challenging a notice requiring her to furnish a personal bond of ₹10,000 with one surety to maintain peace during an inquiry. Bora was detained during an anti-Chief Election Commissioner protest at Mandi House on October 16. Justice Subramonium Prasad, while pronouncing the order, said there were “adequate safeguards” in place. He directed the Special Executive Magistrate to “take care” and provide Bora with all relevant material before passing any order following the inquiry. Why did Bora challenge the notice? Bora approached the High Court seeking to quash the October 17 notice issued under Sections 126 and 130 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), read with Section 135(3). She also sought protection against coercive action by the authorities. The provisions allow magistrates to initiate preventive proceedings when information suggests that a person may disturb public peace. Under Section 135(3), a magistrate can require a person to execute a bond to maintain peace during an inquiry, subject to the statutory conditions. The petition argued that the notice did not identify material establishing a likelihood of breach of peace, a prerequisite for initiating proceedings under Section 126. Arguments before the court Senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, appearing for Bora, told the court that the October 16 gathering had been peaceful and that she had never called for violence. He also argued that seeking regime change was not objectionable in a democracy. Sankaranarayanan contended that the notice had been issued mechanically, arguing that a preliminary inquiry was necessary even before seeking an interim bond. Additional Solicitor General Sharma countered that Section 126 allowed a broad assessment based on the information received, which did not necessarily have to translate into evidence or established facts. What happened during the protest? According to the petition, Bora had called for a peaceful gathering at Mandi House at 5 pm on October 16 to unfurl the national flag at Central Park in Connaught Place as part of protests against the Chief Election Commissioner. She alleged that she was detained around 5:30 pm, taken to an undisclosed location and later moved to R.K. Puram Police Station. She remained there overnight and was released at 6 am on October 17. The notice, received on October 18, cited alleged sloganeering, repeated protests around Jantar Mantar despite prohibitory orders and claims that Bora had instigated people to join the Connaught Place gathering.

The Delhi High Court dismissed AISA chief Neha Bora’s plea challenging a ₹10,000 peace bond notice issued after her detention during an anti-CEC protest at Mandi House on October 16.

Delhi High Court rejects AISA chief Neha Bora’s plea against peace bond notice

AISA president Neha Bora was allegedly attacked with ink during the student protest march in Ranchi on Friday. Police detained a man accused of throwing ink at Bora as protesters marched towards the Jharkhand Assembly.&nbsp;The protest focused on alleged paper leaks and irregularities in the 14th Jharkhand Public Service Commission (JPSC) Civil Services Examination and the Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission Combined Graduate Level (JSSC-CGL) examination.&nbsp;Bora later posted a photograph showing ink covering her face and clothes. She alleged that "RSS-BJP goons" targeted her and around 20 other women during the demonstration.&nbsp;"For them ink is a tool to try to shame others, we will write the future with ink!" she wrote on social media. "I wear this ink with pride."&nbsp;"Today we were taking out a march from Birsa Munda Stadium. When I was standing there along with other colleagues, a man identified as Amarnath Pandey (26), who is also an RSS member, threw ink on me. To justify his criminal act, he did the same thing which people affiliated with the RSS do - chanted Jai Shri Ram. People at the protest caught him and handed him over to the police," she said, speaking to reporters.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><a href="https://x.com/hashtag/WATCH?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WATCH</a> | Ranchi, Jharkhand | President of the All India Students Association, Neha Bora says, &quot;...Today we were taking out a march from Birsa Munda Stadium. When I was standing there along with other colleagues, a man identified as Amarnath Pandey (26) who is also an RSS member,… <a href="https://t.co/sKe41phDAz">pic.twitter.com/sKe41phDAz</a>&mdash; ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://x.com/ANI/status/2085674983762886766?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Footage from the protest showed black ink across Bora's face, neck and clothes. She also told reporters that the accused allegedly shouted "Jai Shri Ram" before protesters overpowered him and handed him to the police.&nbsp;The Ranchi protest came after Bora became a prominent face of the wider student movement against alleged irregularities in government recruitment examinations. Last month, she staged a 23-day hunger strike at Delhi's Jantar Mantar during the student agitation. The protests later led to the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan.<h2>Bora demands transparency in recruitment exams</h2>Following the incident, Bora reiterated the students' demand for greater accountability in government recruitment examinations. She called for all such exams to follow a transparent and fair process.Bora also said the government should accept responsibility for paper leaks rather than blaming private agencies for irregularities.&nbsp;"We demand that all private agencies involved in the system and facing allegations of irregularities and corruption must be removed. We will support the call given by students on the 10th and continue to stand for the future of students," she said.

AISA chief Neha Bora alleged that she and other women protesters were targeted with ink in Ranchi as students continued their agitation over alleged JPSC and JSSC-CGL examination irregularities.

AISA president Neha Bora was allegedly attacked with ink during the student protest march in Ranchi on Friday. Police detained a man accused of throwing ink at Bora as protesters marched towards the Jharkhand Assembly. The protest focused on alleged paper leaks and irregularities in the 14th Jharkhand Public Service Commission (JPSC) Civil Services Examination and the Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission Combined Graduate Level (JSSC-CGL) examination. Bora later posted a photograph showing ink covering her face and clothes. She alleged that "RSS-BJP goons" targeted her and around 20 other women during the demonstration. "For them ink is a tool to try to shame others, we will write the future with ink!" she wrote on social media. "I wear this ink with pride." "Today we were taking out a march from Birsa Munda Stadium. When I was standing there along with other colleagues, a man identified as Amarnath Pandey (26), who is also an RSS member, threw ink on me. To justify his criminal act, he did the same thing which people affiliated with the RSS do - chanted Jai Shri Ram. People at the protest caught him and handed him over to the police," she said, speaking to reporters.

AISA chief Neha Bora alleged that she and other women protesters were targeted with ink in Ranchi as students continued their agitation over alleged JPSC and JSSC-CGL examination irregularities.

‘We will write the future with ink’: AISA’s Neha Bora after Jharkhand protest ink attack

aisa-president-neha-bora

Aisa President Neha Bora, News on Aisa President Neha Bora, stories on Aisa President Neha Bora, articles on Aisa President Neha Bora, Aisa President Neha Bora stories at Wion, Aisa President Neha Bora news, Aisa President Neha Bora latest news

aisa president-neha-bora

Delhi High Court rejects AISA chief Neha Bora’s plea against peace bond notice

‘We will write the future with ink’: AISA’s Neha Bora after Jharkhand ink attack