The Balakot terror camp in Pakistan, which was targeted by the Indian Air Force in February last year. Has once again reopened to train terrorists and launch attacks, according to sources the camp operations this time will predominantly focus on anti-India activities.

Pakistan continues to be a safe haven for terrorists

<p>Former Air Force chief BS Dhanoa on Saturday said that there were plans to strike terror camps in Pakistan at least twice before the Balakot strikes.</p>

<p>Dhanoa said that the Air Force had proposed attacking the Pakistan-based terror camps after the 2001 Parliament attacks.</p>

<p>An Air Force strike was also proposed after the 26/11 Mumbai attacks in 2008, Dhanoa said.</p>

<p>"After the J-K Assembly attack in 2001, the IAF started planning how to strike terrorist camps if there was any large-scale terrorist attack in India. This proposal was put to the government twice," Dhanoa said.</p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WATCH?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WATCH</a> Former Air Force Chief Birender Singh Dhanoa speaks to ANI when asked about his earlier statement 'Government rejected Air Force plans to strike Pakistan after Parliament attack, 26/11' <a href="https://t.co/sJ8StLk95C">pic.twitter.com/sJ8StLk95C</a></p>
— ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1210845893999693824?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 28, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<p>"It was put to the government after the Parliament attack, and again when the government asked about it," he added.</p>

<p>Dhanoa said that the IAF had always been prepared to carry out a strike and that the central leadership had to take a call on the same.&nbsp;</p>

<p>"IAF has always been ready (to carry out a) strike and we have the strike capability. National leadership had to make a decision," he said.</p>

<p>"This time, national leadership took the decision and we carried out," he said.</p>

<p>Dhanoa was the air chief between December 31, 2016, and September 30, 2019. It was under his command that the Indian Air Force carried out strikes at Pakistan-based terror camps in Balakot, Pakistan after the ghastly Pulwama terror attack in February.</p>

<p><em>(With inputs from ANI)&nbsp;</em><br />
&nbsp;</p>


Former Air Force chief BS Dhanoa on Saturday said that there were plans to strike terror camps in Pakistan at least twice before the Balakot strikes. Dhanoa said that the Air Force had proposed attacking the Pakistan-based terror camps after the 2001 Parliament attacks.

Former Air Force chief BS Dhanoa on Saturday said that there were plans to strike terror camps in Pakistan at least twice before the Balakot strikes. Dhanoa said that the Air Force had proposed attacking the Pakistan-based terror camps after the 2001 Parliament attacks. An Air Force strike was also proposed after the 26/11 Mumbai attacks in 2008, Dhanoa said. "After the J-K Assembly attack in 2001, the IAF started planning how to strike terrorist camps if there was any large-scale terrorist attack in India. This proposal was put to the government twice," Dhanoa said. #WATCH Former Air Force Chief Birender Singh Dhanoa speaks to ANI when asked about his earlier statement 'Government rejected Air Force plans to strike Pakistan after Parliament attack, 26/11' pic.twitter.com/sJ8StLk95C — ANI (@ANI) December 28, 2019 × "It was put to the government after the Parliament attack, and again when the government asked about it," he added. Dhanoa said that the IAF had always been prepared to carry out a strike and that the central leadership had to take a call on the same. "IAF has always been ready (to carry out a) strike and we have the strike capability. National leadership had to make a decision," he said. "This time, national leadership took the decision and we carried out," he said. Dhanoa was the air chief between December 31, 2016, and September 30, 2019. It was under his command that the Indian Air Force carried out strikes at Pakistan-based terror camps in Balakot, Pakistan after the ghastly Pulwama terror attack in February. (With inputs from ANI)

Was always prepared to strike Pak terror camps, central leadership had to take call: Former Air Force chief

<p>The Indian Army on Sunday used artillery guns to target terrorist camps in Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK) which have been actively trying to push terrorists into Indian Territory.</p>

<p>Four launch pads in Neelam valley of PoK were targeted and fatalities have been reported, sources said.</p>

<p>This comes after an <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/indian-army-causes-heavy-damage-to-pak-side-after-2-soldiers-1-civilian-killed-in-ceasefire-violation-257023">unprovoked ceasefire violation</a> was started by the Pakistani side to push infiltrators into the Indian side, according to sources.</p>

<p>Two Indian soldiers and a civilian were killed in firing by Pakistan Army in Tangdhar sector of Kupwara in Jammu and Kashmir.</p>

<p>In retaliation, the Indian Army inflicted heavy damages and casualties on the Pakistan side.</p>

<p>"Indian Forces caused heavy damages and casualty to Pakistan after two Indian soldiers and one civilian were killed in ceasefire violation by Pakistan Army in Tangdhar sector," an Indian Army spokesperson said.&nbsp;</p>


The Indian Army on Sunday used artillery guns to target terrorist camps in Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK) which have been actively trying to push terrorists into Indian Territory.

The Indian Army on Sunday used artillery guns to target terrorist camps in Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK) which have been actively trying to push terrorists into Indian Territory. Four launch pads in Neelam valley of PoK were targeted and fatalities have been reported, sources said. This comes after an unprovoked ceasefire violation was started by the Pakistani side to push infiltrators into the Indian side, according to sources. Two Indian soldiers and a civilian were killed in firing by Pakistan Army in Tangdhar sector of Kupwara in Jammu and Kashmir. In retaliation, the Indian Army inflicted heavy damages and casualties on the Pakistan side. "Indian Forces caused heavy damages and casualty to Pakistan after two Indian soldiers and one civilian were killed in ceasefire violation by Pakistan Army in Tangdhar sector," an Indian Army spokesperson said.

Indian Army launches artillery attack on terror camps in PoK

<p>Indian Air Force (IAF) launched an early morning air strike across the Line of Control (LoC) on Tuesday destroying terrorist camps in Pakistan, reported news agency ANI.</p>

<p>The strike&nbsp;is in retaliation to <a href="http://www.wionews.com/india-news/jk-mastermind-of-pulwama-attack-killed-in-encounter-4-soldiers-dead-too-198057">Pulwama terror attack</a> in which more than 40 CRPF soldiers were killed.</p>

<p>Balakot, Chakothi and Muzaffarabad terror launch pads across the LOC were completely destroyed in IAF air strikes, reported ANI.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.wionews.com/south-asia/pakistan-claims-indian-air-force-violated-loc-199740">Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) </a>control rooms were also destroyed, the report added.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The Army/IAF&nbsp;will brief the media about the attack and the operation details later in the day, sources said.</p>

<p>IAF used Laser guided bombs during operation and Jaguar recorded all operations for analysis, sources said.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Around 200-300 terrorists believed to have been killed in the strikes, sources added.&nbsp;</p>

<p>12 Mirage 2000 jets participated in the operation that dropped 1000 Kg bombs on terror camps across Line of Control (LOC), reported news agency ANI quoting IAF.</p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">IAF Sources: 1000 Kg bombs were dropped on terror camps across the LoC <a href="https://t.co/jpC2w5f8X7">https://t.co/jpC2w5f8X7</a></p>
— ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1100228529952866304?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 26, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<p>According to ANI, the 21 minutes long airstrikes that destroyed several terror camps&nbsp;was carried out around 3:30 am on February 26.</p>

<p>Meanwhile, IAF has put on high alert all air defence systems along the international border and LoC to respond to any possible action by Pakistan Air Force.</p>


Indian Air Force (IAF) launched an early morning air strike across the Line of Control (LoC) on Tuesday destroying terrorist camps in Pakistan, reported news agency ANI.

Indian Air Force (IAF) launched an early morning air strike across the Line of Control (LoC) on Tuesday destroying terrorist camps in Pakistan, reported news agency ANI. The strike is in retaliation to Pulwama terror attack in which more than 40 CRPF soldiers were killed. Balakot, Chakothi and Muzaffarabad terror launch pads across the LOC were completely destroyed in IAF air strikes, reported ANI. Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) control rooms were also destroyed, the report added. The Army/IAF will brief the media about the attack and the operation details later in the day, sources said. IAF used Laser guided bombs during operation and Jaguar recorded all operations for analysis, sources said. Around 200-300 terrorists believed to have been killed in the strikes, sources added. 12 Mirage 2000 jets participated in the operation that dropped 1000 Kg bombs on terror camps across Line of Control (LOC), reported news agency ANI quoting IAF. IAF Sources: 1000 Kg bombs were dropped on terror camps across the LoC https://t.co/jpC2w5f8X7 — ANI (@ANI) February 26, 2019 × According to ANI, the 21 minutes long airstrikes that destroyed several terror camps was carried out around 3:30 am on February 26. Meanwhile, IAF has put on high alert all air defence systems along the international border and LoC to respond to any possible action by Pakistan Air Force.

India destroys terror camps across LoC with 1000 Kg bombs in early morning air strikes

<p>India carried out early morning <a href="http://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-carries-out-air-strikes-in-pakistan-199776">airstrikes on terror launch pads</a> in Pakistan and is believed to have destroyed terrorist targets.&nbsp;</p>

<p>From cricket fraternity, former cricketers Virender Sehwag, Gautam Gambhir were the first ones to respond to the strikes conducted by the Indian Air Force.&nbsp;</p>

<p>With a hashtag #SudharJaaoWarnaSudhaarDenge, Sehwag tweeted, "The boys have played really well."&nbsp;</p>

<p>Tendulkar also hailed Indian Air Force saying, "Our niceness should never be comprehended as our weakness. I salute the IAF, Jai Hind."</p>

<p>Twelve Mirage 2000 jets participated in the operation that dropped 1000 Kg bombs on terror camps across Line of Control (LOC), reported news agency ANI quoting IAF.&nbsp;</p>

<p><strong>In pics:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.wionews.com/photos/how-indian-air-force-carried-out-air-strikes-on-terror-pads-across-loc-199784">How Indian Air Force carried out air strikes on terror pads across LoC</a></strong></p>

<p>IAF used laser-guided bombs during operation and Jaguar recorded all operations for analysis, sources said.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The air strikes were non-military pre-emptive action was targeted specifically at JeM camp and the aircrafts took off from Gwalior in batches.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Before the air strikes, surveillance was done by Heron drones, which was taken over from a secret airfield.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Presentation of air strikes was given by senior IAF Offical to NSA and PM.&nbsp;</p>

<p><strong>Here is what Sehwag tweeted:</strong></p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">The boys have played really well. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SudharJaaoWarnaSudhaarDenge?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#SudharJaaoWarnaSudhaarDenge</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/airstrike?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#airstrike</a></p>
— Virender Sehwag (@virendersehwag) <a href="https://twitter.com/virendersehwag/status/1100254915010666496?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 26, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<p dir="ltr" lang="cy">JAI HIND, IAF 🇮🇳 <a href="https://twitter.com/IAF_MCC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@IAF_MCC</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/adgpi?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@adgpi</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/IndiaStrikesAgain?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#IndiaStrikesAgain</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/IndiaStrikesBack?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#IndiaStrikesBack</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/IndiaStrikes?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#IndiaStrikes</a></p>
— Gautam Gambhir (@GautamGambhir) <a href="https://twitter.com/GautamGambhir/status/1100249948552155136?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 26, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Our niceness should never be comprehended as our weakness.<br />
I salute the IAF, Jai Hind 🇮🇳</p>
— Sachin Tendulkar (@sachin_rt) <a href="https://twitter.com/sachin_rt/status/1100318212846161920?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 26, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<p>Spinner&nbsp;Yuzvendra Chahal tweeted.&nbsp;</p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Indian Air Force 🇮🇳👏 Bohot Hard Bohot Hard <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/IndiaStrikesBack?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#IndiaStrikesBack</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/JaiHind?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#JaiHind</a> 🇮🇳🇮🇳</p>
— Yuzvendra Chahal (@yuzi_chahal) <a href="https://twitter.com/yuzi_chahal/status/1100253015724969985?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 26, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<p>The strikes were carried out at Muzaffarabad, Chakoti and Balakot - the terror hub in Pakistan.</p>

<p>Balakot, a town in Pakistan's Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province, is about 50km from the Line of Control and known among the intelligence agencies as "epicentre of jihad". It and has been on the radar of American forces for a long time.</p>

<p>Analysts allege that many Pakistan-based terror groups have their base and training camps in the area. Terror group Jaish-e-Mohammed chose Balakot for its base after Taliban were routed in the year 2001. Jaish-supported Al-Rehman Trust is also active in the area, according to intelligence agencies.</p>


India carried out early morning airstrikes on terror launch pads in Pakistan and is believed to have destroyed terrorist targets. From cricket fraternity, former cricketers Virender Sehwag, Gautam Gambhir were the first ones to respond to the strikes conducted by the Indian Air Force.

India carried out early morning airstrikes on terror launch pads in Pakistan and is believed to have destroyed terrorist targets. From cricket fraternity, former cricketers Virender Sehwag, Gautam Gambhir were the first ones to respond to the strikes conducted by the Indian Air Force. With a hashtag #SudharJaaoWarnaSudhaarDenge, Sehwag tweeted, "The boys have played really well." Tendulkar also hailed Indian Air Force saying, "Our niceness should never be comprehended as our weakness. I salute the IAF, Jai Hind." Twelve Mirage 2000 jets participated in the operation that dropped 1000 Kg bombs on terror camps across Line of Control (LOC), reported news agency ANI quoting IAF. In pics: How Indian Air Force carried out air strikes on terror pads across LoC IAF used laser-guided bombs during operation and Jaguar recorded all operations for analysis, sources said. The air strikes were non-military pre-emptive action was targeted specifically at JeM camp and the aircrafts took off from Gwalior in batches. Before the air strikes, surveillance was done by Heron drones, which was taken over from a secret airfield. Presentation of air strikes was given by senior IAF Offical to NSA and PM. Here is what Sehwag tweeted: The boys have played really well. #SudharJaaoWarnaSudhaarDenge #airstrike — Virender Sehwag (@virendersehwag) February 26, 2019 × JAI HIND, IAF 🇮🇳 @IAF_MCC @adgpi #IndiaStrikesAgain #IndiaStrikesBack #IndiaStrikes — Gautam Gambhir (@GautamGambhir) February 26, 2019 × Our niceness should never be comprehended as our weakness. I salute the IAF, Jai Hind 🇮🇳 — Sachin Tendulkar (@sachin_rt) February 26, 2019 × Spinner Yuzvendra Chahal tweeted. Indian Air Force 🇮🇳👏 Bohot Hard Bohot Hard #IndiaStrikesBack #JaiHind 🇮🇳🇮🇳 — Yuzvendra Chahal (@yuzi_chahal) February 26, 2019 × The strikes were carried out at Muzaffarabad, Chakoti and Balakot - the terror hub in Pakistan. Balakot, a town in Pakistan's Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province, is about 50km from the Line of Control and known among the intelligence agencies as "epicentre of jihad". It and has been on the radar of American forces for a long time. Analysts allege that many Pakistan-based terror groups have their base and training camps in the area. Terror group Jaish-e-Mohammed chose Balakot for its base after Taliban were routed in the year 2001. Jaish-supported Al-Rehman Trust is also active in the area, according to intelligence agencies.

Virender Sehwag, Gautam Gambhir hail India Air Force for destroying terror camps across LoC

<p>President Donald Trump&#39;s administration appears ready to harden its approach toward Pakistan to crack down on Pakistan-based militants launching attacks in neighbouring Afghanistan, U.S. officials tell Reuters.</p>

<p>Potential Trump administration responses being discussed include expanding U.S. drone strikes, redirecting or withholding some aid to Pakistan and perhaps eventually downgrading Pakistan&#39;s status as a major non-NATO ally, the officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity.</p>

<p>Some U.S. officials, however, are skeptical of the prospects for success, arguing that years of previous U.S. efforts to curb Pakistan&#39;s support for militant groups have failed, and that already strengthening U.S. ties to India, Pakistan&#39;s arch-enemy, undermine chances of a breakthrough with Islamabad.</p>

<p>U.S. officials say they seek greater cooperation with Pakistan, not a rupture in ties, once the administration finishes a regional review of the strategy guiding the 16-year-old war in Afghanistan.</p>

<p>Precise actions have yet to be decided.</p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="row">
<div class="article-blockquote">
<div class="col-sm-10 col-sm-offset-1 blockquote-content quoteshare">
<blockquote>
<h5>Pakistan fiercely denies allowing any militants safe haven on its territory</h5>
</blockquote>
</div>

<div class="col-sm-1 blockquote-content">
<div class="share-blockquote"><a class="twitter popup" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Pakistan fiercely denies allowing any militants safe haven on its territory" target="_blank"><i class="fa fa-share">&nbsp;</i></a></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqquoteclosemark">&times;</a></div>
</div>
</div>

<p>The White House and Pentagon declined to comment on the review before its completion. Pakistan&#39;s embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.</p>

<p>&quot;The United States and Pakistan continue to partner on a range of national security issues,&quot; Pentagon spokesman Adam Stump said.</p>

<p>But the discussions alone suggest a shift toward a more assertive approach to address safe havens in Pakistan that have been blamed for in part helping turn Afghanistan&#39;s war into an intractable conflict.</p>

<p>Experts on America&#39;s longest war argue that militant safe havens in Pakistan have allowed Taliban-linked insurgents a place to plot deadly strikes in Afghanistan and regroup after ground offensives.</p>

<p>Although long mindful of Pakistan, the Trump administration in recent weeks has put more emphasis on the relationship with Islamabad in discussions as it hammers out a the regional strategy to be presented to Trump by mid-July, nearly six months after he took office, one official said.</p>

<p>&quot;We&#39;ve never really fully articulated what our strategy towards Pakistan is. The strategy will more clearly say what we want from Pakistan specifically,&quot; the U.S. official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.</p>

<p>Other U.S. officials warn of divisions within the government about the right approach and question whether any mix of carrots and sticks can get Islamabad to change its behavior. At the end of the day, Washington needs a partner, even if an imperfect one, in nuclear-armed Pakistan, they say.</p>

<p>The United States is again poised to deploy thousands more troops in Afghanistan, an acknowledgment that U.S.-backed forces are not winning and Taliban militants are resurgent.</p>

<p>Without more pressure on militants within Pakistan who target Afghanistan, experts say additional U.S. troop deployments will fail to meet their ultimate objective: to pressure the Taliban to eventually negotiate peace.</p>

<p>&quot;I believe there will be a much harder U.S. line on Pakistan going forward than there has been in the past,&quot; Hamdullah Mohib, the Afghan ambassador to the United States, told Reuters, without citing specific measures under review.</p>

<p>Kabul has long been critical of Pakistan&#39;s role in Afghanistan.</p>

<p>Pakistan fiercely denies allowing any militants safe haven on its territory. It bristles at U.S. claims that Pakistan&#39;s spy agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) directorate, has ties to Haqqani network militants blamed for some of the deadliest attacks in Afghanistan.</p>

<p>&quot;What Pakistan says is that we are already doing a lot and that our plate is already full,&quot; a senior Pakistani government source told Reuters, speaking on condition of anonymity.</p>

<p>The source doubted the Trump administration would press too hard, saying: &quot;They don&rsquo;t want to push Pakistan to abandon their war against terrorism.&quot;</p>

<p>Pakistani officials point towards the toll militancy has taken on the country. Since 2003, almost 22,000 civilians and nearly 7,000 Pakistani security forces have been killed as a result of militancy, according to the South Asia Terrorism Portal, which tracks violence.</p>

<p>Experts say Pakistan&#39;s policy towards Afghanistan is also driven in part by fears that India will gain influence in Afghanistan.</p>

<p><strong>IS PAKISTAN AN ALLY?</strong></p>

<p>Nuclear-armed Pakistan won the status as a major non-NATO ally in 2004 from the George Bush administration, in what was at the time seen in part as recognition of its importance in the U.S. battle against al Qaeda and Taliban insurgents.</p>

<p>The status is mainly symbolic, allowing limited benefits such as giving Pakistan faster access to surplus U.S. military hardware.</p>

<p>Some U.S. officials and experts on the region scoff at the title.</p>

<p>&quot;Pakistan is not an ally. It&rsquo;s not North Korea or Iran. But it&rsquo;s not an ally,&quot; said Bruce Riedel, a Pakistan expert at the Brookings Institution.</p>

<p>But yanking the title would be seen by Pakistan as a major blow.</p>

<p>&quot;The Pakistanis would take that very seriously because it would be a slap at their honor,&quot; said a former U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity.</p>

<p>Lisa Curtis, senior director for South and Central Asia at the National Security Council, co-authored a report with Husain Haqqani, Pakistan&#39;s former ambassador to Washington, in which they recommended the Trump administration warn Pakistan the status could be revoked in six months.</p>

<p>&quot;Thinking of Pakistan as an ally will continue to create problems for the next administration as it did for the last one,&quot; said the February report.</p>

<p>It was unclear how seriously the Trump administration was considering the proposal.</p>

<p>The growing danger to Afghanistan from suspected Pakistan-based militants was underscored by a devastating May 31 truck bomb that killed more than 80 people and wounded 460 in Afghanistan&#39;s capital, Kabul.</p>

<p>Afghanistan&#39;s main intelligence agency said the attack - one of the deadliest in memory in Kabul - had been carried out by the Haqqani network with assistance from Pakistan, a charge Islamabad denies.</p>

<p>Washington believes the strikes appeared to be the work of the Haqqani network, U.S. officials told Reuters.</p>

<p>U.S. frustration over the Haqqani&#39;s presence in Pakistan has been building for years. The United States designated the Haqqani network as a terrorist organization in 2012. U.S. Navy Admiral Mike Mullen, then the top U.S. military officer, told Congress in 2011 that the Haqqani network was a &quot;veritable arm&quot; of the ISI.</p>

<p>The potential U.S. pivot to a more assertive approach would be sharply different than the approach taken at the start of the Obama administration, when U.S. officials sought to court Pakistani leaders, including Army chief General Ashfaq Kayani.</p>

<p>David Sedney, who served as Obama&#39;s deputy assistant secretary of defense for Afghanistan, Pakistan and Central Asia from 2009 to 2013, said the attempt to turn Islamabad into a strategic partner was a &quot;disaster.&quot;</p>

<p>&quot;It didn&#39;t affect Pakistan&#39;s behavior one bit. In fact, I would argue it made Pakistan&#39;s behavior worse,&quot; Sedney said.</p>

<p><strong>MORE DRONES, CASH CUT-OFF</strong></p>

<p>Pakistan has received more than $33 billion in U.S. assistance since 2002, including more than $14 billion in so-called Coalition Support Funds (CSF), a U.S. Defense Department program to reimburse allies that have incurred costs in supporting counter-insurgency operations.</p>

<p>It is an important form of foreign currency for the nuclear-armed country and one that is getting particularly close scrutiny during the Trump administration review.</p>

<p>Last year, the Pentagon decided not to pay Pakistan $300 million in CSF funding after then-U.S. Secretary of Defense Ash Carter declined to sign authorization that Pakistan was taking adequate action against the Haqqani network.</p>

<p>U.S. officials said the Trump administration was discussing withholding at least some assistance to Pakistan.</p>

<p>Curtis&#39; report also singled out the aid as a target.</p>

<p>But U.S. aid cuts could cede even more influence to China, which already has committed nearly $60 billion in investments in Pakistan.</p>

<p>Another option under review is broadening a drone campaign to penetrate deeper into Pakistan to target Haqqani fighters and other militants blamed for attacks in Afghanistan, U.S. officials and a Pakistan expert said.</p>

<p>&quot;Now the Americans (will be) saying, you aren&#39;t taking out our enemies, so therefore we are taking them out ourselves,&quot; the Pakistan expert, who declined to be identified, said.</p>

<p>Pakistan&#39;s army chief of staff last week criticized &quot;unilateral actions&quot; such as drone strikes as &quot;counterproductive and against (the) spirit of ongoing cooperation and intelligence sharing being diligently undertaken by Pakistan&quot;.</p>


The Trump administration is also mulling the redirecting or withholding of some aid to Pakistan

President Donald Trump's administration appears ready to harden its approach toward Pakistan to crack down on Pakistan-based militants launching attacks in neighbouring Afghanistan, U.S. officials tell Reuters. Potential Trump administration responses being discussed include expanding U.S. drone strikes, redirecting or withholding some aid to Pakistan and perhaps eventually downgrading Pakistan's status as a major non-NATO ally, the officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity. Some U.S. officials, however, are skeptical of the prospects for success, arguing that years of previous U.S. efforts to curb Pakistan's support for militant groups have failed, and that already strengthening U.S. ties to India, Pakistan's arch-enemy, undermine chances of a breakthrough with Islamabad. U.S. officials say they seek greater cooperation with Pakistan, not a rupture in ties, once the administration finishes a regional review of the strategy guiding the 16-year-old war in Afghanistan. Precise actions have yet to be decided. Pakistan fiercely denies allowing any militants safe haven on its territory × The White House and Pentagon declined to comment on the review before its completion. Pakistan's embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. "The United States and Pakistan continue to partner on a range of national security issues," Pentagon spokesman Adam Stump said. But the discussions alone suggest a shift toward a more assertive approach to address safe havens in Pakistan that have been blamed for in part helping turn Afghanistan's war into an intractable conflict. Experts on America's longest war argue that militant safe havens in Pakistan have allowed Taliban-linked insurgents a place to plot deadly strikes in Afghanistan and regroup after ground offensives. Although long mindful of Pakistan, the Trump administration in recent weeks has put more emphasis on the relationship with Islamabad in discussions as it hammers out a the regional strategy to be presented to Trump by mid-July, nearly six months after he took office, one official said. "We've never really fully articulated what our strategy towards Pakistan is. The strategy will more clearly say what we want from Pakistan specifically," the U.S. official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. Other U.S. officials warn of divisions within the government about the right approach and question whether any mix of carrots and sticks can get Islamabad to change its behavior. At the end of the day, Washington needs a partner, even if an imperfect one, in nuclear-armed Pakistan, they say. The United States is again poised to deploy thousands more troops in Afghanistan, an acknowledgment that U.S.-backed forces are not winning and Taliban militants are resurgent. Without more pressure on militants within Pakistan who target Afghanistan, experts say additional U.S. troop deployments will fail to meet their ultimate objective: to pressure the Taliban to eventually negotiate peace. "I believe there will be a much harder U.S. line on Pakistan going forward than there has been in the past," Hamdullah Mohib, the Afghan ambassador to the United States, told Reuters, without citing specific measures under review. Kabul has long been critical of Pakistan's role in Afghanistan. Pakistan fiercely denies allowing any militants safe haven on its territory. It bristles at U.S. claims that Pakistan's spy agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) directorate, has ties to Haqqani network militants blamed for some of the deadliest attacks in Afghanistan. "What Pakistan says is that we are already doing a lot and that our plate is already full," a senior Pakistani government source told Reuters, speaking on condition of anonymity. The source doubted the Trump administration would press too hard, saying: "They don’t want to push Pakistan to abandon their war against terrorism." Pakistani officials point towards the toll militancy has taken on the country. Since 2003, almost 22,000 civilians and nearly 7,000 Pakistani security forces have been killed as a result of militancy, according to the South Asia Terrorism Portal, which tracks violence. Experts say Pakistan's policy towards Afghanistan is also driven in part by fears that India will gain influence in Afghanistan. IS PAKISTAN AN ALLY? Nuclear-armed Pakistan won the status as a major non-NATO ally in 2004 from the George Bush administration, in what was at the time seen in part as recognition of its importance in the U.S. battle against al Qaeda and Taliban insurgents. The status is mainly symbolic, allowing limited benefits such as giving Pakistan faster access to surplus U.S. military hardware. Some U.S. officials and experts on the region scoff at the title. "Pakistan is not an ally. It’s not North Korea or Iran. But it’s not an ally," said Bruce Riedel, a Pakistan expert at the Brookings Institution. But yanking the title would be seen by Pakistan as a major blow. "The Pakistanis would take that very seriously because it would be a slap at their honor," said a former U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity. Lisa Curtis, senior director for South and Central Asia at the National Security Council, co-authored a report with Husain Haqqani, Pakistan's former ambassador to Washington, in which they recommended the Trump administration warn Pakistan the status could be revoked in six months. "Thinking of Pakistan as an ally will continue to create problems for the next administration as it did for the last one," said the February report. It was unclear how seriously the Trump administration was considering the proposal. The growing danger to Afghanistan from suspected Pakistan-based militants was underscored by a devastating May 31 truck bomb that killed more than 80 people and wounded 460 in Afghanistan's capital, Kabul. Afghanistan's main intelligence agency said the attack - one of the deadliest in memory in Kabul - had been carried out by the Haqqani network with assistance from Pakistan, a charge Islamabad denies. Washington believes the strikes appeared to be the work of the Haqqani network, U.S. officials told Reuters. U.S. frustration over the Haqqani's presence in Pakistan has been building for years. The United States designated the Haqqani network as a terrorist organization in 2012. U.S. Navy Admiral Mike Mullen, then the top U.S. military officer, told Congress in 2011 that the Haqqani network was a "veritable arm" of the ISI. The potential U.S. pivot to a more assertive approach would be sharply different than the approach taken at the start of the Obama administration, when U.S. officials sought to court Pakistani leaders, including Army chief General Ashfaq Kayani. David Sedney, who served as Obama's deputy assistant secretary of defense for Afghanistan, Pakistan and Central Asia from 2009 to 2013, said the attempt to turn Islamabad into a strategic partner was a "disaster." "It didn't affect Pakistan's behavior one bit. In fact, I would argue it made Pakistan's behavior worse," Sedney said. MORE DRONES, CASH CUT-OFF Pakistan has received more than $33 billion in U.S. assistance since 2002, including more than $14 billion in so-called Coalition Support Funds (CSF), a U.S. Defense Department program to reimburse allies that have incurred costs in supporting counter-insurgency operations. It is an important form of foreign currency for the nuclear-armed country and one that is getting particularly close scrutiny during the Trump administration review. Last year, the Pentagon decided not to pay Pakistan $300 million in CSF funding after then-U.S. Secretary of Defense Ash Carter declined to sign authorization that Pakistan was taking adequate action against the Haqqani network. U.S. officials said the Trump administration was discussing withholding at least some assistance to Pakistan. Curtis' report also singled out the aid as a target. But U.S. aid cuts could cede even more influence to China, which already has committed nearly $60 billion in investments in Pakistan. Another option under review is broadening a drone campaign to penetrate deeper into Pakistan to target Haqqani fighters and other militants blamed for attacks in Afghanistan, U.S. officials and a Pakistan expert said. "Now the Americans (will be) saying, you aren't taking out our enemies, so therefore we are taking them out ourselves," the Pakistan expert, who declined to be identified, said. Pakistan's army chief of staff last week criticized "unilateral actions" such as drone strikes as "counterproductive and against (the) spirit of ongoing cooperation and intelligence sharing being diligently undertaken by Pakistan".

Trump may expand drone strikes in Pakistan, to contain militants attacking Afghanistan

terror-camps

Terror Camps, News on Terror Camps, stories on Terror Camps, articles on Terror Camps, Terror Camps stories at Wion, Terror Camps news, Terror Camps latest news