<p>Every year on March 23, India observes "Martyr's Day" or "Shaheed Diwas," in order to pay tribute to the three revolutionaries&nbsp;Bhagat Singh, Shivaram Rajguru, and Sukhdev Thapar, who were hanged by the British. The day has a historical significance as it marks the day they were hanged in 1931 while&nbsp;fighting for India’s independence. India also&nbsp;observes Martyr's Day on January 30 in memory of Mahatma Gandhi.&nbsp;Politicians including the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Droupadi Murmu paid homage to the freedom fighters, and observed a two-minute silence in their memory. Know the&nbsp;history, significance and other details of the day.</p>

<p><strong>History of March 23: </strong></p>

<p>In India, the Shaheed Diwas is observed to pay respect and tribute to freedom fighters Bhagat Singh, Shivaram Rajguru and Sukhdev Thapar, who fought against the British rule. Back in 1931, on this same day, the three freedom fighters were hanged in Lahore jail. The three were sentenced to death in the case of the murder of J P Saunders&nbsp;and attack on the Central Legislative Assembly.</p>

<p><strong>Significance and Importance of Martyr's Day 2023: </strong></p>

<p>The significance of Martyr's Day is to help us understand the value of freedom we have today and the sacrifices our freedom fighters made then for us. This day is a reminder not to take our freedom for granted and always strive to protect it. The day is a symbol of courage, pride and unity for the nation and it helps us to remember the "bravehearts" who laid down their lives for this country. The importance of this day lies&nbsp;in the&nbsp;commemoration of the sacrifices of these three brave men&nbsp;and to make us remember the struggle and sacrifices made by men, women and kids for India to gain independence.</p>

<p><strong>Tributes pour on Twitter:</strong></p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">India will always remember the sacrifice of Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev and Rajguru. These are greats who made an unparalleled contribution to our freedom struggle. <a href="https://t.co/SZeSThDxUW">pic.twitter.com/SZeSThDxUW</a></p>
— Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) <a href="https://twitter.com/narendramodi/status/1638742751779991552?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Remembering the indelible sacrifice of Shaheed Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev &amp; Rajguru on this Martyrs’ Day.<br />
My Pranam to these brave sons of India!<br />
<br />
Jai Hind!<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ShaheedDiwas?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ShaheedDiwas</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/%E0%A4%B6%E0%A4%B9%E0%A5%80%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%A8?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#शहीददिन</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MartyrsDay?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MartyrsDay</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SarvodayaDivas?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#SarvodayaDivas</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BhagatSingh?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BhagatSingh</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Sukhdev?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Sukhdev</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Rajguru?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Rajguru</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Freedom?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Freedom</a> <a href="https://t.co/Jtm6bfzIiX">pic.twitter.com/Jtm6bfzIiX</a></p>
— Devendra Fadnavis (@Dev_Fadnavis) <a href="https://twitter.com/Dev_Fadnavis/status/1638729780043427841?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">On this 36th Cheemeni Martyrs' Day, let us honour the memory of the five communists who were brutally hacked and burned to death by Congress goons. Their ultimate sacrifice continues to inspire generations of communists to fight for a more equal and just world. <a href="https://t.co/GibjMOgMBm">pic.twitter.com/GibjMOgMBm</a></p>
— Pinarayi Vijayan (@pinarayivijayan) <a href="https://twitter.com/pinarayivijayan/status/1638787324325822464?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Remembering the heroes who sacrificed their lives for the nation. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MartyrsDay?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MartyrsDay</a> <a href="https://t.co/REcLRnE25M">pic.twitter.com/REcLRnE25M</a></p>
— Salman Khurshid (@salman7khurshid) <a href="https://twitter.com/salman7khurshid/status/1638713428650102785?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<p><br />
<img alt="RAHUL GANDHI" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="15a01c14-7be6-4ad2-909a-1b9ac9efe8d4" src="//cdn.wionews.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/Screenshot%202023-03-23%20141418.png" /></p>


Every year on March 23, India observes "Martyr's Day" or "Shaheed Diwas," in order to pay tribute to the three revolutionaries Bhagat Singh, Shivaram Rajguru, and Sukhdev Thapar, who were hanged by the British.

Every year on March 23, India observes "Martyr's Day" or "Shaheed Diwas," in order to pay tribute to the three revolutionaries Bhagat Singh, Shivaram Rajguru, and Sukhdev Thapar, who were hanged by the British. The day has a historical significance as it marks the day they were hanged in 1931 while fighting for India’s independence. India also observes Martyr's Day on January 30 in memory of Mahatma Gandhi. Politicians including the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Droupadi Murmu paid homage to the freedom fighters, and observed a two-minute silence in their memory. Know the history, significance and other details of the day. History of March 23: In India, the Shaheed Diwas is observed to pay respect and tribute to freedom fighters Bhagat Singh, Shivaram Rajguru and Sukhdev Thapar, who fought against the British rule. Back in 1931, on this same day, the three freedom fighters were hanged in Lahore jail. The three were sentenced to death in the case of the murder of J P Saunders and attack on the Central Legislative Assembly. Significance and Importance of Martyr's Day 2023: The significance of Martyr's Day is to help us understand the value of freedom we have today and the sacrifices our freedom fighters made then for us. This day is a reminder not to take our freedom for granted and always strive to protect it. The day is a symbol of courage, pride and unity for the nation and it helps us to remember the "bravehearts" who laid down their lives for this country. The importance of this day lies in the commemoration of the sacrifices of these three brave men and to make us remember the struggle and sacrifices made by men, women and kids for India to gain independence. Tributes pour on Twitter: India will always remember the sacrifice of Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev and Rajguru. These are greats who made an unparalleled contribution to our freedom struggle. pic.twitter.com/SZeSThDxUW — Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) March 23, 2023 × Remembering the indelible sacrifice of Shaheed Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev & Rajguru on this Martyrs’ Day. My Pranam to these brave sons of India! Jai Hind!#ShaheedDiwas #शहीददिन #MartyrsDay #SarvodayaDivas #BhagatSingh #Sukhdev #Rajguru #Freedom pic.twitter.com/Jtm6bfzIiX — Devendra Fadnavis (@Dev_Fadnavis) March 23, 2023 × On this 36th Cheemeni Martyrs' Day, let us honour the memory of the five communists who were brutally hacked and burned to death by Congress goons. Their ultimate sacrifice continues to inspire generations of communists to fight for a more equal and just world. pic.twitter.com/GibjMOgMBm — Pinarayi Vijayan (@pinarayivijayan) March 23, 2023 × Remembering the heroes who sacrificed their lives for the nation. #MartyrsDay pic.twitter.com/REcLRnE25M — Salman Khurshid (@salman7khurshid) March 23, 2023 ×

Martyr's Day 2023: History, significance and everything you need to know

<p><meta name="uuid" content="uuidi7ILO8uy02fi" /><meta charset="utf-8" /></p>

<p>I must thank Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson for his elegant mix of American right-wing overconfidence and a magnificent display of historical ignorance. As I heard about his glorification of or apology for British colonial rule in India, some of the things he said did ring somewhat true inside me on something I had intended to write about. However, his lack of perspective&nbsp;compounded by factual inaccuracies stumped me.</p>

<p>Stumping reminds me of cricket, the glorious game given to India by the empire. Social philosopher Ashish Nandy once said cricket is an Indian game accidentally invented by the English. It is now time to elaborate on this metaphor, as the world mourns the demise of Queen Elizabeth II, the occasion that enabled Carlson to say what he said; that the British kind of civiilised India by bequeathing institutions, building churches, and erecting architectural wonders hitherto unseen by the colonial natives.</p>

<p>Let's first get the gross factual inaccuracies out of the way. If southern India's temples and northern India's Mughal and Maratha forts alone are to be taken together, they are comparable, if not surpassing, many aspects of British architecture that India was happy to add to its long history of architectural wonders dating back to the times preceding the industrial revolution and hence special for the extra efforts required (Er, has Mr Carlson heard of the Taj Mahal or the Tanjore temple, perchance?).&nbsp;</p>

<p><strong>Read more:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/shashi-tharoor-loses-cool-as-tucker-carlson-says-britain-civilised-india-515842">&nbsp;Shashi Tharoor 'loses cool' as TV anchor Tucker Carlson says Britain civilised India</a></strong></p>

<p>As for churches, they are beautiful but they are essentially shrines, just like temples and mosques. Delhi's Jama Masjid with its beautiful domes has its own architectural charm.</p>

<p>Now, for the institutions. The East India Company indeed built an army that eventually morphed into the British Indian army that in turn fought in the first and second world wars to help the Empire before finding its own native identity. But that, like many other institutions and practices given to India by the British, were essentially meant to strengthen the Empire and its control over India. In other words, like cricket, the institutional gifts given to India by the United Kingdom were largely accidental or incidental, and for most parts, unintentional.</p>

<p>Here's where I must salute our own skills. Jawaharlal Nehru and Mahatma Gandhi accepted the British idea of self-governance (swaraj) before they arrived conclusively at 'Poorna Swaraj' (independence). To that extent, their idioms of political discourse followed British practices. And in my view and those of many others, they, instead of demolishing the stuff and building a Central Vista in a hurry, simply turned them one by one into something more Indian, more democratic, and more resourceful.</p>

<p>Here, we may be gently reminded of the fact that the 1940s saw India suffer the triple whammy of a world war, the British-induced Bengal famine, and the horrible partition that led to bloody riots. Independent India saved and created precious stuff, and destroying old laws and buildings was not among the priorities.</p>

<p>What the Indian National Congress did in its post-independence avatar of being the ruling party, and not a freedom movement, was to live up to the old saying: When life gives you lemons, make lemonade.</p>

<p>And so, the Viceroy's House became Rashtrapati Bhavan. The British-style monarch's agent was replaced in the same palace by the First Citizen called the President of India. The seat of the Imperial Legislative Council was renamed Sansad Bhavan. The British built railways to take mineral wealth out of India but ended up offering a socio-geographical integration to an ancient land. A beautiful accident, as it were.</p>

<p>The Indian Penal Code, sadly enough with its&nbsp;anti-sedition provisions, remains a grim but useful reminder of the double-edged sword that was imperialism.</p>

<p>Some of the finest churches and colleges in India were built by Christian Jesuits, but it turns out they came from Portugal and France, not Britain. St Francis Xavier opened India's first Jesuit school in Goa in 1543, much before the East India Company set foot in India. It was named St. Paul's College. High-power colleges like the multiple St Xavier's and Loyola chains came much later.</p>

<p>Thomas Babington Macaulay is credited for introducing English education into India under William Bentinck, the Governor-General of India, who also played a vital role in abolishing the practice of Sati (widow burning) in India. While the British do deserve credit for doing away with some horrible practices, it must be remembered that English was introduced as an instrument to promote Western culture, recommended by law council member Macaulay as "useful learning" with an air of "superiority of the Europeans".</p>

<p>Macaulay, circa 1835, would not have imagined that English would one day run a thing he would not have heard of, called the computer, or that the United States, with its freshly-minted independence from British rule, would become a technology superpower. This was another case of lemonade manufactured by India with a British lemon.</p>

<p>Ancient Hindu mathematician Aryabhatta is often credited for inventing the symbol for zero, which is at the heart of binary algebra that runs computers. But that's another story, though not unrelated where colonialism is glorified without substantiation.</p>

<p>You could say the British did do some good things in India, such as incidentally bringing in the Industrial Revolution and modern democratic practices, but they are equally (dis)credited for de-industrialising India's homegrown artisans while practising democracy at home and plunderous imperialism in their colonies.</p>

<p>As a direct beneficiary of both democratic India and the English language, I certainly have a soft corner for some of the things that colonialism did, but enough has been written by solid researchers on both the loot and the use of "rule of law" for authoritarian rule by the British to further their own quest for power.</p>

<p>Some say Indians should not bother about a Fox News anchor. On an impulse, I agree, but on deep thought, somebody who can mislead the average Republican voter in the US needs to be told "Hold my beer". Certainly, someone called Carlson whose name is also that of a famous beer brand.</p>

<p><em><strong>(Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.)</strong></em></p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE:&nbsp;</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>


I must thank Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson for his elegant mix of American right-wing overconfidence and a magnificent display of historical ignorance. As I heard about his glorification of or apology for British colonial rule in India, some of the things he said did ring somewhat true inside me on something I had intended to write about.

I must thank Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson for his elegant mix of American right-wing overconfidence and a magnificent display of historical ignorance. As I heard about his glorification of or apology for British colonial rule in India, some of the things he said did ring somewhat true inside me on something I had intended to write about. However, his lack of perspective compounded by factual inaccuracies stumped me. Stumping reminds me of cricket, the glorious game given to India by the empire. Social philosopher Ashish Nandy once said cricket is an Indian game accidentally invented by the English. It is now time to elaborate on this metaphor, as the world mourns the demise of Queen Elizabeth II, the occasion that enabled Carlson to say what he said; that the British kind of civiilised India by bequeathing institutions, building churches, and erecting architectural wonders hitherto unseen by the colonial natives. Let's first get the gross factual inaccuracies out of the way. If southern India's temples and northern India's Mughal and Maratha forts alone are to be taken together, they are comparable, if not surpassing, many aspects of British architecture that India was happy to add to its long history of architectural wonders dating back to the times preceding the industrial revolution and hence special for the extra efforts required (Er, has Mr Carlson heard of the Taj Mahal or the Tanjore temple, perchance?). Read more: Shashi Tharoor 'loses cool' as TV anchor Tucker Carlson says Britain civilised India As for churches, they are beautiful but they are essentially shrines, just like temples and mosques. Delhi's Jama Masjid with its beautiful domes has its own architectural charm. Now, for the institutions. The East India Company indeed built an army that eventually morphed into the British Indian army that in turn fought in the first and second world wars to help the Empire before finding its own native identity. But that, like many other institutions and practices given to India by the British, were essentially meant to strengthen the Empire and its control over India. In other words, like cricket, the institutional gifts given to India by the United Kingdom were largely accidental or incidental, and for most parts, unintentional. Here's where I must salute our own skills. Jawaharlal Nehru and Mahatma Gandhi accepted the British idea of self-governance (swaraj) before they arrived conclusively at 'Poorna Swaraj' (independence). To that extent, their idioms of political discourse followed British practices. And in my view and those of many others, they, instead of demolishing the stuff and building a Central Vista in a hurry, simply turned them one by one into something more Indian, more democratic, and more resourceful. Here, we may be gently reminded of the fact that the 1940s saw India suffer the triple whammy of a world war, the British-induced Bengal famine, and the horrible partition that led to bloody riots. Independent India saved and created precious stuff, and destroying old laws and buildings was not among the priorities. What the Indian National Congress did in its post-independence avatar of being the ruling party, and not a freedom movement, was to live up to the old saying: When life gives you lemons, make lemonade. And so, the Viceroy's House became Rashtrapati Bhavan. The British-style monarch's agent was replaced in the same palace by the First Citizen called the President of India. The seat of the Imperial Legislative Council was renamed Sansad Bhavan. The British built railways to take mineral wealth out of India but ended up offering a socio-geographical integration to an ancient land. A beautiful accident, as it were. The Indian Penal Code, sadly enough with its anti-sedition provisions, remains a grim but useful reminder of the double-edged sword that was imperialism. Some of the finest churches and colleges in India were built by Christian Jesuits, but it turns out they came from Portugal and France, not Britain. St Francis Xavier opened India's first Jesuit school in Goa in 1543, much before the East India Company set foot in India. It was named St. Paul's College. High-power colleges like the multiple St Xavier's and Loyola chains came much later. Thomas Babington Macaulay is credited for introducing English education into India under William Bentinck, the Governor-General of India, who also played a vital role in abolishing the practice of Sati (widow burning) in India. While the British do deserve credit for doing away with some horrible practices, it must be remembered that English was introduced as an instrument to promote Western culture, recommended by law council member Macaulay as "useful learning" with an air of "superiority of the Europeans". Macaulay, circa 1835, would not have imagined that English would one day run a thing he would not have heard of, called the computer, or that the United States, with its freshly-minted independence from British rule, would become a technology superpower. This was another case of lemonade manufactured by India with a British lemon. Ancient Hindu mathematician Aryabhatta is often credited for inventing the symbol for zero, which is at the heart of binary algebra that runs computers. But that's another story, though not unrelated where colonialism is glorified without substantiation. You could say the British did do some good things in India, such as incidentally bringing in the Industrial Revolution and modern democratic practices, but they are equally (dis)credited for de-industrialising India's homegrown artisans while practising democracy at home and plunderous imperialism in their colonies. As a direct beneficiary of both democratic India and the English language, I certainly have a soft corner for some of the things that colonialism did, but enough has been written by solid researchers on both the loot and the use of "rule of law" for authoritarian rule by the British to further their own quest for power. Some say Indians should not bother about a Fox News anchor. On an impulse, I agree, but on deep thought, somebody who can mislead the average Republican voter in the US needs to be told "Hold my beer". Certainly, someone called Carlson whose name is also that of a famous beer brand. (Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.) WATCH WION LIVE HERE:

How British imperialism gave some colonial lemons and democratic India made some modern lemonade

Should India Continue Following Embarrassing Customs Of The Colonial Era? 72 years after independence, India continues to be saddled with vestiges of the colonial era. Here's a report

Gravitas: India remains saddled with vestiges of Colonial era