Prince Harry will seek to appeal a UK court ruling Wednesday that the government acted lawfully when it downgraded the level of his personal security when he visits Britain.

The youngest son of King Charles III launched the legal action after the British government told him in February 2020 that he would no longer be given the "same degree" of publicly-funded protection when in the UK.

Harry, the Duke of Sussex, sensationally relocated to North America in 2020 with his wife Meghan, eventually settling in California in the United States, and is no longer classified as a working royal.

High Court judge Peter Lane said in a 52-page judgment that the "bespoke process" devised for him by a committee which is under the remit of the interior ministry "was, and is, legally sound".

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/lifestyle/news-prince-harry-loses-case-against-uk-govt-over-security-694775">Prince Harry loses case against UK govt over personal security cover downgrade</a> 
 
But a legal spokesman for Harry said he will try to turn to the Court of Appeal "to obtain justice". The court -- England's second highest -- must decide whether there are grounds to hear the case.

"The duke is not asking for preferential treatment, but for a fair and lawful application of... (the) rules, ensuring that he receives the same consideration as others," Harry's spokesman added.&nbsp;

The interior ministry said it was "pleased" with the judgment and was "carefully considering" its next steps.

"The UK government's protective security system is rigorous and proportionate," a ministry spokesperson added.

- 'Harm's way' - 
 
The prince told a hearing at London's High Court in December that security concerns were preventing visits back to Britain. 
 
"The UK is my home. The UK is central to the heritage of my children," he said in a written statement read out by his lawyers. &nbsp;

"That cannot happen if it's not possible to keep them safe.

"I cannot put my wife in danger like that and, given my experiences in life, I am reluctant to unnecessarily put myself in harm's way too."

Harry's mother Princess Diana was killed in a high-speed car crash in Paris in 1997 as she tried to escape paparazzi photographers.

However, lawyers for the government rejected claims that he was "singled out" and treated "less favourably" or that a proper risk analysis was not carried out.

In May last year, a judge also sided with the government over its refusal to let him pay for specialist British police protection himself.

The interior ministry argued then that it was "not appropriate" for wealthy people to "buy" protective security when it had decided that it was not in 
the public interest for such taxpayer-funded protection.

London's Metropolitan Police also opposed Harry's offer on the grounds that it would be wrong to "place officers in harm's way upon payment of a fee by a private individual".

- NY car chase - 
 
The latest ruling also revealed new details about a New York car chase last May involving paparazzi that Harry and Meghan described as "near catastrophic".

The New York Police Department (NYPD), the city's mayor and a taxi driver who briefly transported the couple all subsequently downplayed the danger and duration of the pursuit.

However, a December 2023 internal NYPD letter from its intelligence chief disclosed to the High Court said a thorough review of the incident had concluded "that the behaviour in question was reckless".&nbsp;

Lane's ruling said, "the investigation had found reckless disregard of vehicle and traffic laws and persistently dangerous and unacceptable behaviour on the part of paparazzi during the night in question".

It also noted that "there was sufficient evidence to arrest two individuals for reckless endangerment".

The legal action over his personal security is one of the various lawsuits Harry has pursued in recent years in Britain, primarily concerned with alleged phone hacking by newspapers.

Earlier this month, he settled a long-running legal claim against Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN).

The prince is also bringing legal action against the publisher of the Daily Mail, while he and actor Hugh Grant are also suing News GroupNewspapers (NGN), part of Rupert Murdoch's global media empire.

Prince Harry will seek to appeal a UK court ruling Wednesday that the government acted lawfully when it downgraded the level of his personal security when he visits Britain.

Prince Harry will seek to appeal a UK court ruling Wednesday that the government acted lawfully when it downgraded the level of his personal security when he visits Britain. The youngest son of King Charles III launched the legal action after the British government told him in February 2020 that he would no longer be given the "same degree" of publicly-funded protection when in the UK. Harry, the Duke of Sussex, sensationally relocated to North America in 2020 with his wife Meghan, eventually settling in California in the United States, and is no longer classified as a working royal. High Court judge Peter Lane said in a 52-page judgment that the "bespoke process" devised for him by a committee which is under the remit of the interior ministry "was, and is, legally sound". Prince Harry loses case against UK govt over personal security cover downgrade But a legal spokesman for Harry said he will try to turn to the Court of Appeal "to obtain justice". The court -- England's second highest -- must decide whether there are grounds to hear the case. "The duke is not asking for preferential treatment, but for a fair and lawful application of... (the) rules, ensuring that he receives the same consideration as others," Harry's spokesman added. The interior ministry said it was "pleased" with the judgment and was "carefully considering" its next steps. "The UK government's protective security system is rigorous and proportionate," a ministry spokesperson added. - 'Harm's way' - The prince told a hearing at London's High Court in December that security concerns were preventing visits back to Britain. "The UK is my home. The UK is central to the heritage of my children," he said in a written statement read out by his lawyers. "That cannot happen if it's not possible to keep them safe. "I cannot put my wife in danger like that and, given my experiences in life, I am reluctant to unnecessarily put myself in harm's way too." Harry's mother Princess Diana was killed in a high-speed car crash in Paris in 1997 as she tried to escape paparazzi photographers. However, lawyers for the government rejected claims that he was "singled out" and treated "less favourably" or that a proper risk analysis was not carried out. In May last year, a judge also sided with the government over its refusal to let him pay for specialist British police protection himself. The interior ministry argued then that it was "not appropriate" for wealthy people to "buy" protective security when it had decided that it was not in the public interest for such taxpayer-funded protection. London's Metropolitan Police also opposed Harry's offer on the grounds that it would be wrong to "place officers in harm's way upon payment of a fee by a private individual". - NY car chase - The latest ruling also revealed new details about a New York car chase last May involving paparazzi that Harry and Meghan described as "near catastrophic". The New York Police Department (NYPD), the city's mayor and a taxi driver who briefly transported the couple all subsequently downplayed the danger and duration of the pursuit. However, a December 2023 internal NYPD letter from its intelligence chief disclosed to the High Court said a thorough review of the incident had concluded "that the behaviour in question was reckless". Lane's ruling said, "the investigation had found reckless disregard of vehicle and traffic laws and persistently dangerous and unacceptable behaviour on the part of paparazzi during the night in question". It also noted that "there was sufficient evidence to arrest two individuals for reckless endangerment". The legal action over his personal security is one of the various lawsuits Harry has pursued in recent years in Britain, primarily concerned with alleged phone hacking by newspapers. Earlier this month, he settled a long-running legal claim against Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN). The prince is also bringing legal action against the publisher of the Daily Mail, while he and actor Hugh Grant are also suing News GroupNewspapers (NGN), part of Rupert Murdoch's global media empire.

Prince Harry to seek appeal after losing court challenge over security

Prince Harry lost a court challenge against the UK government on Wednesday over a decision to change the level of his personal security when he visits the country.

Harry launched legal action against the government after being told in February 2020 that he would no longer be given the "same degree" of publicly-funded protection when in Britain. 
 
"The 'bespoke' process devised for the claimant in the decision of 28 February 2020 was, and is, legally sound," High Court judge Peter Lane said in his 52-page judgment.&nbsp; 
 
Much of the legal proceedings, which covered security arrangements for senior figures, were held in private in December 2023, reports the BBC. The ruling was issued by retired High Court judge Sir Peter Lane on Wednesday morning.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/lifestyle/news-prince-harry-meghan-markle-slammed-for-using-royal-titles-on-new-website-690358">Prince Harry, Meghan Markle slammed for using royal titles on new website</a> 
 
The ruling is likely to impact Harry's future visits to the UK, as he previously argued that the lower level of security has made it difficult to bring his family to the country. 
 
The news comes amid Harry's father, King Charles III's cancer treatment. Earlier this month, as the King was diagnosed with cancer, Harry rushed to the UK to meet his father and stayed in the country for a day before heading back to his family. Rumours are rife that Harry may now visit the UK with his wife and children soon to meet the monarch.&nbsp;

Also read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/lifestyle/news-prince-harry-to-visit-uk-with-lilibet-and-archie-amid-king-charles-cancer-diagnosis-report-691414">&nbsp;Prince Harry to visit UK with Lilibet and Archie amid King Charles’ cancer diagnosis: Report</a> 
 
In the ruling, Sir Peter rejected the Duke's case, finding that there had not been any unlawfulness in deciding to downgrade Prince Harry's security status and that any departure from policy was justified.

(With agency inputs)

Prince Harry lost a court challenge against the UK government on Wednesday over a decision to change the level of his personal security when he visits the country.

Prince Harry lost a court challenge against the UK government on Wednesday over a decision to change the level of his personal security when he visits the country. Harry launched legal action against the government after being told in February 2020 that he would no longer be given the "same degree" of publicly-funded protection when in Britain. "The 'bespoke' process devised for the claimant in the decision of 28 February 2020 was, and is, legally sound," High Court judge Peter Lane said in his 52-page judgment. Much of the legal proceedings, which covered security arrangements for senior figures, were held in private in December 2023, reports the BBC. The ruling was issued by retired High Court judge Sir Peter Lane on Wednesday morning. Prince Harry, Meghan Markle slammed for using royal titles on new website The ruling is likely to impact Harry's future visits to the UK, as he previously argued that the lower level of security has made it difficult to bring his family to the country. The news comes amid Harry's father, King Charles III's cancer treatment. Earlier this month, as the King was diagnosed with cancer, Harry rushed to the UK to meet his father and stayed in the country for a day before heading back to his family. Rumours are rife that Harry may now visit the UK with his wife and children soon to meet the monarch. Also read: Prince Harry to visit UK with Lilibet and Archie amid King Charles’ cancer diagnosis: Report In the ruling, Sir Peter rejected the Duke's case, finding that there had not been any unlawfulness in deciding to downgrade Prince Harry's security status and that any departure from policy was justified. (With agency inputs)

Prince Harry loses case against UK govt over personal security cover downgrade

prince-harry-loses-case-against-uk-government

Prince Harry Loses Case Against Uk Government, News on Prince Harry Loses Case Against Uk Government, stories on Prince Harry Loses Case Against Uk Government, articles on Prince Harry Loses Case Against Uk Government, Prince Harry Loses Case Against Uk Government stories at Wion, Prince Harry Loses Case Against Uk Government news, Prince Harry Loses Case Against Uk Government latest news

prince harry-loses-case-against-uk-government

Prince Harry to seek appeal after losing court challenge over security

Prince Harry loses case against UK govt over personal security cover downgrade