Brazil Supreme Court ruling could free corruption convicts, including Lula da Silva

Brazil'sSupremeCourtbegan debating on Thursday whether to overturn a three-year-old rule that convicted criminals must go to prison right after losing their first appeal and not wait until they have exhausted their appeal options.

The rule contributed to the success ofBrazil's biggestcorruptioninvestigation, the so-called Car Wash operation that put dozens of company executives and politicians in jail for bribes and kickbacks,includingformer leftist President Luiz InacioLulada Silva.

The prospect of serving immediate prison time after losing a first appeal encouraged suspects to negotiate plea deals with prosecutors, providing them with information that helped unravel the biggest graft scheme inBrazil's history.

Add WION as a Preferred Source

Lulaand many others convicted ofcorruptionin the Car Wash investigationcouldbe released from prison if the topcourtreverses the rule, as expected when the justices vote on October 24.

Justice Marco Aurelio de Mello, the second-longest-serving justice on the 11-membercourt, told Reuters on Wednesday he would vote for a return to the original rule that all appeals must be exhausted before a convicted defendant goes to prison.

Mello rejected criticism that the debate was geared to benefitLula, who went to jail in July 2018 for 8 years and 10 months for receiving bribes from engineering companies in return for government contracts.

Mello told reporters at thecourton Thursday that he expects a 7-4 decision in favour of allowing defendants the right to a full appeals process before they are imprisoned.

Former judge Sergio Moro, who handled most of the Car Wash trials and is now justice minister in the government of right-wing President Jair Bolsonaro, said such a decision would be a big setback forBrazil's fight againstcorruption.

In Thursday's session, lawyers for political parties opposed to the rule and theBrazilian Bar Association argued that it violated the constitution, which establishes the presumption of innocence of a defendant throughout the appeals process.

"Whether we like it or not, whether we disagree with the Constitution or find it out of date, the fact is that this is what the Constitution says," said Jose Eduardo Cardozo, a former justice minister.

The top public prosecutor and the government's solicitor general, who have both defended the current rule, will have the closing arguments before the justices cast their votes.

According to the National Council of Justice, some 4,895convictscouldpotentially benefit from the rule change.