The Delhi High Court on Tuesday issued a notice on a petition filed by Sushant Singh Rajput`s father seeking a ban on the release of any movie on his life. 
 
Sushant Singh Rajput`s father Krishan Kishore Singh has approached Delhi High Court in light of the recent news articles and publications regarding movies and other ventures depicting his personal life, name/ images/caricature/lifestyle /likeness in form of biopic or story, plea states. 
 
Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri on Wednesday sought a response from respondents while slated the matter for getting on May 25th. 
 
Senior Advocate Vikas Singh appearing for SSRs father states that any such publication, production, or depiction of the private life of the late actor is a blatant and willful breach of the right to a fair trial guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, personality rights and the common law tort of passing off in misappropriating well-known personality without consent for commercial gains. 
 
The petition states that the plaintiff (SSR`s Father) and his deceased has the right of privacy or a right to be alone under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. They have the right to safeguard their privacy, their families` privacy and deceased persons in the family. None can publish anything whether truthful or otherwise or whether laudatory or critical about the life of Sushant Singh Rajput without the consent of Plaintiff. It is not possible to depict or portray the life of Sushant Singh Rajput without depicting or portraying the life of his family members including his near relatives and the Plaintiff. 
 
It states that the plaintiff (SSR`s father) was apprised that different ventures are making movies, series or forming associations to misappropriate the personality of Plaintiff`s son. These ventures are designed to malign the image of the son of the plaintiff and his family members, further, to derail the present investigation in the CBI case registered against the accused persons is a violation of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. 
 
The Defendants are also trying to misappropriate the well know personality right of Sushant Singh and to manipulate the public perception in order to make commercial gains out of it, which shall not be allowed as same will cause grave prejudice and irreparable injury to Plaintiff and his family members. 
 
Plea mentions that the plaintiff apprehended that a distorted version of his son`s life will be presented to the public, without the consent of plaintiff, which would be defamatory in nature and would be deceptive to the public at large to make them believe that these ventures are backed by plaintiff or his family. 
 
The plaintiff also apprehends that his and privacy of his son would be infringed by such public deception. 
 
The petition also seeks order and decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendants by themselves, their directors, principal officers, successors-in-business, assigns, servants, agents, distributors, advertiser or anyone other than the Defendants from using plaintiff son`s name/caricature/lifestyle or likeness in their forthcoming project/ films in any manner whatsoever amounting to infiltration of personality rights by such unauthorized use.&nbsp;

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday issued a notice on a petition filed by Sushant Singh Rajput`s father seeking a ban on the release of any movie on his life. Sushant Singh Rajput`s father Krishan Kishore Singh has approached Delhi High Court in light of the recent news articles and publications regarding movies and other ventures depicting his personal life, name/ images/caricature/lifestyle /likeness in form of biopic or story, plea states.

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday issued a notice on a petition filed by Sushant Singh Rajput`s father seeking a ban on the release of any movie on his life. Sushant Singh Rajput`s father Krishan Kishore Singh has approached Delhi High Court in light of the recent news articles and publications regarding movies and other ventures depicting his personal life, name/ images/caricature/lifestyle /likeness in form of biopic or story, plea states. Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri on Wednesday sought a response from respondents while slated the matter for getting on May 25th. Senior Advocate Vikas Singh appearing for SSRs father states that any such publication, production, or depiction of the private life of the late actor is a blatant and willful breach of the right to a fair trial guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, personality rights and the common law tort of passing off in misappropriating well-known personality without consent for commercial gains. The petition states that the plaintiff (SSR`s Father) and his deceased has the right of privacy or a right to be alone under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. They have the right to safeguard their privacy, their families` privacy and deceased persons in the family. None can publish anything whether truthful or otherwise or whether laudatory or critical about the life of Sushant Singh Rajput without the consent of Plaintiff. It is not possible to depict or portray the life of Sushant Singh Rajput without depicting or portraying the life of his family members including his near relatives and the Plaintiff. It states that the plaintiff (SSR`s father) was apprised that different ventures are making movies, series or forming associations to misappropriate the personality of Plaintiff`s son. These ventures are designed to malign the image of the son of the plaintiff and his family members, further, to derail the present investigation in the CBI case registered against the accused persons is a violation of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The Defendants are also trying to misappropriate the well know personality right of Sushant Singh and to manipulate the public perception in order to make commercial gains out of it, which shall not be allowed as same will cause grave prejudice and irreparable injury to Plaintiff and his family members. Plea mentions that the plaintiff apprehended that a distorted version of his son`s life will be presented to the public, without the consent of plaintiff, which would be defamatory in nature and would be deceptive to the public at large to make them believe that these ventures are backed by plaintiff or his family. The plaintiff also apprehends that his and privacy of his son would be infringed by such public deception. The petition also seeks order and decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendants by themselves, their directors, principal officers, successors-in-business, assigns, servants, agents, distributors, advertiser or anyone other than the Defendants from using plaintiff son`s name/caricature/lifestyle or likeness in their forthcoming project/ films in any manner whatsoever amounting to infiltration of personality rights by such unauthorized use.

Sushant Singh Rajput's father seeks ban on release of any movie on his son's life

Bollywood actress Rhea Chakraborty has alleged that late actor Sushant Singh Rajput's father has used his 'influence' in lodging an FIR against her in Patna. Sushant's father has accused her of the abetment of suicide of his son. 
 
Rajput, aged 34, was found hanging from the ceiling of his apartment in suburban Bandra in Mumbai on June 14 and since then the Mumbai police have been probing the case keeping in mind various angles. The actor's family has lodged a separate complaint against Rhea in Patna, Bihar. 
 
The allegations in the FIR lodged at Patna against Rhea 'reflect the influence' of Rajput's father in illegally roping her in the case, said the petition filed by her in SC on Wednesday seeking transfer of the FIR from Patna to Mumbai, 
"The Petitioner is an actress and is into acting since 2012. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case, the Petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case filed at the instance of Krishna Kishore Singh-father of the deceased," the plea said. 
 
Rhea in her plea admitted that she was in a live-in relationship with Rajput and has been in deep trauma due the death of the actor and moreover getting rape and death threats. 
 
" Petitioner has also received various death and rape threats and she is in deep trauma due to the loss of deceased, which is multiplied further due to the media sensitivity of the case," it said, adding that she has also filed a complaint at Santa Cruz police station against the rape and death threats. 
 
She said, "It is pertinent to mention that the deceased and petitioner were in live-in relationship since a year up till June 8, 2020 when the petitioner had temporarily shifted to her own residence in Mumbai." 
 
Her plea said, "Deceased was suffering from depression for some time and was also on anti-depressants and he committed suicide on the morning of June 14, 2020 at his Bandra residence by hanging himself. Unnatural death report' was filed by Bandra police station at Mumbai and causes leading to taking of such drastic steps are being examined." 
 
Rhea said that she was summoned by the Bandra police on various occasions and her statement was also recorded under section 175 of CrpC and she understands that the probe of Mumbai police is still going on as some of the forensic reports are still awaited. 
 
She said that Section 177 of CrPC mandates that every offence shall be inquired into and shall be tried by the magistrate within whose local jurisdiction it was committed. 
 
Rhea said that even there is an iota of truth in the case registered by Rajput's father, the jurisdiction to probe the offence would still lie with the Bandra Police Station. 
 
"However, in the present case, after recording the FIR, the investigation has been mechanically commenced wholly without jurisdiction by sending report to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 3, Patna Sadar, instead of sending the FIR to the jurisdictional ACMM, Bandra, Mumbai and Bandra Police station," the plea said. 
 
She said that it becomes abundantly clear that the commencement of investigation in Patna is erroneous in absence of any cause of action having arisen thereto in Patna. 
 
The entire cause of action as alleged in the FIR had arisen at Bandra in Mumbai, her plea said. 
 
"It would be just and expedient if the transfer of the case is directed from Patna to Mumbai. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents (father of the Sushant and Bihar police), if the direction sought herein is issued by this court," the transfer plea said.

Bollywood actress Rhea Chakraborty has alleged that late actor Sushant Singh Rajput's father has used his 'influence' in lodging an FIR against her in Patna. Sushant's father has accused her of the abetment of suicide of his son.

Bollywood actress Rhea Chakraborty has alleged that late actor Sushant Singh Rajput's father has used his 'influence' in lodging an FIR against her in Patna. Sushant's father has accused her of the abetment of suicide of his son. Rajput, aged 34, was found hanging from the ceiling of his apartment in suburban Bandra in Mumbai on June 14 and since then the Mumbai police have been probing the case keeping in mind various angles. The actor's family has lodged a separate complaint against Rhea in Patna, Bihar. The allegations in the FIR lodged at Patna against Rhea 'reflect the influence' of Rajput's father in illegally roping her in the case, said the petition filed by her in SC on Wednesday seeking transfer of the FIR from Patna to Mumbai, "The Petitioner is an actress and is into acting since 2012. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case, the Petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case filed at the instance of Krishna Kishore Singh-father of the deceased," the plea said. Rhea in her plea admitted that she was in a live-in relationship with Rajput and has been in deep trauma due the death of the actor and moreover getting rape and death threats. " Petitioner has also received various death and rape threats and she is in deep trauma due to the loss of deceased, which is multiplied further due to the media sensitivity of the case," it said, adding that she has also filed a complaint at Santa Cruz police station against the rape and death threats. She said, "It is pertinent to mention that the deceased and petitioner were in live-in relationship since a year up till June 8, 2020 when the petitioner had temporarily shifted to her own residence in Mumbai." Her plea said, "Deceased was suffering from depression for some time and was also on anti-depressants and he committed suicide on the morning of June 14, 2020 at his Bandra residence by hanging himself. Unnatural death report' was filed by Bandra police station at Mumbai and causes leading to taking of such drastic steps are being examined." Rhea said that she was summoned by the Bandra police on various occasions and her statement was also recorded under section 175 of CrpC and she understands that the probe of Mumbai police is still going on as some of the forensic reports are still awaited. She said that Section 177 of CrPC mandates that every offence shall be inquired into and shall be tried by the magistrate within whose local jurisdiction it was committed. Rhea said that even there is an iota of truth in the case registered by Rajput's father, the jurisdiction to probe the offence would still lie with the Bandra Police Station. "However, in the present case, after recording the FIR, the investigation has been mechanically commenced wholly without jurisdiction by sending report to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 3, Patna Sadar, instead of sending the FIR to the jurisdictional ACMM, Bandra, Mumbai and Bandra Police station," the plea said. She said that it becomes abundantly clear that the commencement of investigation in Patna is erroneous in absence of any cause of action having arisen thereto in Patna. The entire cause of action as alleged in the FIR had arisen at Bandra in Mumbai, her plea said. "It would be just and expedient if the transfer of the case is directed from Patna to Mumbai. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents (father of the Sushant and Bihar police), if the direction sought herein is issued by this court," the transfer plea said.

Rhea Chakraborty alleges Sushant's father used 'influence' in roping her in son's death case

sushant-singh-rajput-father

Sushant Singh Rajput Father, News on Sushant Singh Rajput Father, stories on Sushant Singh Rajput Father, articles on Sushant Singh Rajput Father, Sushant Singh Rajput Father stories at Wion, Sushant Singh Rajput Father news, Sushant Singh Rajput Father latest news

sushant singh-rajput-father

Sushant Singh Rajput's father seeks ban on release of any movie on his son's life

Rhea Chakraborty alleges Sushant's father used 'influence' in roping her in son's death case