Watch top headlines of the hour: - Hush money case: Trump found guilty - Donald Trump: Trial was rigged - Hush money verdict: Trump to hold press conference on Friday - Yemen: US & UK airstrikes target multiple sites - Biden allows limited use of US arms inside Russia - Sexual abuse case: Indian MP Prajwal Revanna arrested - India: IMD forecasts heatwave conditions in 10 states

India: Heatwave in 10 states | Biden allows limited use of US arms in Russia

Donald Trump became the first former US president ever convicted of a crime after a New York jury found him guilty on all charges in his hush money case. Watch in for more details!

Trump found guilty in Hush Money case, says Biden is destroying our country

A New York jury on Thursday (May 30) found former United States President Donald Trump guilty on all charges in his hush money case, months before an election that could see him yet return to the White House.

Trump Hush Money Trial: Donald Trump announces conference on Friday at Trump tower

Two main candidates of the US Presidential election Joe Biden and Donald Trump both say that America needs a strong military. Watch in the ongoing clash between both leaders!

Biden, Trump clash on US military

Trump Hush Money trial: A timeline

After becoming the first U.S. president to be convicted of a crime on Thursday (May 30), Donald Trump left the courthouse in a motorcade and arrived at Trump Tower. A New York jury found him guilty of falsifying documents to cover up a payment to silence a porn star ahead of the 2016 election.

Trump's Hush money case: 'The real verdict is going to be on Nov 5': Donald Trump

Trump's Hush money case: Trump calls verdict 'rigged,' blames Biden for conviction

A New York jury found Donald Trump guilty of all charges in his hush-money case, making him the first former US president to be convicted of a crime. This verdict comes months before an election that could see Trump win the presidency again. Watch to know more.

Trump hush money case: Former U.S. President found guilty on all 34 charges

Trump's Hush Money Case: DonaldTrump guilty on all counts in Hush-Money case | WION

Former US President Donald Trump's criminal trial over alleged falsified documents to cover up a "hush money" payment is coming to a close. Watch in for more details!

Donald Trump's Hush Money Trial: Grounds for appeal?

Donald Trump is accused by the Manhattan District Attorney’s office of 34 state felony criminal charges of falsifying business records, specifically about 11 invoices, 12 vouchers, and 11 checks. Watch to know more.

Hush Money Trial: Jurors begin deliberation

At the Manhattan courthouse, lawyers for former US President Donald Trump and state prosecutors presented their closing arguments to jurors in the hush money trial on Tuesday (May 28).&nbsp;Now, the jury will soon deliberate whether Trump will become the first former US president convicted of a crime as he faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to a $130,000 payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels.

Here are the key takeaways from the closing arguments of the defence and prosecution&nbsp;

<h2>Defence closing arguments</h2>

Trump’s defence lawyer Todd Blanche delivered nearly three hours of arguments and challenged the prosecution's case by attacking the credibility of its star witness, Michael Cohen. Blanche's argument ranged from detailed discussions on tax filings to political campaign practices.&nbsp;

“There’s no malfeasance here, only democracy in action,” Blanche said, adding the case was a 'witch hunt'.&nbsp;

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-denies-attack-in-rafah-evacuation-area-that-killed-21-us-says-no-change-in-policy-726465">Israel denies attack in Rafah evacuation area that killed 21, US says no change in policy</a>

By framing his case as a misinterpretation of normal campaign activities, he argued that every political campaign in the country "is a conspiracy to promote a candidate, a group of people who are working together to help somebody win.”

In addition to this, Blanche dismissed Daniels’s testimony as irrelevant to the charges and accused her of attempting to garner sympathy from jurors.

He also depicted Cohen as a “serial liar” and “the human embodiment of reasonable doubt.”&nbsp;

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-military-temporarily-removes-gaza-aid-pier-for-repairs-following-structural-damage-726464">US military temporarily removes Gaza aid pier for repairs following structural damage</a>

Urging jurors to remain impartial, Blanche concluded, “This is not a referendum on the ballot box—who you voted for in 2016 or 2020, who you plan on voting for in 2024. That is not what this is about.”

<h2>Prosecution closing arguments</h2>

Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass spent over five hours detailing the case against Trump, pointing out that the former president attempted to 'hoodwink voters'.&nbsp;

He characterised his actions as a deliberate conspiracy to deceive voters during the 2016 election. Steinglass argued that Trump orchestrated an elaborate scheme to conceal payments which involved a series of events aimed at manipulating and defrauding voters.

“Trump’s intent to defraud could not be any clearer,” Steinglass said.

Watch |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/gravitas-pope-francis-apologizes-after-homophobic-slur-726439">Gravitas: Pope Francis apologizes after homophobic slur</a>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/gravitas-pope-francis-apologizes-after-homophobic-slur-726439/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

He also pointed out that a direct payment to Daniels would have been simpler but less effective in hiding the affair.

He argued that the scheme was “cloaked in lies" and it benefitted Trump above all others.

“The name of the game was concealment and all roads lead inescapably to the man who benefited the most: the defendant, former president Donald Trump.”

Addressing the jury, Steinglass invoked Trump’s own words, saying, “Donald Trump can’t shoot someone on Fifth Avenue at rush hour and get away with it.” However, this remark by the prosecution drew an objection from Blanche.&nbsp;

Steinglass also reviewed other “catch-and-kill” schemes linked to Trump, including that by National Enquirer&nbsp;publisher David Pecker.&nbsp;

Countering the defence’s portrayal of the hush money as a move to protect Trump’s family, Steinglass noted the timing of the payment in 2016, 10 years after the alleged affair.

“The defendant’s primary concern was not his family but the election,” he said.

Oscar winner actor Robert De Niro, 80, was also present on behalf of the Biden campaign outside the courthouse. De Niro, calling Trump "a clown," expressed his connection to downtown New York City and said the former US president does not belong there. This marked the Biden campaign's first clear involvement in Trump's legal issues.

Protesters shouted slogans against De Niro, calling him a "paid sell-out" to the Democratic National Committee. De Niro was joined along side former police officers who defended the US Capitol on January&nbsp;6, 2021.&nbsp;

Starting Wednesday (May 29), the jury will begin evaluating the 34 counts of falsifying business records.

A verdict in&nbsp;the case may not be reached by the end of the week, reports said, but the 12-member jury is on the brink of making a historic decision.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

At the Manhattan courthouse, lawyers for former US President Donald Trump and state prosecutors presented their closing arguments to jurors in the hush money trial on Tuesday (May 28).

At the Manhattan courthouse, lawyers for former US President Donald Trump and state prosecutors presented their closing arguments to jurors in the hush money trial on Tuesday (May 28). Now, the jury will soon deliberate whether Trump will become the first former US president convicted of a crime as he faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to a $130,000 payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels. Here are the key takeaways from the closing arguments of the defence and prosecution Defence closing arguments Trump’s defence lawyer Todd Blanche delivered nearly three hours of arguments and challenged the prosecution's case by attacking the credibility of its star witness, Michael Cohen. Blanche's argument ranged from detailed discussions on tax filings to political campaign practices. “There’s no malfeasance here, only democracy in action,” Blanche said, adding the case was a 'witch hunt'. Also Read | Israel denies attack in Rafah evacuation area that killed 21, US says no change in policy By framing his case as a misinterpretation of normal campaign activities, he argued that every political campaign in the country "is a conspiracy to promote a candidate, a group of people who are working together to help somebody win.” In addition to this, Blanche dismissed Daniels’s testimony as irrelevant to the charges and accused her of attempting to garner sympathy from jurors. He also depicted Cohen as a “serial liar” and “the human embodiment of reasonable doubt.” Also Read | US military temporarily removes Gaza aid pier for repairs following structural damage Urging jurors to remain impartial, Blanche concluded, “This is not a referendum on the ballot box—who you voted for in 2016 or 2020, who you plan on voting for in 2024. That is not what this is about.” Prosecution closing arguments Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass spent over five hours detailing the case against Trump, pointing out that the former president attempted to 'hoodwink voters'. He characterised his actions as a deliberate conspiracy to deceive voters during the 2016 election. Steinglass argued that Trump orchestrated an elaborate scheme to conceal payments which involved a series of events aimed at manipulating and defrauding voters. “Trump’s intent to defraud could not be any clearer,” Steinglass said. Watch | Gravitas: Pope Francis apologizes after homophobic slur × He also pointed out that a direct payment to Daniels would have been simpler but less effective in hiding the affair. He argued that the scheme was “cloaked in lies" and it benefitted Trump above all others. “The name of the game was concealment and all roads lead inescapably to the man who benefited the most: the defendant, former president Donald Trump.” Addressing the jury, Steinglass invoked Trump’s own words, saying, “Donald Trump can’t shoot someone on Fifth Avenue at rush hour and get away with it.” However, this remark by the prosecution drew an objection from Blanche. Steinglass also reviewed other “catch-and-kill” schemes linked to Trump, including that by National Enquirer publisher David Pecker. Countering the defence’s portrayal of the hush money as a move to protect Trump’s family, Steinglass noted the timing of the payment in 2016, 10 years after the alleged affair. “The defendant’s primary concern was not his family but the election,” he said. Oscar winner actor Robert De Niro, 80, was also present on behalf of the Biden campaign outside the courthouse. De Niro, calling Trump "a clown," expressed his connection to downtown New York City and said the former US president does not belong there. This marked the Biden campaign's first clear involvement in Trump's legal issues. Protesters shouted slogans against De Niro, calling him a "paid sell-out" to the Democratic National Committee. De Niro was joined along side former police officers who defended the US Capitol on January 6, 2021. Starting Wednesday (May 29), the jury will begin evaluating the 34 counts of falsifying business records. A verdict in the case may not be reached by the end of the week, reports said, but the 12-member jury is on the brink of making a historic decision. (With inputs from agencies)

Trump hush money trial day 21: Robert DeNiro heckled by Trump supporters on closing arguments day

Special Counsel Jack Smith, in the ongoing legal saga surrounding Donald Trump's handling of classified documents, sought a gag order against the former US President&nbsp;after his brazen&nbsp;claims regarding FBI actions during a search at his Mar-a-Lago resort.

The request made by prosecutors from the special counsel's office comes in response to Trump's repeated and unfounded criticisms of the FBI's protocol during the search operation conducted in August 2022.&nbsp;

Trump had claimed that he "nearly escaped death. Biden’s DOJ was locked and loaded for deadly force at Mar-a-Lago …” “They were authorized to shoot me!"&nbsp;

Trump's&nbsp;allegation&nbsp;that FBI agents were prepared to use deadly force against him and his family during the search were debunked by FBI&nbsp;Attorney General Merrick Garland.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/uvalde-school-shooting-families-of-victims-sue-instagram-and-call-of-duty-725179">Uvalde school shooting: Families of victims sue Instagram and Call of Duty&nbsp;</a>

“That allegation is false, and it is extremely dangerous. The document that is being referred to in the allegation is the Justice Department’s standard policy, limiting the use of force,” Garland said.

Prosecutors argued that Trump's inflammatory remarks pose a threat to the integrity of the ongoing criminal case and the safety of law enforcement officers involved.

“The Government’s request is necessary because of several intentionally false and inflammatory statements recently made by Trump that distort the circumstances under which the Federal Bureau of Investigation planned and executed the search warrant at Mar-a-Lago,” prosecutors&nbsp;wrote.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/papua-new-guinea-landslide-four-killed-over-300-buried-as-rescue-teams-rush-to-save-trapped-villagers-725167">Papua New Guinea landslide: Four killed, over 300 buried as rescue teams rush to save trapped villagers</a>

“Those statements create a grossly misleading impression about the intentions and conduct of federal law enforcement agents—falsely suggesting that they were complicit in a plot to assassinate him—and expose those agents, some of whom will be witnesses at trial, to the risk of threats, violence, and harassment," they added.&nbsp;

<h2>'Repeated mischaracterisation as an attempt to kill him'</h2>

The filing revealed that Trump has continued to amplify his accusations against the FBI via his Truth Social account, despite official clarifications and the release of paperwork detailing standard FBI search protocols.

Watch |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/how-gun-politics-could-affect-us-polls-725168">How gun politics could affect US polls?</a>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/how-gun-politics-could-affect-us-polls-725168/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

“Trump‘s repeated mischaracterisation as an attempt to kill him, his family, and Secret Service agents has endangered law enforcement officers involved in the investigation and prosecution of this case and threatened the integrity of these proceedings,” prosecutors wrote.

Gag orders restricting Trump's public commentary have been upheld in other legal proceedings, including his New York trial and the election interference case in Washington, DC, due to concerns about threats and harassment stemming from his remarks.

(With inputs from agencies)

Special Counsel Jack Smith, in the ongoing legal saga surrounding Donald Trump's handling of classified documents, sought a gag order against the former US President after his brazen claims regarding FBI actions during a search at his Mar-a-Lago resort.

Special Counsel Jack Smith, in the ongoing legal saga surrounding Donald Trump's handling of classified documents, sought a gag order against the former US President after his brazen claims regarding FBI actions during a search at his Mar-a-Lago resort. The request made by prosecutors from the special counsel's office comes in response to Trump's repeated and unfounded criticisms of the FBI's protocol during the search operation conducted in August 2022. Trump had claimed that he "nearly escaped death. Biden’s DOJ was locked and loaded for deadly force at Mar-a-Lago …” “They were authorized to shoot me!" Trump's allegation that FBI agents were prepared to use deadly force against him and his family during the search were debunked by FBI Attorney General Merrick Garland. Also Read | Uvalde school shooting: Families of victims sue Instagram and Call of Duty “That allegation is false, and it is extremely dangerous. The document that is being referred to in the allegation is the Justice Department’s standard policy, limiting the use of force,” Garland said. Prosecutors argued that Trump's inflammatory remarks pose a threat to the integrity of the ongoing criminal case and the safety of law enforcement officers involved. “The Government’s request is necessary because of several intentionally false and inflammatory statements recently made by Trump that distort the circumstances under which the Federal Bureau of Investigation planned and executed the search warrant at Mar-a-Lago,” prosecutors wrote. Also Read | Papua New Guinea landslide: Four killed, over 300 buried as rescue teams rush to save trapped villagers “Those statements create a grossly misleading impression about the intentions and conduct of federal law enforcement agents—falsely suggesting that they were complicit in a plot to assassinate him—and expose those agents, some of whom will be witnesses at trial, to the risk of threats, violence, and harassment," they added. 'Repeated mischaracterisation as an attempt to kill him' The filing revealed that Trump has continued to amplify his accusations against the FBI via his Truth Social account, despite official clarifications and the release of paperwork detailing standard FBI search protocols. Watch | How gun politics could affect US polls? × “Trump‘s repeated mischaracterisation as an attempt to kill him, his family, and Secret Service agents has endangered law enforcement officers involved in the investigation and prosecution of this case and threatened the integrity of these proceedings,” prosecutors wrote. Gag orders restricting Trump's public commentary have been upheld in other legal proceedings, including his New York trial and the election interference case in Washington, DC, due to concerns about threats and harassment stemming from his remarks. (With inputs from agencies)

US: Special Counsel seeks gag order on Trump who claims FBI agents were 'authorised to shoot me'

Former Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley has said she plans to vote for Donald Trump, her former opponent and boss, in the 2024 US presidential election.

US: Haley looking to mend relations with Trump?

Former US President Donald Trump's lawyers on Monday pressed the judge overseeing his Hush Money Trial to stop the case from going to the jury and throw out the charges after prosecutors concluded their presentation of evidence. Watch in for more details!

Hush Money Trial: Trump's hush money trial near its end

The abortion debate is back in the United States former president Donald Trump seems to have walked back on his earlier remark he now says that he doesn't advocate restrictions on contraception.

US elections: Debate over reproductive rights continues to polarise US

Former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, alongside 10 other allies of Donald Trump, pleaded not guilty on Tuesday (May 21) in an Arizona case accusing them of attempting to keep the former US president in power after his 2020 election loss.

The arraignment took place in downtown Phoenix and was brought forth by Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes.

Giuliani, attending virtually, was ordered to appear in person within 30 days and post a $10,000 appearance bond, a requirement not imposed on the other defendants.

Prosecutors highlighted Giuliani's efforts to evade indictment notice as the reason for this special condition.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-urges-civilised-nations-to-spurn-arrest-warrants-by-icc-for-its-leaders-724058">Israel urges 'civilised nations' to spurn arrest warrants by ICC for its leaders</a>

“Rudy Giuliani has made numerous statements over the past month discussing the indictment, his co-defendants and, quite frankly, mocking the justice system in Arizona,” said state prosecutor Nicholas Klingerman.

<h2>'Complete embarrassment to the American legal system'</h2>

During the hearing, Giuliani called the indictment “a complete embarrassment to the American legal system”.

He was one of three defendants without legal representation as the former Trump lawyer has been facing financial struggles and filed for bankruptcy in December last year.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/putin-and-xi-to-meet-again-in-july-after-russian-presidents-recent-visit-to-china-724060">Putin and Xi to meet again in July after Russian president’s recent visit to China</a>

This case is part of a broader effort that has seen 50 people, including Trump, charged with election interference across four states -&nbsp;Arizona, Nevada, Michigan and&nbsp;Georgia.&nbsp;

Trump remains uncharged in Arizona but is listed as "Unindicted Co-conspirator 1."

Other defendants present during the Tuesday hearing included key figure in Trump's 2020 campaign Christina Bobb and former head of the Arizona Republican Party Kelli Ward.

The defendants face charges of conspiracy, fraud and forgery, and have pleaded not guilty, reports said.&nbsp;

Giuliani faced additional scrutiny for ignoring the indictment. After being elusive, he was finally served notice.

Klingerman noted, “My agents attempted to serve the summons at Mr. Giuliani’s Manhattan apartment but were refused entry.”

Watch |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/why-did-us-impose-sanctions-on-the-former-bangalesdhi-general-724052">Why did US impose sanctions on the former Bangalesdhi General?</a>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/why-did-us-impose-sanctions-on-the-former-bangalesdhi-general-724052/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

In court, Giuliani explained, “The reason for the difficulty to get up to my apartment in New York is it’s a 10-story apartment, I have a fair number of threats, including death threats, and I don’t have security any longer since I’ve been in bankruptcy.”

Prosecutors requested a $10,000 cash bond for Giuliani, but the court settled on an appearance bond. Giuliani contested this, calling the case “completely political.”

The stance of defence, Kelli Ward and her husband Michael, largely rests on constitutional rights.&nbsp;

Brad Miller, a lawyer for both, reportedly said outside court, “What they’re attempting to do is exercise their constitutional right for peaceable protest, their constitutional right for redress of grievances of their own government.”

(With inputs from agencies)

Former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, alongside 10 other allies of Donald Trump, pleaded not guilty on Tuesday (May 21) in an Arizona case accusing them of attempting to keep the former US president in power after his 2020 election loss.

Former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, alongside 10 other allies of Donald Trump, pleaded not guilty on Tuesday (May 21) in an Arizona case accusing them of attempting to keep the former US president in power after his 2020 election loss. The arraignment took place in downtown Phoenix and was brought forth by Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes. Giuliani, attending virtually, was ordered to appear in person within 30 days and post a $10,000 appearance bond, a requirement not imposed on the other defendants. Prosecutors highlighted Giuliani's efforts to evade indictment notice as the reason for this special condition. Also Read | Israel urges 'civilised nations' to spurn arrest warrants by ICC for its leaders “Rudy Giuliani has made numerous statements over the past month discussing the indictment, his co-defendants and, quite frankly, mocking the justice system in Arizona,” said state prosecutor Nicholas Klingerman. 'Complete embarrassment to the American legal system' During the hearing, Giuliani called the indictment “a complete embarrassment to the American legal system”. He was one of three defendants without legal representation as the former Trump lawyer has been facing financial struggles and filed for bankruptcy in December last year. Also Read | Putin and Xi to meet again in July after Russian president’s recent visit to China This case is part of a broader effort that has seen 50 people, including Trump, charged with election interference across four states - Arizona, Nevada, Michigan and Georgia. Trump remains uncharged in Arizona but is listed as "Unindicted Co-conspirator 1." Other defendants present during the Tuesday hearing included key figure in Trump's 2020 campaign Christina Bobb and former head of the Arizona Republican Party Kelli Ward. The defendants face charges of conspiracy, fraud and forgery, and have pleaded not guilty, reports said. Giuliani faced additional scrutiny for ignoring the indictment. After being elusive, he was finally served notice. Klingerman noted, “My agents attempted to serve the summons at Mr. Giuliani’s Manhattan apartment but were refused entry.” Watch | Why did US impose sanctions on the former Bangalesdhi General? × In court, Giuliani explained, “The reason for the difficulty to get up to my apartment in New York is it’s a 10-story apartment, I have a fair number of threats, including death threats, and I don’t have security any longer since I’ve been in bankruptcy.” Prosecutors requested a $10,000 cash bond for Giuliani, but the court settled on an appearance bond. Giuliani contested this, calling the case “completely political.” The stance of defence, Kelli Ward and her husband Michael, largely rests on constitutional rights. Brad Miller, a lawyer for both, reportedly said outside court, “What they’re attempting to do is exercise their constitutional right for peaceable protest, their constitutional right for redress of grievances of their own government.” (With inputs from agencies)

Arizona election interference case: Giuliani, Trump allies plead not guilty

New court documents released on Tuesday (May 20) revealed&nbsp;that, months before Donald Trump's indictment for mishandling classified documents, a federal judge found 'strong evidence' that the former US president&nbsp;'intended' to hide these documents&nbsp;in Mar-a-Lago, Florida.&nbsp;

Trump's attempt to have his classified documents case dismissed under the Presidential Records Act failed in&nbsp;April, and the case is currently&nbsp;in Fort Pierce, Florida.&nbsp;

The new court documents showed that Judge Beryl Howell also cited additional classified documents found at Mar-a-Lago, including a “mostly empty” folder marked “Classified Evening Summary” found in Trump’s bedroom.&nbsp;

“Notably, no excuse is provided as to how the former president could miss the classified-marked documents found in his own bedroom at Mar-a-Lago,” Howell reportedly wrote in March 2023.

The previously unsealed documents also showed that US President Joe Biden's administration authorised the use of 'deadly force' during the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida in August 2022.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/arizona-election-interference-case-giuliani-trump-allies-plead-not-guilty-724065">Arizona election interference case: Giuliani, Trump allies plead not guilty</a>

Reacting to these details, Trump took to Truth Social and wrote, “WOW! I just came out of the Biden Witch Hunt Trial in Manhattan, the ‘Icebox,’ and was shown Reports that Crooked Joe Biden’s DOJ, in their Illegal and UnConstitutional Raid of Mar-a-Lago, AUTHORIZED THE FBI TO USE DEADLY (LETHAL) FORCE. NOW WE KNOW, FOR SURE, THAT JOE BIDEN IS A SERIOUS THREAT TO DEMOCRACY.” He also added, “HE IS MENTALLY UNFIT TO HOLD OFFICE — 25TH AMENDMENT! [sic]”

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-deletes-unified-reich-post-after-backlash-biden-slams-former-prez-for-using-hitlers-language-724062">Trump deletes ‘unified Reich’ post after backlash; Biden slams former prez for using ‘Hitler’s language’</a>

The documents have brought to light intense legal battles between federal prosecutors and Trump’s lawyers over allegations of misconduct and politicisation in the handling of the investigation.

<h2>Trump’s attorney Evan Corcoran</h2>

Howell, in her 87-page opinion, wrote that she allowed&nbsp;special counsel Jack Smith to question Trump’s attorney, Evan Corcoran, about matters typically protected by attorney-client privilege and prosecutors showed that Trump knew Corcoran had falsely informed the government that all classified materials had been returned in June 2022.

Watch |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/gravitas-japanese-researchers-closer-to-make-biological-clock-irrelevant-724054">Gravitas: Japanese researchers closer to make biological clock irrelevant</a>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/gravitas-japanese-researchers-closer-to-make-biological-clock-irrelevant-724054/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

The court filings also included images of Trump’s personal aide, Walt Nauta, moving boxes at Mar-a-Lago before a Trump attorney was set to review them. Prosecutors alleged that Nauta moved these boxes as part of a conspiracy to hide classified material from federal investigators.

Nauta, Trump, and Mar-a-Lago property manager Carlos De Oliveira face charges of mishandling sensitive or classified materials and obstruction, with all three pleading not guilty. The case, which Judge Aileen Cannon is overseeing, involves multiple felony charges against Trump.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

New court documents released on Tuesday (May 20) revealed that, months before Donald Trump's indictment for mishandling classified documents, a federal judge found 'strong evidence' that the former US president 'intended' to hide these documents in Mar-a-Lago, Florida.

New court documents released on Tuesday (May 20) revealed that, months before Donald Trump's indictment for mishandling classified documents, a federal judge found 'strong evidence' that the former US president 'intended' to hide these documents in Mar-a-Lago, Florida. Trump's attempt to have his classified documents case dismissed under the Presidential Records Act failed in April, and the case is currently in Fort Pierce, Florida. The new court documents showed that Judge Beryl Howell also cited additional classified documents found at Mar-a-Lago, including a “mostly empty” folder marked “Classified Evening Summary” found in Trump’s bedroom. “Notably, no excuse is provided as to how the former president could miss the classified-marked documents found in his own bedroom at Mar-a-Lago,” Howell reportedly wrote in March 2023. The previously unsealed documents also showed that US President Joe Biden's administration authorised the use of 'deadly force' during the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida in August 2022. Also Read | Arizona election interference case: Giuliani, Trump allies plead not guilty Reacting to these details, Trump took to Truth Social and wrote, “WOW! I just came out of the Biden Witch Hunt Trial in Manhattan, the ‘Icebox,’ and was shown Reports that Crooked Joe Biden’s DOJ, in their Illegal and UnConstitutional Raid of Mar-a-Lago, AUTHORIZED THE FBI TO USE DEADLY (LETHAL) FORCE. NOW WE KNOW, FOR SURE, THAT JOE BIDEN IS A SERIOUS THREAT TO DEMOCRACY.” He also added, “HE IS MENTALLY UNFIT TO HOLD OFFICE — 25TH AMENDMENT! [sic]” Also Read | Trump deletes ‘unified Reich’ post after backlash; Biden slams former prez for using ‘Hitler’s language’ The documents have brought to light intense legal battles between federal prosecutors and Trump’s lawyers over allegations of misconduct and politicisation in the handling of the investigation. Trump’s attorney Evan Corcoran Howell, in her 87-page opinion, wrote that she allowed special counsel Jack Smith to question Trump’s attorney, Evan Corcoran, about matters typically protected by attorney-client privilege and prosecutors showed that Trump knew Corcoran had falsely informed the government that all classified materials had been returned in June 2022. Watch | Gravitas: Japanese researchers closer to make biological clock irrelevant × The court filings also included images of Trump’s personal aide, Walt Nauta, moving boxes at Mar-a-Lago before a Trump attorney was set to review them. Prosecutors alleged that Nauta moved these boxes as part of a conspiracy to hide classified material from federal investigators. Nauta, Trump, and Mar-a-Lago property manager Carlos De Oliveira face charges of mishandling sensitive or classified materials and obstruction, with all three pleading not guilty. The case, which Judge Aileen Cannon is overseeing, involves multiple felony charges against Trump. (With inputs from agencies)

Months before indictment, Judge found 'strong evidence' that Trump's 'intended' to hide classified documents

Trump's Hush Money Trial: Donald Trump's hush money trial near its end

Hush money trial might be taking up much of Donald Trump's time but that has not slowed down his supporters and backers from pouring money into his presidential campaign since 2024. Presidential race officially began it is for the first time Donald Trump has outraised his political rival Joe Biden for the month.

US elections 2024: The battle of campaign funds

On Day 19 of Donald Trump’s hush money trial, the prosecution concluded its case, presenting over 200 pieces of evidence and testimony from 20 witnesses. The defence began its rebuttal, which was marked by dramatic courtroom moments and heated exchanges.

Here are the key takeaways from Day 19 of Trump's hush money trail:&nbsp;

<h2>- Prosecution rests case</h2>

The prosecution wrapped up after days of extensive testimonies from Michael Cohen, Stormy Daniels, former Trump aide Hope Hicks, and ex-National Enquirer publisher David Pecker. Michael Cohen repeated his allegations that Trump directed him to pay Daniels and approved the reimbursement plan central to the charges.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/amal-clooney-helps-icc-seek-arrest-warrants-for-israeli-hamas-leaders-723687">Amal Clooney helps ICC seek arrest warrants for Israeli, Hamas leaders</a>

Trump's attorney Todd Blanche, during cross-examination,&nbsp;attempted to discredit Cohen’s reliability. Prosecutors bolstered their case with documents and expert testimonies to corroborate Cohen's claims.

<h2>- Defence witness infuriates judge</h2>

Defence witness Robert Costello faced Judge Juan Merchan's ire for repeatedly violating courtroom decorum. Merchan rebuked Costello for his audible complaints and disrespectful behaviour, even clearing the courtroom of the press momentarily. "When there’s a witness on the stand, if you don’t like my ruling, you don’t say ‘jeez,’” Judge Merchan told Costello. “You don’t give me a side eye and you don’t roll your eyes.”

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-anti-government-protesters-arrested-after-clashing-with-police-on-day-of-disruption-723686">Israel: Several anti-government protesters arrested after clashing with police on ‘day of disruption’</a>

Merchan said, “I’m putting you on notice that your conduct is contemptuous" and “if you try to stare me down one more time, I will remove you from the stand.” Costello will continue his testimony under cross-examination by prosecutor Susan Hoffinger.&nbsp;

<h2>- Trump's defence, Cohen's theft</h2>

The defence, having started its case with Costello and a paralegal, seems poised to rest on Tuesday (May 21).&nbsp;Judge Merchan scheduled closing arguments for next Tuesday (May 28).&nbsp;

Earlier, in an admission of theft, Cohen under cross-examination said he stole $60,000 from the Trump Organization, citing frustration over an unpaid bonus.

He also reaffirmed his testimony that Trump authorised the payment to Daniels.

<h2>- Prosecutors vs defence over Cohen’s call</h2>

Blanche had questioned Cohen's account of a phone call updating Trump on the Daniels payment by calling Trump’s former bodyguard&nbsp;Keith Schiller at&nbsp;8:02 pm on October 24, 2016.&nbsp;

Blanche said that it was actually about a harassing prank caller.

However, Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger&nbsp;countered with evidence, placing Trump and his bodyguard together at the time of the call at a&nbsp;Trump’s rally.&nbsp;

Cohen maintained he spoke with Trump about Daniels numerous times in October 2016, standing firm despite rigorous cross-examination.

Watch |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/gravitas-after-ebrahim-raisis-death-what-happens-next-in-iran-723668">Gravitas | After Ebrahim Raisi’s Death, What Happens Next in Iran?</a>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/gravitas-after-ebrahim-raisis-death-what-happens-next-in-iran-723668/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

With the trial nearing its conclusion, the case against Trump is about to be handed to the jury, who will deliberate based on the extensive testimonies and evidence presented over the past month.

(With inputs from agencies)

 
&nbsp;

On Day 19 of Donald Trump’s hush money trial, the prosecution concluded its case, presenting over 200 pieces of evidence and testimony from 20 witnesses. The defence began its rebuttal, which was marked by dramatic courtroom moments and heated exchanges.

On Day 19 of Donald Trump’s hush money trial, the prosecution concluded its case, presenting over 200 pieces of evidence and testimony from 20 witnesses. The defence began its rebuttal, which was marked by dramatic courtroom moments and heated exchanges. Here are the key takeaways from Day 19 of Trump's hush money trail: - Prosecution rests case The prosecution wrapped up after days of extensive testimonies from Michael Cohen, Stormy Daniels, former Trump aide Hope Hicks, and ex-National Enquirer publisher David Pecker. Michael Cohen repeated his allegations that Trump directed him to pay Daniels and approved the reimbursement plan central to the charges. Also Read | Amal Clooney helps ICC seek arrest warrants for Israeli, Hamas leaders Trump's attorney Todd Blanche, during cross-examination, attempted to discredit Cohen’s reliability. Prosecutors bolstered their case with documents and expert testimonies to corroborate Cohen's claims. - Defence witness infuriates judge Defence witness Robert Costello faced Judge Juan Merchan's ire for repeatedly violating courtroom decorum. Merchan rebuked Costello for his audible complaints and disrespectful behaviour, even clearing the courtroom of the press momentarily. "When there’s a witness on the stand, if you don’t like my ruling, you don’t say ‘jeez,’” Judge Merchan told Costello. “You don’t give me a side eye and you don’t roll your eyes.” Also Read | Israel: Several anti-government protesters arrested after clashing with police on ‘day of disruption’ Merchan said, “I’m putting you on notice that your conduct is contemptuous" and “if you try to stare me down one more time, I will remove you from the stand.” Costello will continue his testimony under cross-examination by prosecutor Susan Hoffinger. - Trump's defence, Cohen's theft The defence, having started its case with Costello and a paralegal, seems poised to rest on Tuesday (May 21). Judge Merchan scheduled closing arguments for next Tuesday (May 28). Earlier, in an admission of theft, Cohen under cross-examination said he stole $60,000 from the Trump Organization, citing frustration over an unpaid bonus. He also reaffirmed his testimony that Trump authorised the payment to Daniels. - Prosecutors vs defence over Cohen’s call Blanche had questioned Cohen's account of a phone call updating Trump on the Daniels payment by calling Trump’s former bodyguard Keith Schiller at 8:02 pm on October 24, 2016. Blanche said that it was actually about a harassing prank caller. However, Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger countered with evidence, placing Trump and his bodyguard together at the time of the call at a Trump’s rally. Cohen maintained he spoke with Trump about Daniels numerous times in October 2016, standing firm despite rigorous cross-examination. Watch | Gravitas | After Ebrahim Raisi’s Death, What Happens Next in Iran? × With the trial nearing its conclusion, the case against Trump is about to be handed to the jury, who will deliberate based on the extensive testimonies and evidence presented over the past month. (With inputs from agencies)

Trump hush money trial day 19: Defence witness in heated exchange; Cohen admits to stealing

The Trump campaign has come out strongly against The Apprentice, a film that shocked audiences at Cannes with its portrayal of former US president Donald Trump raping his first wife, Ivana Trump, among other things.&nbsp;

A spokesperson of the campaign confirmed that the Republican plans to sue "to address the blatantly false assertions from these pretend filmmakers."

<h2>'Pure fiction'</h2>

In a conversation with Variety following the film's premiere, Trump's chief spokesperson Steven Cheung on Monday (May 20) slammed the movie, directed by Ali Abbasi and starring Sebastian Stan as Trump.

Cheung called it "garbage" and "pure fiction," saying it sensationalises "lies that have been long debunked."

"As with the illegal Biden Trials, this is election interference by Hollywood elites, who know that President Trump will retake the White House and beat their candidate of choice because nothing they have done has worked," said Cheung.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/donald-trump-biopic-hits-cannes-film-festival-723596">Donald Trump biopic hits Cannes Film Festival</a>

Labelling the film "pure malicious defamation," he said it "should not see the light of day, and doesn't even deserve a place in the straight-to-DVD section of a bargain bin at a soon-to-be-closed discount movie store, it belongs in a dumpster fire."

The Apprentice received an eight-minute standing ovation at Cannes on Monday, reports The Guardian.&nbsp;

It includes scenes of Trump undergoing liposuction and scalp-reduction surgery.

However, the most controversial scene is where he rapes Ivana Trump.

Even though it opens with a disclaimer stating that the events are fictionalised, the movie has sparked intense reactions.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/south-korea-imposes-ban-on-viral-tiktok-song-which-idolises-norths-kim-jong-un-723819">South Korea imposes ban on viral TikTok song which idolises North's Kim Jong Un</a>

<h2>The alleged rape</h2>

The rape scene is a dramatised version of an incident disclosed in the couple's 1990 divorce proceedings.

Ivana Trump initially described the 1989 incident as a rape but later retracted, stating that while she felt violated, she didn't mean it in a criminal sense.

"On one occasion during 1989, Mr Trump and I had marital relations in which he behaved very differently towards me than he had during our marriage. As a woman I felt violated … I referred to this as a rape, but I do not want my words to be interpreted in a literal or criminal sense," she said in a 1993 statement.

(With inputs from agencies)

The Trump campaign has come out strongly against The Apprentice, a film that shocked audiences at Cannes with its portrayal of former US president Donald Trump raping his first wife, Ivana Trump, among other things.

The Trump campaign has come out strongly against The Apprentice, a film that shocked audiences at Cannes with its portrayal of former US president Donald Trump raping his first wife, Ivana Trump, among other things. A spokesperson of the campaign confirmed that the Republican plans to sue "to address the blatantly false assertions from these pretend filmmakers." 'Pure fiction' In a conversation with Variety following the film's premiere, Trump's chief spokesperson Steven Cheung on Monday (May 20) slammed the movie, directed by Ali Abbasi and starring Sebastian Stan as Trump. Cheung called it "garbage" and "pure fiction," saying it sensationalises "lies that have been long debunked." "As with the illegal Biden Trials, this is election interference by Hollywood elites, who know that President Trump will retake the White House and beat their candidate of choice because nothing they have done has worked," said Cheung. Also read | Donald Trump biopic hits Cannes Film Festival Labelling the film "pure malicious defamation," he said it "should not see the light of day, and doesn't even deserve a place in the straight-to-DVD section of a bargain bin at a soon-to-be-closed discount movie store, it belongs in a dumpster fire." The Apprentice received an eight-minute standing ovation at Cannes on Monday, reports The Guardian. It includes scenes of Trump undergoing liposuction and scalp-reduction surgery. However, the most controversial scene is where he rapes Ivana Trump. Even though it opens with a disclaimer stating that the events are fictionalised, the movie has sparked intense reactions. Also read | South Korea imposes ban on viral TikTok song which idolises North's Kim Jong Un The alleged rape The rape scene is a dramatised version of an incident disclosed in the couple's 1990 divorce proceedings. Ivana Trump initially described the 1989 incident as a rape but later retracted, stating that while she felt violated, she didn't mean it in a criminal sense. "On one occasion during 1989, Mr Trump and I had marital relations in which he behaved very differently towards me than he had during our marriage. As a woman I felt violated … I referred to this as a rape, but I do not want my words to be interpreted in a literal or criminal sense," she said in a 1993 statement. (With inputs from agencies)

Trump campaign slams Cannes film 'The Apprentice,' labels it 'pure fiction'

US presidential elections have focused in the past few months largely on two issues how the Biden Administration has handled the crisis in war in Gaza. Two the raging abortion debate in the US. Now Republican leader and presidential hopeful Donald Trump's speech has put another key issue under the spotlight America's gun laws.

US: Trump at National Rifles Association Forum

While the November presidential election will have major implications for U.S. foreign policy, it’s not a motivating issue for American voters. Protesters disrupted Google’s annual conference this week over the tech giant’s deal to provide artificial intelligence and other services to the Israeli government.

US foreign policy and November polls | Gaza protest: Google fires over 50

Former US President Donald Trump's defence team accused star prosecution witness Michael Cohen of lying on the stand regarding a phone call he had with Trump about Stormy Daniels.

Hush Money Trial: Trump's lawyer accuses Michael Cohen of 'lying'

Former US president Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner signed a 99-year lease deal with the Serbian authorities, allowing his company to recondition two buildings at the site of the former Yugoslav army headquarters in Belgrade that was bombed in US-led NATO strikes in 1999.

Former US president Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner signed a 99-year lease deal with the Serbian authorities, allowing his company to recondition two buildings at the site of the former Yugoslav army headquarters in Belgrade that was bombed in US-led NATO strikes in 1999. In a statement, the Serbian Construction Ministry said on Wednesday (May 15) that Kushner’s US-based investment firm Affinity Global Development “will invest in the revitalisation” of the former military complex. The building project, however, has caused widespread criticism in Serbia as the site is a painful symbol of the NATO bombing campaign. Also read: ‘Total moron’: Trump lambasts Biden, blames US president for his legal woes at rally in New Jersey "Everything ... will be in line with the Serbian laws, in cooperation with the government and relevant institutions ... that are responsible for urban planning and the protection of cultural heritage," the Serbian Construction Ministry’s statement said. In March, Kushner announced that a wider investment by his Affinity Partners in the Balkans would include projects in Albania and in Belgrade. Kushner's plan is to establish a luxury hotel, 1,500 residential units and a memorial centre dedicated to the victims of the bombing at the site of the headquarters buildings. Also read: US elections: Joe Biden, Donald Trump register wins in May 14 presidential primaries Kushner, married to Trump’s daughter Ivanka and a former top aide to Trump when he was president, set up the investment firm after stepping down from the job in 2021. The 1999 NATO bombing was launched to force the then strongman Slobodan Milosevic to end his brutal crackdown against Albanians, and put an end to the war in Kosovo. On his Instagram account, Kushner posted "early design images" of the project in March showing two luxurious glass towers where bombed-out buildings now stand. The ravaged site in central Belgrade was declared a protected "cultural asset" by the Serbian government in 2005. Over 22,000 people in Serbia have so far signed a petition calling for the buildings to be preserved. The buildings designed by Serbian architect Nikola Dobrovic were built between 1957 and 1965. (With inputs from agencies)

Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner signs lease deal with Serbia to overhaul army HQ bombed by NATO

United States President Biden and former President Trump committed to two Presidential debates, the first one in June, the second in September. President Biden's proposal came after weeks of pressure from Trump to agree to a debate. Watch in for more details!

US: Trump, Biden agree to two debates on June 27 and September 10

It seems like a deja vu moment for the American voters Joe Biden and Donald Trump has agreed to debate on the 27th of June on CNN the second debate will be on the 10th of September. This comes after Biden released a video saying he's ready to debate Donald Trump and his political rival has responded with a date.

US elections 2024: Joe Biden ready to debate Donald Trump

It seems like a Deja vu moment for the American voters, for the very first time, Joe Biden has said that he is ready to debate Donald Trump or as he puts it 'make my day pal!'.

US: Joe Biden says ready to debate with Donald Trump, 'make my dal pal!'

Watch top headlines of the hour: - US announces $2 bn new aid to Kyiv - Ukrainians angry over Blinken's jam session - Biden ready to debate Trump - Ireland to recognise Palestinian statehood - Two dead, riots sweep New Caledonia

Ireland to recognise Palestinian statehood | Biden ready to debate Trump

trump

Trump, News on Trump, stories on Trump, articles on Trump, Trump stories at Wion, Trump news, Trump latest news