For a lot of people, waking up to the smell of freshly-roasted coffee is a must-have and researchers have concluded that it might actually be life-saving.

A new research has suggested that coffee might be linked to lower chances of developing chronic liver diseases. This has come after another previous research has suggested that drinking coffee could help decrease the chances of liver cancer/hepatocellular cancer (HCC).

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/we-finally-know-what-causes-mesmerising-auroras-in-polar-night-skies-393085" hreflang="en">We finally know what causes mesmerising auroras in polar night skies!</a>

"It confirms in a large UK cohort that coffee drinking is protective against severe liver disease," said Prof Paul Roderick, a co-author of the study from the University of Southampton.

The conclusion was made by observing participants aged 40 to 69 who were regular coffee drinkers. After a median period of nearly 11 years, researchers concluded that coffee drinkers had 20 per cent less chance of developing fatty liver or chronic liver diseases, than&nbsp;those who do not consume coffee at all.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/indian-scientists-discover-four-near-earth-asteroids-in-nasa-backed-research-programme-393060" hreflang="en">Indian scientists discover four near-Earth asteroids in NASA-backed research programme</a>

It was also observed that regular coffee drinkers had 49 per cent less chance of dying from chronic liver disease, than non-coffee consumers.

Interestingly, the researchers found out that the chances of chronic liver diseases decreased with an increase in the number of coffee cups per day. The chances declined further up to four cups a day, but “beyond which further increases in consumption provided no additional benefit”.

However, scientists have also urged people to not just consume coffee but also decrease their intake of alcohol to wade off chronic liver diseases.

For a lot of people, waking up to the smell of freshly-roasted coffee is a must-have and researchers have concluded that it might actually be life-saving. A new research has suggested that coffee might be linked to lower chances of developing chronic liver diseases.

For a lot of people, waking up to the smell of freshly-roasted coffee is a must-have and researchers have concluded that it might actually be life-saving. A new research has suggested that coffee might be linked to lower chances of developing chronic liver diseases. This has come after another previous research has suggested that drinking coffee could help decrease the chances of liver cancer/hepatocellular cancer (HCC). Also read | We finally know what causes mesmerising auroras in polar night skies! "It confirms in a large UK cohort that coffee drinking is protective against severe liver disease," said Prof Paul Roderick, a co-author of the study from the University of Southampton. The conclusion was made by observing participants aged 40 to 69 who were regular coffee drinkers. After a median period of nearly 11 years, researchers concluded that coffee drinkers had 20 per cent less chance of developing fatty liver or chronic liver diseases, than those who do not consume coffee at all. Also read | Indian scientists discover four near-Earth asteroids in NASA-backed research programme It was also observed that regular coffee drinkers had 49 per cent less chance of dying from chronic liver disease, than non-coffee consumers. Interestingly, the researchers found out that the chances of chronic liver diseases decreased with an increase in the number of coffee cups per day. The chances declined further up to four cups a day, but “beyond which further increases in consumption provided no additional benefit”. However, scientists have also urged people to not just consume coffee but also decrease their intake of alcohol to wade off chronic liver diseases.

Drinking coffee regularly decreases chances of chronic liver diseases: Study

Starbucks Corp and other coffee sellers must put a cancer warning on coffee sold in California, a Los Angeles judge has ruled, possibly exposing the companies to millions of dollars in fines.

A little-known not-for-profit group sued some 90 coffee retailers, including Starbucks, on grounds they were violating a California law requiring companies to warn consumers of chemicals in their products that could cause cancer.

One of those chemicals is acrylamide, a byproduct of roasting coffee beans that is present in high levels in brewed coffee.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elihu Berle said in a decision dated Wednesday that Starbucks and other companies had failed to show there was no significant risk from a carcinogen produced in the coffee roasting process, court documents showed.

Starbucks and other defendants have until April 10 to file objections to the decision.

Starbucks declined to comment, referring reporters to a statement by the National Coffee Association (NCA) that said the industry was considering an appeal and further legal actions.

"Cancer warning labels on coffee would be misleading. The US&nbspgovernment’s own Dietary Guidelines state that coffee can be part of a healthy lifestyle," the NCA statement said.

In his decision, Berle said: "Defendants failed to satisfy their burden of proving by a preponderance of evidence that consumption of coffee confers a benefit to human health."

Officials from Dunkin’ Donuts, McDonald's Corp, Peet's and other big coffee sellers did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The lawsuit was filed in 2010 by the Council for Education and Research on Toxics (CERT). It calls for fines as large as $2,500 per person for every exposure to the chemical since 2002 at the defendants’ shops in California. Any civil penalties, which will be decided in a third phase of the trial, could be huge in California, which has a population of nearly 40 million.

CERT's lawyer Raphael Metzger did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Starbucks lost the first phase of the trial in which it failed to show the level of acrylamide in coffee was below that which would pose a significant risk of cancer. In the second phase of the trial, defendants failed to prove there was an acceptable "alternative" risk level for the carcinogen, court documents showed.

Several defendants in the case settled before Wednesday's decision, agreeing to post signage about the cancer-linked chemical and pay millions in fines, according to published reports.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elihu Berle said in a decision dated Wednesday that Starbucks and other companies had failed to show there was no significant risk from a carcinogen produced in the coffee roasting process

Starbucks Corp and other coffee sellers must put a cancer warning on coffee sold in California, a Los Angeles judge has ruled, possibly exposing the companies to millions of dollars in fines. A little-known not-for-profit group sued some 90 coffee retailers, including Starbucks, on grounds they were violating a California law requiring companies to warn consumers of chemicals in their products that could cause cancer. One of those chemicals is acrylamide, a byproduct of roasting coffee beans that is present in high levels in brewed coffee. Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elihu Berle said in a decision dated Wednesday that Starbucks and other companies had failed to show there was no significant risk from a carcinogen produced in the coffee roasting process, court documents showed. Starbucks and other defendants have until April 10 to file objections to the decision. Starbucks declined to comment, referring reporters to a statement by the National Coffee Association (NCA) that said the industry was considering an appeal and further legal actions. "Cancer warning labels on coffee would be misleading. The US&nbspgovernment’s own Dietary Guidelines state that coffee can be part of a healthy lifestyle," the NCA statement said. In his decision, Berle said: "Defendants failed to satisfy their burden of proving by a preponderance of evidence that consumption of coffee confers a benefit to human health." Officials from Dunkin’ Donuts, McDonald's Corp, Peet's and other big coffee sellers did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The lawsuit was filed in 2010 by the Council for Education and Research on Toxics (CERT). It calls for fines as large as $2,500 per person for every exposure to the chemical since 2002 at the defendants’ shops in California. Any civil penalties, which will be decided in a third phase of the trial, could be huge in California, which has a population of nearly 40 million. CERT's lawyer Raphael Metzger did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Starbucks lost the first phase of the trial in which it failed to show the level of acrylamide in coffee was below that which would pose a significant risk of cancer. In the second phase of the trial, defendants failed to prove there was an acceptable "alternative" risk level for the carcinogen, court documents showed. Several defendants in the case settled before Wednesday's decision, agreeing to post signage about the cancer-linked chemical and pay millions in fines, according to published reports.

Starbucks coffee in California must have cancer warning, says judge

coffee-cancer-warning

Coffee Cancer Warning, News on Coffee Cancer Warning, stories on Coffee Cancer Warning, articles on Coffee Cancer Warning, Coffee Cancer Warning stories at Wion, Coffee Cancer Warning news, Coffee Cancer Warning latest news

coffee cancer-warning

Drinking coffee regularly decreases chances of chronic liver diseases: Study

Starbucks coffee in California must have cancer warning, says judge