Canadian news industry groups have raised concerns over meta platforms' recent decision to block news content on its platforms within the country. This action, taken in response to an upcoming law that mandates tech companies to pay for news articles, has prompted canadian news organizations to accuse meta of exploiting its dominant position and hindering fair competition.

Meta to block news content across platforms in Canada

<p>Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta platforms—the parent company of Facebook and Instagram—has threatened to pull down news content from its social media apps in California in protest against the state’s new proposed bill that requires big tech companies to pay news outlets for showcasing their content.</p>

<p>The Journalism Preservation Act requires digital companies such as Google and Facebook to pay local news publishers a “journalism usage fee” whenever their news content is used or posted on those platforms.</p>

<p>The bill, which is sponsored by a Democrat&nbsp;assembly member from Oakland, Buffy Wicks, also requires news publishers to invest 70 per cent of usage fee profits into journalism jobs.</p>

<p>The move was slammed by Meta’s communications director Andy Stone who called the bill “a slush fund that primarily benefits big, out-of-state media companies under the guise of aiding California publishers.”</p>

<p>“The bill fails to recognise that publishers and broadcasters put their content on our platform themselves and that substantial consolidation in California’s local news industry came over 15 years ago, well before Facebook was widely used,” Stone said on Twitter on Wednesday.</p>

<p>"If the Journalism Preservation Act passes, we will be forced to remove news from Facebook and Instagram, rather than pay into a slush fund that primarily benefits big, out-of-state media companies under the guise of aiding California publishers," he added.</p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Meta statement on the California Journalism Preservation Act. <a href="https://t.co/ssgk1vSryB">pic.twitter.com/ssgk1vSryB</a></p>
— Andy Stone (@andymstone) <a href="https://twitter.com/andymstone/status/1663951770052067338?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 31, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<h2><strong>Lawmaker condemns Meta’s threat</strong></h2>

<p>Responding to the remarks, Wicks in a statement condemned Meta for using a “scare tactic” in an attempt to “silence journalists”.</p>

<p>“This threat from Meta is a scare tactic that they’ve tried to deploy, unsuccessfully, in every country that’s attempted this,” Wicks said in a statement, according to CNN.</p>

<p>“It’s egregious that one of the wealthiest companies in the world would rather silence journalists than face regulation.”</p>

<p>A spokesperson for Wicks said that the bill is due for a vote in the California State Assembly on Thursday.</p>

<h2><strong>Evokes mixed response </strong></h2>

<p>The bill has garnered mixed responses among the media fraternity in California.</p>

<p>While the Media Guild of the West and Pacific Media Workers Guild have praised the bill, Free Press Action, a non-profit media advocacy organisation, has criticised it.</p>

<p>In a joint letter, the two unions called Meta and Google “powerful landlords overseeing an ever-expanding slum of low-quality information, happy to collect advertising rents from struggling tenants while avoiding paying for upkeep".</p>

<p><a name="_Hlk136524370">The Free Press Action, on the other hand, </a>said the proposed bill does “nothing to support trustworthy local reporting and would instead pad the profits of massive conglomerates".</p>

<p><em>(With inputs from agencies)</em></p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>


Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta platforms—the parent company of Facebook and Instagram—has threatened to pull down news content from its social media apps in California in protest against the state’s new proposed bill that requires big tech companies to pay news outlets for showcasing their content.

Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta platforms—the parent company of Facebook and Instagram—has threatened to pull down news content from its social media apps in California in protest against the state’s new proposed bill that requires big tech companies to pay news outlets for showcasing their content. The Journalism Preservation Act requires digital companies such as Google and Facebook to pay local news publishers a “journalism usage fee” whenever their news content is used or posted on those platforms. The bill, which is sponsored by a Democrat assembly member from Oakland, Buffy Wicks, also requires news publishers to invest 70 per cent of usage fee profits into journalism jobs. The move was slammed by Meta’s communications director Andy Stone who called the bill “a slush fund that primarily benefits big, out-of-state media companies under the guise of aiding California publishers.” “The bill fails to recognise that publishers and broadcasters put their content on our platform themselves and that substantial consolidation in California’s local news industry came over 15 years ago, well before Facebook was widely used,” Stone said on Twitter on Wednesday. "If the Journalism Preservation Act passes, we will be forced to remove news from Facebook and Instagram, rather than pay into a slush fund that primarily benefits big, out-of-state media companies under the guise of aiding California publishers," he added. Meta statement on the California Journalism Preservation Act. pic.twitter.com/ssgk1vSryB — Andy Stone (@andymstone) May 31, 2023 × Lawmaker condemns Meta’s threat Responding to the remarks, Wicks in a statement condemned Meta for using a “scare tactic” in an attempt to “silence journalists”. “This threat from Meta is a scare tactic that they’ve tried to deploy, unsuccessfully, in every country that’s attempted this,” Wicks said in a statement, according to CNN. “It’s egregious that one of the wealthiest companies in the world would rather silence journalists than face regulation.” A spokesperson for Wicks said that the bill is due for a vote in the California State Assembly on Thursday. Evokes mixed response The bill has garnered mixed responses among the media fraternity in California. While the Media Guild of the West and Pacific Media Workers Guild have praised the bill, Free Press Action, a non-profit media advocacy organisation, has criticised it. In a joint letter, the two unions called Meta and Google “powerful landlords overseeing an ever-expanding slum of low-quality information, happy to collect advertising rents from struggling tenants while avoiding paying for upkeep". The Free Press Action, on the other hand, said the proposed bill does “nothing to support trustworthy local reporting and would instead pad the profits of massive conglomerates". (With inputs from agencies) WATCH WION LIVE HERE

Meta threatens to pull news content from social media sites over California's proposed bill

Tech Giants have always siphoned news content from traditional media. The Australian government has now decided to make them pay for news. Should India follow Australia's lead?

Gravitas: Google & Facebook asked to pay for news

news-content

News Content, News on News Content, stories on News Content, articles on News Content, News Content stories at Wion, News Content news, News Content latest news