The Supreme Court of India is set to hear the petitions that are seeking a review of the <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/ayodhya-verdict-up-shia-central-waqf-board-chairman-raises-objection-against-allotment-of-5-acre-land-to-sunnis-267473">Ayodhya land verdict</a>.

The five-judge constitution bench will hear the petitions at 1.40 pm tomorrow.&nbsp;

Justice Sanjiv Khanna, who replaced the former Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi will decide whether the hearing should take place in an open court or in a chamber.

Earlier in the day, Hindu litigant Nirmohi Akhara filed a review petition in the apex court.&nbsp;

A five-judge bench ruled in favour of Ram Lalla last month. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/six-review-pleas-filed-in-supreme-court-over-ayodhya-land-verdict-266711">The disputed land</a> spread over 2.7 acres was then allotted for the construction of Ram temple, overlooked by a trust formed by the government.&nbsp;

Additionally, five acres of land at a prominent location was given for the construction of a mosque. The court has also asked the central government to give representation to the Nirmohi Akhara in the new trust.

Ever since <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/ayodhya-security-tightened-ahead-of-babri-masjids-demolition-anniversary-266485">the judgment</a> was announced, many review petitions have been filed.

(With inputs from ANI)

The Supreme Court of India is set to hear the petitions that are seeking a review of the Ayodhya land verdict. The five-judge constitution bench will hear the petitions at 1.

The Supreme Court of India is set to hear the petitions that are seeking a review of the Ayodhya land verdict. The five-judge constitution bench will hear the petitions at 1.40 pm tomorrow. Justice Sanjiv Khanna, who replaced the former Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi will decide whether the hearing should take place in an open court or in a chamber. Earlier in the day, Hindu litigant Nirmohi Akhara filed a review petition in the apex court. A five-judge bench ruled in favour of Ram Lalla last month. The disputed land spread over 2.7 acres was then allotted for the construction of Ram temple, overlooked by a trust formed by the government. Additionally, five acres of land at a prominent location was given for the construction of a mosque. The court has also asked the central government to give representation to the Nirmohi Akhara in the new trust. Ever since the judgment was announced, many review petitions have been filed. (With inputs from ANI)

Ayodhya land verdict: Supreme Court to hear review petitions tomorrow

Akshay Kumar Singh, one of the convicts in the brutal December 16, 2012, gang-rape and murder case, on Tuesday, filed a review petition in the Supreme Court seeking modification and leniency. 
 
Singh was sentenced to death by a trial court on September 13, 2013, for raping and murdering the 23-year-old woman physiotherapist on the&nbsp;night of December 16, 2012, in the national capital. 
 
His sentence was upheld by the Delhi High Court and finally by the Supreme Court. 
 
The convict,&nbsp;Akshay,&nbsp;in his review petition pleaded and requested the Supreme Court to consider his prayer and review its earlier judgement of May 5, 2017, in which the top cop sentenced him to the gallows. 
 
"We are requesting the apex court to conduct the review petition hearing in an open court," Dr AP Singh, the lawyer for the convict, told ANI. 
 
The apex court had on May 5, 2017, upheld the death sentence of all the four convicts in the brutal December 16 gangrape and murder case. 
The apex court, while dismissing the appeal of the four convicts, had said that the crime fell in the rarest of rare category and "shaken the conscience of the society."

Akshay Kumar Singh, one of the convicts in the brutal December 16, 2012, gang-rape and murder case, on Tuesday, filed a review petition in the Supreme Court seeking modification and leniency.

Akshay Kumar Singh, one of the convicts in the brutal December 16, 2012, gang-rape and murder case, on Tuesday, filed a review petition in the Supreme Court seeking modification and leniency. Singh was sentenced to death by a trial court on September 13, 2013, for raping and murdering the 23-year-old woman physiotherapist on the night of December 16, 2012, in the national capital. His sentence was upheld by the Delhi High Court and finally by the Supreme Court. The convict, Akshay, in his review petition pleaded and requested the Supreme Court to consider his prayer and review its earlier judgement of May 5, 2017, in which the top cop sentenced him to the gallows. "We are requesting the apex court to conduct the review petition hearing in an open court," Dr AP Singh, the lawyer for the convict, told ANI. The apex court had on May 5, 2017, upheld the death sentence of all the four convicts in the brutal December 16 gangrape and murder case. The apex court, while dismissing the appeal of the four convicts, had said that the crime fell in the rarest of rare category and "shaken the conscience of the society."

Nirbhaya case: Convict files review petition seeking leniency in Supreme Court

All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) on Wednesday said that it will file a petition seeking review of Supreme Court's order in Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi case next month. 
 
"Exercising our constitutional right, we are going to file a review petition in the Babri masjid case during the first week of December," the organisation stated in a tweet.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
"Exercising our constitutional right, we are going to file a review petition in the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Babrimasjidcase?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Babrimasjidcase</a> during the first week of December. Sunni Waqf Board's decision not to pursue the case won't legally affect us. All Muslim organizations are on the same page" <a href="https://twitter.com/Zafaryab_Jilani?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Zafaryab_Jilani</a>:
— All India Muslim Personal Law Board (@AIMPLB_Official) <a href="https://twitter.com/AIMPLB_Official/status/1199576085098385408?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 27, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

They also said that the Sunni Waqf Board's decision not to pursue the case will not affect them legally. "All Muslim organisations are on the same page," it added. 
 
The Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board had yesterday said it would not file a review petition against the apex court's verdict in the case but was yet to take a call on whether to accept a five-acre alternative plot for a mosque. 
 
"There was no discussion about the land which will be offered by the government. When the land will be offered, then a meeting of the board will commence about it," Abdul Razzaq Khan, member Sunni Waqf Board, had said. 
 
Earlier this month, a five-judge Supreme Court bench led by then-CJI Ranjan Gogoi unanimously ruled in favour of Ram Lalla and said the entire disputed land spread over 2.7 acres will be handed over to a trust formed by the government, which will monitor the construction of a Ram temple at the site. 
 
The top court also added that an alternative five acres of land at a <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/pm-narendra-modi-slams-congress-over-ayodhya-article-370-issue-264485">prominent location in Ayodhya</a> should be allotted for the construction of a mosque following consultation between the Centre and the state government.

All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) on Wednesday said that it will file a petition seeking review of Supreme Court's order in Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi case next month.

All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) on Wednesday said that it will file a petition seeking review of Supreme Court's order in Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi case next month. "Exercising our constitutional right, we are going to file a review petition in the Babri masjid case during the first week of December," the organisation stated in a tweet. "Exercising our constitutional right, we are going to file a review petition in the #Babrimasjidcase during the first week of December. Sunni Waqf Board's decision not to pursue the case won't legally affect us. All Muslim organizations are on the same page" @Zafaryab_Jilani: — All India Muslim Personal Law Board (@AIMPLB_Official) November 27, 2019 × They also said that the Sunni Waqf Board's decision not to pursue the case will not affect them legally. "All Muslim organisations are on the same page," it added. The Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board had yesterday said it would not file a review petition against the apex court's verdict in the case but was yet to take a call on whether to accept a five-acre alternative plot for a mosque. "There was no discussion about the land which will be offered by the government. When the land will be offered, then a meeting of the board will commence about it," Abdul Razzaq Khan, member Sunni Waqf Board, had said. Earlier this month, a five-judge Supreme Court bench led by then-CJI Ranjan Gogoi unanimously ruled in favour of Ram Lalla and said the entire disputed land spread over 2.7 acres will be handed over to a trust formed by the government, which will monitor the construction of a Ram temple at the site. The top court also added that an alternative five acres of land at a prominent location in Ayodhya should be allotted for the construction of a mosque following consultation between the Centre and the state government.

Ayodhya judgement: All India Muslim Personal Law Board to file review petition

All-India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) is scheduled to hold a meeting at 10 am on Sunday in Lucknow to discuss if the board will file a review petition regarding the apex court verdict on Ayodhya. 
 
Speaking to ANI, Maulana Sufian said, "Some of the groups have welcomed the Supreme Court's verdict. But we AIMPLB will hold a meeting at 10 am today to decide whether to review for the petition or not".

The cleric also informed ANI that a press conference will be held by the board at 3:30 pm to brief the media about the final decision. 
 
The Supreme Court on Saturday directed the Central government to hand over the disputed site at Ayodhya for the construction of a temple and set up a trust for the same. 
 
The apex court further directed the government to give a suitable plot of land measuring five acres to the Sunni Waqf Board. 
 
A five-judge constitution bench presided by Chief Justice Gogoi and comprising Justices SA Bobde, DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer passed the order on a batch of petitions against an order of the Allahabad High Court which trifurcated the site between the parties, Ramlalla Virajman, Sunni Central Waqf Board and Nirmohi Akhara. 
 
A decade-long legal dispute was fought by Hindu Mahasabha, a sect of Hindu monks Nirmohi Akhara and Sunni Waqf Board over 2.77 acres of land in Ayodhya.

&nbsp;

All-India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) is scheduled to hold a meeting at 10 am on Sunday in Lucknow to discuss if the board will file a review petition regarding the apex court verdict on Ayodhya.

All-India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) is scheduled to hold a meeting at 10 am on Sunday in Lucknow to discuss if the board will file a review petition regarding the apex court verdict on Ayodhya. Speaking to ANI, Maulana Sufian said, "Some of the groups have welcomed the Supreme Court's verdict. But we AIMPLB will hold a meeting at 10 am today to decide whether to review for the petition or not". The cleric also informed ANI that a press conference will be held by the board at 3:30 pm to brief the media about the final decision. The Supreme Court on Saturday directed the Central government to hand over the disputed site at Ayodhya for the construction of a temple and set up a trust for the same. The apex court further directed the government to give a suitable plot of land measuring five acres to the Sunni Waqf Board. A five-judge constitution bench presided by Chief Justice Gogoi and comprising Justices SA Bobde, DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer passed the order on a batch of petitions against an order of the Allahabad High Court which trifurcated the site between the parties, Ramlalla Virajman, Sunni Central Waqf Board and Nirmohi Akhara. A decade-long legal dispute was fought by Hindu Mahasabha, a sect of Hindu monks Nirmohi Akhara and Sunni Waqf Board over 2.77 acres of land in Ayodhya.

Ayodhya verdict: Muslim Law Board to meet shortly, might file review petition

The Supreme Court on Tuesday stated that it would hear the review petitions against its Sabarimala verdict on January 22, adding that it will be an open&nbsp;court hearing. The apex court refused to stay its earlier verdict in the case.

The <a href="http://www.wionews.com/india-news/sabarimala-case-supreme-court-to-take-up-review-petitions-at-3-pm-today-177005">top court on Tuesday made it clear</a> that fresh pleas, relating to the Sabarimala Temple, will be heard only after it decides the earlier petitions seeking review of the judgement allowing entry of women of all age groups into the shrine in Kerala.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SabarimalaTemple?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#SabarimalaTemple</a> Case: Supreme Court orders open court hearing in all the 49 review petitions.
— ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1062288751278387201?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 13, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

"Writ petitions will be heard after the orders in the review petitions," the bench, comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justices S K Kaul and K M Joseph said while hearing the three fresh petitions filed by G Vijaya Kumar, S Jaya Rajkumar and Shailaja Vijayan challenging its September 28 verdict.

On September 28, the Supreme Court of India pronounced its verdict allowing the entry of women of all ages into the Sabarimala Temple.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
Supreme Court has admitted the review petitions and said all the review petitions to be heard on January 22 in the open court: Advocate Mathew Nedumpara. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SabarimalaTemple?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#SabarimalaTemple</a> case <a href="https://t.co/HFuwB5dqNz">pic.twitter.com/HFuwB5dqNz</a>
— ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1062298999808552960?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 13, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

A five-judge constitution bench headed by then Chief Justice Dipak Misra, said the ban amounted to gender discrimination.&nbsp;

The Supreme Court on Tuesday stated that it would hear the review petitions against its Sabarimala verdict on January 22, adding that it will be an open court hearing.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday stated that it would hear the review petitions against its Sabarimala verdict on January 22, adding that it will be an open court hearing. The apex court refused to stay its earlier verdict in the case. The top court on Tuesday made it clear that fresh pleas, relating to the Sabarimala Temple, will be heard only after it decides the earlier petitions seeking review of the judgement allowing entry of women of all age groups into the shrine in Kerala. #SabarimalaTemple Case: Supreme Court orders open court hearing in all the 49 review petitions. — ANI (@ANI) November 13, 2018 × "Writ petitions will be heard after the orders in the review petitions," the bench, comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justices S K Kaul and K M Joseph said while hearing the three fresh petitions filed by G Vijaya Kumar, S Jaya Rajkumar and Shailaja Vijayan challenging its September 28 verdict. On September 28, the Supreme Court of India pronounced its verdict allowing the entry of women of all ages into the Sabarimala Temple. Supreme Court has admitted the review petitions and said all the review petitions to be heard on January 22 in the open court: Advocate Mathew Nedumpara. #SabarimalaTemple case pic.twitter.com/HFuwB5dqNz — ANI (@ANI) November 13, 2018 × A five-judge constitution bench headed by then Chief Justice Dipak Misra, said the ban amounted to gender discrimination.

Sabarimala: SC to hear review petitions on January 22, refuses to stay earlier verdict

<a href="http://cmsuat.wionews.com/india-news/government-to-file-scst-review-petition-today-127736">Government to file SC/ST review petition today</a>

Union Minister of Law Ravi Shankar Prasad took to his Twitter account on Sunday to inform that the Union Government on Monday will file a review petition against the Supreme Court judgment regarding the legal clause of immediate arrest and registration of alleged cases under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989.

<a href="http://cmsuat.wionews.com/world/tiangong-1-space-lab-broke-up-over-south-pacific-china-127731">Tiangong-1 space lab broke up over South Pacific: China</a>

China said today its space lab named Tiangong-1 broke up into pieces as it headed towards Earth in the South Pacific. The eight-tonne Tiangong-1 "mostly" burnt up above the vast ocean's central region at 8:15 am (0015 GMT), China's Manned Space Engineering Office said.

<a href="http://cmsuat.wionews.com/india-news/india-replaces-vietnam-to-become-second-largest-mobile-phone-producer-after-china--127743">India replaces Vietnam to become second largest mobile phone producer after China</a>

India's mobile phone users have been increasing by the day, various reports suggest the same and now, another study points at the fact that Indian mobile manufacturing industry is leaving no stone unturned to meet the ever-expanding demand.

<a href="http://cmsuat.wionews.com/india-news/bodies-of-38-indians-killed-in-iraq-to-be-brought-back-to-india-today-127739">Bodies of 38 Indians killed in Iraq to be brought back to India today</a>

The mortal remains of 38 out of 39 Indians, who were killed by the Islamic State in Iraq, are due to reach India late today. Minister of State for External Affairs VK Singh, who is overseeing the entire process of bringing back the bodies, left for Mosul on Sunday. He said that one man's remains would not be brought as his case was still pending.

<a href="http://cmsuat.wionews.com/world/cameron-diaz-calls-it-quits-confirms-retirement-127727">Cameron Diaz calls it quits, confirms retirement</a>

Prominent Hollywood actress Cameron Diaz has made an announcement lately that she has retired from acting, thus putting an end to her cinematic career. Diaz last appeared in the 2014 remake of musical 'Annie,' in which she starred alongside Jamie Foxx

Government to file SC/ST review petition today Union Minister of Law Ravi Shankar Prasad took to his Twitter account on Sunday to inform that the Union Government on Monday will file a review petition against the Supreme Court judgment regarding the legal clause of immediate arrest and registration of alleged cases under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989. Tiangong-1 space lab broke up over South Pacific: China China said today its space lab named Tiangong-1 broke up into pieces as it headed towards Earth in the South Pacific. The eight-tonne Tiangong-1 "mostly" burnt up above the vast ocean's central region at 8:15 am (0015 GMT), China's Manned Space Engineering Office said. India replaces Vietnam to become second largest mobile phone producer after China India's mobile phone users have been increasing by the day, various reports suggest the same and now, another study points at the fact that Indian mobile manufacturing industry is leaving no stone unturned to meet the ever-expanding demand. Bodies of 38 Indians killed in Iraq to be brought back to India today The mortal remains of 38 out of 39 Indians, who were killed by the Islamic State in Iraq, are due to reach India late today. Minister of State for External Affairs VK Singh, who is overseeing the entire process of bringing back the bodies, left for Mosul on Sunday. He said that one man's remains would not be brought as his case was still pending. Cameron Diaz calls it quits, confirms retirement Prominent Hollywood actress Cameron Diaz has made an announcement lately that she has retired from acting, thus putting an end to her cinematic career. Diaz last appeared in the 2014 remake of musical 'Annie,' in which she starred alongside Jamie Foxx

News brief: Big stories of the day

Union Minister Ram Vilas Paswan questioned the all-India bandh against the Supreme Court's ruling on the SC/ST Act yesterday. The minister reasoned that there was no point in observing the bandh when the central government is going to file a review petition anyway.

"What is the point of organising a Bharat Bandh? The government is positively going to file the review petition," Paswan noted.

Dalit organisations called for a nationwide Bandh today protesting the Supreme Court's ruling on Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989.

The apex court, in its recent order, had introduced the provision of anticipatory bail in the Act, declaring that no automatic arrest will be made on any complaint filed under the law.

The Centre will file a review petition in the Supreme Court today challenging the ruling.&nbsp

(With inputs from agencies)&nbsp

Dalit organisations have called for a nationwide Bandh today protesting the Supreme Court's ruling on Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989

Union Minister Ram Vilas Paswan questioned the all-India bandh against the Supreme Court's ruling on the SC/ST Act yesterday. The minister reasoned that there was no point in observing the bandh when the central government is going to file a review petition anyway. "What is the point of organising a Bharat Bandh? The government is positively going to file the review petition," Paswan noted. Dalit organisations called for a nationwide Bandh today protesting the Supreme Court's ruling on Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989. The apex court, in its recent order, had introduced the provision of anticipatory bail in the Act, declaring that no automatic arrest will be made on any complaint filed under the law. The Centre will file a review petition in the Supreme Court today challenging the ruling. (With inputs from agencies)

No point of Bharat Bandh, Centre will file review petition: Ram Vilas Paswan

review-petition

Review Petition, News on Review Petition, stories on Review Petition, articles on Review Petition, Review Petition stories at Wion, Review Petition news, Review Petition latest news