A startling study by The Mozilla Foundation, an internet privacy watchdog has exposed the invasive data collection practices of car manufacturers Nissan and Kia.

These companies have been found to collect sensitive personal information, including details about drivers' "sexual activity" and "sex lives," reported the New York Post.&nbsp;

The data collected could potentially be sold to third-party advertisers, raising concerns about privacy and consent.

The study, conducted&nbsp;has shed light on the alarming extent to which car companies gather personal information from drivers who connect their smartphones to their vehicles.&nbsp;

<h2>Widespread data harvesting</h2>

The study by The Mozilla Foundation reveals that most car companies have the ability to access various sources to obtain personal information about drivers through the connected services of their vehicles.

This data is collected through an intricate web of sensors, microphones, cameras, smartphone apps, and connected services used within the vehicle.

Also read |<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/car-thefts-soar-19-in-nyc-cops-blame-tiktok-challenge-633275">&nbsp;Car thefts soar 19% in New York City; cops blame TikTok challenge</a>

<h2>Data sale to third parties</h2>

Once this data is obtained, car manufacturers may choose to sell or share it with vendors, insurance companies, and other entities. This practice has raised significant concerns regarding the transparency and consent mechanisms surrounding the collection and distribution of such sensitive information.

Kevin Zawacki, a spokesperson for The Mozilla Foundation, expressed concerns about the ambiguity surrounding data collection practices. He noted that it is extremely challenging for consumers to fully understand how their data is being collected and used.

The foundation attempted to seek clarification from Nissan regarding its data collection methods but received no response, further highlighting the lack of transparency in the industry.

<h2>Nissan's alarming privacy policy</h2>

Among the 25 car brands assessed in the study, Nissan's privacy policy stood out as particularly concerning. The foundation described it as "mind-boggling creepy" and criticised Nissan for openly stating its capability to collect and share sensitive personal information, including data related to "sexual activity," "health diagnosis," and "genetic information" for targeted marketing purposes.

Nissan's official privacy policy lists an extensive range of sensitive personal information that it collects from drivers, including details related to race, religion, sexual orientation, and health.

Also watch |&nbsp;Foxconn backs 'make in India'

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/foxconn-backs-make-in-india-633231/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2>Kia's data collection acknowledgment</h2>

Kia, another major automaker, also admits to collecting "sensitive personal information" in its privacy policy, as per the New York Post.&nbsp;This includes data related to "racial or ethnic origin," "religious or philosophical beliefs," "health," "sex life or sexual orientation," and "genetic data." However, Kia stated that not all types of personal information are collected, and the extent of data collection depends on the context of the consumer's interaction with the company.

The Mozilla Foundation's study also raised concerns about other car manufacturers, including Chrysler, Chevrolet, Toyota, Audi, Jeep, and Honda. These companies were accused of collecting deeply personal information from the moment drivers enter their vehicles.

&nbsp;

WATCH WION LIVE HERE:

<iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe>

A startling study by The Mozilla Foundation, an internet privacy watchdog has exposed the invasive data collection practices of car manufacturers Nissan and Kia.

A startling study by The Mozilla Foundation, an internet privacy watchdog has exposed the invasive data collection practices of car manufacturers Nissan and Kia. These companies have been found to collect sensitive personal information, including details about drivers' "sexual activity" and "sex lives," reported the New York Post. The data collected could potentially be sold to third-party advertisers, raising concerns about privacy and consent. The study, conducted has shed light on the alarming extent to which car companies gather personal information from drivers who connect their smartphones to their vehicles. Widespread data harvesting The study by The Mozilla Foundation reveals that most car companies have the ability to access various sources to obtain personal information about drivers through the connected services of their vehicles. This data is collected through an intricate web of sensors, microphones, cameras, smartphone apps, and connected services used within the vehicle. Also read | Car thefts soar 19% in New York City; cops blame TikTok challenge Data sale to third parties Once this data is obtained, car manufacturers may choose to sell or share it with vendors, insurance companies, and other entities. This practice has raised significant concerns regarding the transparency and consent mechanisms surrounding the collection and distribution of such sensitive information. Kevin Zawacki, a spokesperson for The Mozilla Foundation, expressed concerns about the ambiguity surrounding data collection practices. He noted that it is extremely challenging for consumers to fully understand how their data is being collected and used. The foundation attempted to seek clarification from Nissan regarding its data collection methods but received no response, further highlighting the lack of transparency in the industry. Nissan's alarming privacy policy Among the 25 car brands assessed in the study, Nissan's privacy policy stood out as particularly concerning. The foundation described it as "mind-boggling creepy" and criticised Nissan for openly stating its capability to collect and share sensitive personal information, including data related to "sexual activity," "health diagnosis," and "genetic information" for targeted marketing purposes. Nissan's official privacy policy lists an extensive range of sensitive personal information that it collects from drivers, including details related to race, religion, sexual orientation, and health. Also watch | Foxconn backs 'make in India' Kia's data collection acknowledgment Kia, another major automaker, also admits to collecting "sensitive personal information" in its privacy policy, as per the New York Post. This includes data related to "racial or ethnic origin," "religious or philosophical beliefs," "health," "sex life or sexual orientation," and "genetic data." However, Kia stated that not all types of personal information are collected, and the extent of data collection depends on the context of the consumer's interaction with the company. The Mozilla Foundation's study also raised concerns about other car manufacturers, including Chrysler, Chevrolet, Toyota, Audi, Jeep, and Honda. These companies were accused of collecting deeply personal information from the moment drivers enter their vehicles. WATCH WION LIVE HERE:

Can your car monitor your 'sex life'? Startling report suggests so

Albania has detained two Russian and one Ukrainian national who allegedly tried to enter a military facility. The Albanian defence ministry stated that the two of its soldiers have been slightly injured.

2 Albanian soldiers injured while detaining 24-year-old Russian man

A Chinese warplane entered Taiwan's air defence identification zone (ADIZ) on Wednesday, marking the fourth such intrusion this month. In response, Taiwan sent aircraft, broadcast radio warnings, and had air defence missile systems track the PLAAF aircraft.

Chinese warplane enters Taiwan's air defence identification zone, 4th incursion this month

In order to deal with the <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/security-forces-cleared-to-shoot-down-drones-flying-at-1000-feet-amid-sightings-across-border-255690">intrusion of drones from the Pakistani side</a>, the Border Security Force (BSF) is all set to purchase a ground-based anti-drone system. 
 
The system will have jammers, sensors,&nbsp;and&nbsp;a 360-degree surveillance system. 
 
There has almost been intrusion every day by drones sent by Pakistan to India. These drones are being used to transport arms and ammunition to the country. 
 
According to a document, the anti-drone system will also have a radio frequency receiver, electro-optic sensor, jammer, system controller, etc. 
 
The system is expected to be installed by the end of this year. A tender has been floated regarding the purchase. 
 
According to BSF, its radar will have 360-degree surveillance capability with high direction accuracy. 
 
For surveillance, the system will have cameras. Also, its jammer will be so effective that they can jam signals in less than five seconds. 
 
"The system will be compact and easily deployable which can be installed in just 10 minutes with ease of dismantling as per ground," a document reads. 
 
The system will be able to work day and night and will be <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/bsf-spots-drone-along-india-pakistan-border-254531">able to detect multiple drones at a time</a>.

In order to deal with the intrusion of drones from the Pakistani side, the Border Security Force (BSF) is all set to purchase a ground-based anti-drone system. The system will have jammers, sensors, and a 360-degree surveillance system.

In order to deal with the intrusion of drones from the Pakistani side, the Border Security Force (BSF) is all set to purchase a ground-based anti-drone system. The system will have jammers, sensors, and a 360-degree surveillance system. There has almost been intrusion every day by drones sent by Pakistan to India. These drones are being used to transport arms and ammunition to the country. According to a document, the anti-drone system will also have a radio frequency receiver, electro-optic sensor, jammer, system controller, etc. The system is expected to be installed by the end of this year. A tender has been floated regarding the purchase. According to BSF, its radar will have 360-degree surveillance capability with high direction accuracy. For surveillance, the system will have cameras. Also, its jammer will be so effective that they can jam signals in less than five seconds. "The system will be compact and easily deployable which can be installed in just 10 minutes with ease of dismantling as per ground," a document reads. The system will be able to work day and night and will be able to detect multiple drones at a time.

Border Security Force to purchase anti-drone system to deal with intrusion from Pakistan

At least a dozen countries are considering, or have enacted laws restricting online speech, a trend that is alarming policy-makers and others who see the internet as a valuable medium for debate and expression. 
 
Such curbs are called out as a threat to the open internet in a report on internet governance set to be released today at an Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development meeting in Cancun, Mexico. 
 
The report, reviewed by Reuters, warns of dangers for the global internet, including intrusive surveillance, rising cyber-crime and fragmentation, as governments exert control of online content. 
 
It was prepared by the London-based Chatham House think-tank and the Centre for International Governance Innovation, founded by former BlackBerry Ltd co-chief Jim Balsillie. 
 
China and Iran long have restricted online speech. Now limitations are under discussion in countries that have had a more open approach to speech, including Brazil, Malaysia, Pakistan, Bolivia, Kenya and Nigeria. 
 
Advocates said some of the proposals would criminalise conversations online that otherwise would be protected under the countries&#39; constitutions. 
 
Some use broad language to outlaw online postings that &quot;disturb the public order&quot; or &quot;convey false statements&quot; - formulations that could enable crackdowns on political speech, critics said. 
 
&quot;Free expression is one of the foundational elements of the internet,&quot; said Michael Chertoff, former US secretary of Homeland Security and a co-author of the internet governance report. &quot;It shouldn&#39;t be protecting the political interests of the ruling party or something of that sort.&quot; 
 
Turkey and Thailand also have cracked down on online speech, and a number of developing world countries have unplugged social media sites altogether during elections and other sensitive moments. In the US as well, some have called for restrictions on Internet communications. 
 
Speech limitations create business and ethical conflicts for companies like Facebook Inc, Twitter Inc and Alphabet Inc&#39;s Google platforms for debate and political organising. 
 
&quot;This is the next evolution of political suppression,&quot; said Richard Forno, assistant director of University of Maryland, Baltimore County Center for Cybersecurity. &quot;Technology facilitates freedom of expression, and politicians don&#39;t like that.&quot; 
 
Fighting deliquencies 
 
Tanzania and Ethiopia have passed laws restricting online speech. In other countries, including Pakistan, Brazil, Bolivia and Kenya, proposals are under discussion or under legislative consideration, according to a review of laws by Reuters and reports by Internet activist groups. 
 
In Bolivia, President Evo Morales earlier this year said that the country needs to &quot;regulate the social networks.&quot; A bill has been drafted and is ready for introduction in the legislature, said Leonardo Loza, head of one of Bolivia&#39;s coca growers&#39; unions, a supporter of the proposal. 
 
&quot;It is aimed at educating and disciplining people, particularly young Bolivians, and fighting delinquency on social networks,&quot; Loza said. &quot;Freedom of expression can&#39;t be lying to the people or insulting citizens and politicians.&quot; 
 
A bill in Pakistan would allow the government to block internet content to protect the &quot;integrity, security or defense&quot; of the state. The legislation, which has passed a vote in Pakistan&#39;s lower house of Parliament, is supposed to target terrorism, but critics said the language is broad. 
 
It comes after Pakistan blocked YouTube in 2012 when a video it deemed inflammatory sparked protests across the country and much of the Muslim world. 
 
Earlier this year, YouTube, which is owned by Google, agreed to launch a local version of its site in the country. But now, the internet report said, the Pakistan Telecommunications Authority can ask the company to remove any material it finds offensive. 
 
Companies in the cross-fire 
 
US internet companies have faced mounting pressure in recent years to restrict content. Companies&#39; terms of service lay out what users can and cannot post, and they said they apply a single standard globally. They aim to comply with local laws, but often confront demands to remove even legal content. 
 
The new laws threaten to raise a whole new set of compliance and enforcement issues. 
 
&quot;There&#39;s a technical question, which is, could you comply if you wanted to, and then the bigger meta question is why would you want to cooperate with this politicised drive to suppress freedom of expression,&quot; said Andrew McLaughlin, Google&#39;s former director of global policy and now leading content organisation at Medium. 
 
Facebook, Twitter and Google declined to comment for this story. 
 
(Reuters)

A dozen countries want to enact laws that criminalise online conversations

At least a dozen countries are considering, or have enacted laws restricting online speech, a trend that is alarming policy-makers and others who see the internet as a valuable medium for debate and expression. Such curbs are called out as a threat to the open internet in a report on internet governance set to be released today at an Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development meeting in Cancun, Mexico. The report, reviewed by Reuters, warns of dangers for the global internet, including intrusive surveillance, rising cyber-crime and fragmentation, as governments exert control of online content. It was prepared by the London-based Chatham House think-tank and the Centre for International Governance Innovation, founded by former BlackBerry Ltd co-chief Jim Balsillie. China and Iran long have restricted online speech. Now limitations are under discussion in countries that have had a more open approach to speech, including Brazil, Malaysia, Pakistan, Bolivia, Kenya and Nigeria. Advocates said some of the proposals would criminalise conversations online that otherwise would be protected under the countries' constitutions. Some use broad language to outlaw online postings that "disturb the public order" or "convey false statements" - formulations that could enable crackdowns on political speech, critics said. "Free expression is one of the foundational elements of the internet," said Michael Chertoff, former US secretary of Homeland Security and a co-author of the internet governance report. "It shouldn't be protecting the political interests of the ruling party or something of that sort." Turkey and Thailand also have cracked down on online speech, and a number of developing world countries have unplugged social media sites altogether during elections and other sensitive moments. In the US as well, some have called for restrictions on Internet communications. Speech limitations create business and ethical conflicts for companies like Facebook Inc, Twitter Inc and Alphabet Inc's Google platforms for debate and political organising. "This is the next evolution of political suppression," said Richard Forno, assistant director of University of Maryland, Baltimore County Center for Cybersecurity. "Technology facilitates freedom of expression, and politicians don't like that." Fighting deliquencies Tanzania and Ethiopia have passed laws restricting online speech. In other countries, including Pakistan, Brazil, Bolivia and Kenya, proposals are under discussion or under legislative consideration, according to a review of laws by Reuters and reports by Internet activist groups. In Bolivia, President Evo Morales earlier this year said that the country needs to "regulate the social networks." A bill has been drafted and is ready for introduction in the legislature, said Leonardo Loza, head of one of Bolivia's coca growers' unions, a supporter of the proposal. "It is aimed at educating and disciplining people, particularly young Bolivians, and fighting delinquency on social networks," Loza said. "Freedom of expression can't be lying to the people or insulting citizens and politicians." A bill in Pakistan would allow the government to block internet content to protect the "integrity, security or defense" of the state. The legislation, which has passed a vote in Pakistan's lower house of Parliament, is supposed to target terrorism, but critics said the language is broad. It comes after Pakistan blocked YouTube in 2012 when a video it deemed inflammatory sparked protests across the country and much of the Muslim world. Earlier this year, YouTube, which is owned by Google, agreed to launch a local version of its site in the country. But now, the internet report said, the Pakistan Telecommunications Authority can ask the company to remove any material it finds offensive. Companies in the cross-fire US internet companies have faced mounting pressure in recent years to restrict content. Companies' terms of service lay out what users can and cannot post, and they said they apply a single standard globally. They aim to comply with local laws, but often confront demands to remove even legal content. The new laws threaten to raise a whole new set of compliance and enforcement issues. "There's a technical question, which is, could you comply if you wanted to, and then the bigger meta question is why would you want to cooperate with this politicised drive to suppress freedom of expression," said Andrew McLaughlin, Google's former director of global policy and now leading content organisation at Medium. Facebook, Twitter and Google declined to comment for this story. (Reuters)

Curb on online speech threat to open internet, says international report

intrusion

Intrusion, News on Intrusion, stories on Intrusion, articles on Intrusion, Intrusion stories at Wion, Intrusion news, Intrusion latest news