Australia on Friday acknowledged it may have killed as many as 18 civilians in an air strike on Mosul two years ago, during a massive and ultimately successful campaign to dislodge jihadi fighters.

Following an internal investigation, the Australian Defence Forces said coalition raids against Islamic State group positions in the then-occupied northern Iraqi city on June 13, 2017 "may have caused civilian casualties".

"The coalition assesses that between six and 18 civilians may have been killed," during strikes on the Al Shafaar neighbourhood.

Air Marshal Mel Hupfeld indicated there was no firm information about the number of deaths or whether they came as a result of the Australian strike, or from other coalition members.

The intense aerial bombardment to retake what had been Iraq's second-largest city has already been the subject of intense scrutiny, with the US-led coalition admitting over 1,100 civilian casualties.

A total of 30,008 strikes against IS were carried out between August 2014 and the end of August 2018, with the Mosul campaign being particularly intense.

Critics have alleged the coalition strategy leaned too much on overwhelming air power. While quicker and posing fewer risks for coalition forces, they allege it put civilians at greater risk.&nbsp;

Monitoring group Airwars says the number of civilian deaths acknowledged by the coalition is well below the true toll of the bombing campaign, estimating that at least 7,468 civilians were killed.

IS was known to hold civilians as human shields in a deliberate effort evade detection, deter air strikes and shape Western public opinion against the war.

Hupfeld said the Australian strike was requested by Iraqi security forces and was in "full compliance with the law of armed conflict and applicable rules of engagement".

"The Australian Defence Force takes all feasible precautions to minimise the risk of civilian casualties."

Ahead of the strike, seven IS fighters were identified in a building and adjacent courtyard, armed with heavy weapons.

They were hit with a "500lb precision guided munition" which "achieved the effect desired".

Australia's defence forces said the civilian casualties were in a nearby building.

Australia on Friday acknowledged it may have killed as many as 18 civilians in an air strike on Mosul two years ago, during a massive and ultimately successful campaign to dislodge jihadi fighters.

Australia on Friday acknowledged it may have killed as many as 18 civilians in an air strike on Mosul two years ago, during a massive and ultimately successful campaign to dislodge jihadi fighters. Following an internal investigation, the Australian Defence Forces said coalition raids against Islamic State group positions in the then-occupied northern Iraqi city on June 13, 2017 "may have caused civilian casualties". "The coalition assesses that between six and 18 civilians may have been killed," during strikes on the Al Shafaar neighbourhood. Air Marshal Mel Hupfeld indicated there was no firm information about the number of deaths or whether they came as a result of the Australian strike, or from other coalition members. The intense aerial bombardment to retake what had been Iraq's second-largest city has already been the subject of intense scrutiny, with the US-led coalition admitting over 1,100 civilian casualties. A total of 30,008 strikes against IS were carried out between August 2014 and the end of August 2018, with the Mosul campaign being particularly intense. Critics have alleged the coalition strategy leaned too much on overwhelming air power. While quicker and posing fewer risks for coalition forces, they allege it put civilians at greater risk. Monitoring group Airwars says the number of civilian deaths acknowledged by the coalition is well below the true toll of the bombing campaign, estimating that at least 7,468 civilians were killed. IS was known to hold civilians as human shields in a deliberate effort evade detection, deter air strikes and shape Western public opinion against the war. Hupfeld said the Australian strike was requested by Iraqi security forces and was in "full compliance with the law of armed conflict and applicable rules of engagement". "The Australian Defence Force takes all feasible precautions to minimise the risk of civilian casualties." Ahead of the strike, seven IS fighters were identified in a building and adjacent courtyard, armed with heavy weapons. They were hit with a "500lb precision guided munition" which "achieved the effect desired". Australia's defence forces said the civilian casualties were in a nearby building.

Australia admits 'may have killed' civilians in 2017 Mosul raid

A Zimbabwe High Court has ruled that the military takeover that led to Robert Mugabe&#39;s ousting was legal, raising immediate concerns about judicial independence under the country&#39;s new administration.

Army chiefs put military vehicles on the streets of Harare and placed veteran leader Mugabe, 93, under house arrest, before he resigned on Tuesday.

<a href="http://www.wionews.com/world/mugabe-granted-immunity-from-prosecution-assured-of-safety-in-zimbabwe-sources-24948">Many Zimbabweans celebrated the end of Mugabe&#39;s 37-year rule</a>, but fear the new government under President Emmerson Mnangagwa could also be an authoritarian regime.

&quot;Actions by the Zimbabwe Defence Forces to stop the usurping of power by those close to former president Robert Mugabe are constitutional,&quot; state-run ZBC media on Saturday reported the court as saying.

In an apparent reference to Mugabe&#39;s wife Grace and her supporters, it said the court ruled Friday that the takeover was &quot;to ensure the non-elected individual do not exercise powers that can only be exercised by (those) elected&quot;.

Grace was alleged to have positioned herself to be Mugabe&#39;s chosen successor,&nbsp;prompting the military to intervene and usher in their preferred candidate Mnangagwa.

<a href="http://www.wionews.com/world/end-of-mugabe-era-zimbabwes-mnangagwa-sworn-in-as-president-25022">Mnangagwa was sworn in on Friday, </a>vowing sweeping changes and seeking to attract foreign investment to revive the moribund economy.

He used his inauguration speech to pay tribute to the increasingly frail Mugabe, describing him as one of the &quot;founding fathers of our nation&quot;.

Alongside another court ruling that Mugabe&#39;s earlier sacking of Mnangagwa as vice president was illegal, Human Rights Watch questioned the courts&#39; independence.

&quot;Two incredible judgements,&quot; Dewa Mavhinga, southern African director of HRW, wrote on Twitter. &quot;Strange, captured judiciary?&quot;

A Zimbabwe High Court has ruled that the military takeover that led to Robert Mugabe's ousting was legal, raising immediate concerns about judicial independence under the country's new administration

A Zimbabwe High Court has ruled that the military takeover that led to Robert Mugabe's ousting was legal, raising immediate concerns about judicial independence under the country's new administration. Army chiefs put military vehicles on the streets of Harare and placed veteran leader Mugabe, 93, under house arrest, before he resigned on Tuesday. Many Zimbabweans celebrated the end of Mugabe's 37-year rule, but fear the new government under President Emmerson Mnangagwa could also be an authoritarian regime. "Actions by the Zimbabwe Defence Forces to stop the usurping of power by those close to former president Robert Mugabe are constitutional," state-run ZBC media on Saturday reported the court as saying. In an apparent reference to Mugabe's wife Grace and her supporters, it said the court ruled Friday that the takeover was "to ensure the non-elected individual do not exercise powers that can only be exercised by (those) elected". Grace was alleged to have positioned herself to be Mugabe's chosen successor, prompting the military to intervene and usher in their preferred candidate Mnangagwa. Mnangagwa was sworn in on Friday, vowing sweeping changes and seeking to attract foreign investment to revive the moribund economy. He used his inauguration speech to pay tribute to the increasingly frail Mugabe, describing him as one of the "founding fathers of our nation". Alongside another court ruling that Mugabe's earlier sacking of Mnangagwa as vice president was illegal, Human Rights Watch questioned the courts' independence. "Two incredible judgements," Dewa Mavhinga, southern African director of HRW, wrote on Twitter. "Strange, captured judiciary?"

Zimbabwe court rules military takeover legal

defence-force-military

Defence Force Military, News on Defence Force Military, stories on Defence Force Military, articles on Defence Force Military, Defence Force Military stories at Wion, Defence Force Military news, Defence Force Military latest news

defence force-military

Australia admits 'may have killed' civilians in 2017 Mosul raid

Zimbabwe court rules military takeover legal