After a week of hostility and public confrontation, the UK broadcaster on Monday (17 Nov) said it will challenge any legal action by the United States President Donald Trump, claiming there is "no basis for a defamation suit." Trump has threatened the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) with between $1 billion and 5 billion over an edited version of one of his past speeches.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-slams-dishonest-bbc-1762785769573">Trump slams ‘dishonest’ BBC; outgoing news chief Turness defends it as ‘not institutionally biased’</a>&nbsp;Speaking to reporters on Saturday, Trump said, “We’ll sue them. We’ll sue them for anywhere between a billion and five billion dollars, probably sometime next week. We have to do it, they’ve even admitted that they cheated. Not that they couldn’t have done that. They cheated. They changed the words coming out of my mouth.”&nbsp;BBC chair Samir Shah wrote a letter to Trump apologising for the edit, but he said he strongly disagreed that there was a basis for a defamation claim. &nbsp;Shah, in an email to BBC staff on Monday, said there was speculation about the possibility of legal action, including potential costs or settlements.&nbsp;"In all this we are, of course, acutely aware of the privilege of our funding and the need to protect our licence fee payers, the British public," Shah wrote.&nbsp;"I want to be very clear with you - our position has not changed. There is no basis for a defamation case, and we are determined to fight this."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-re-pardons-militia-member-involved-in-capitol-hill-riots-united-states-president-trump-joe-biden-kamla-harris-1763385485078">Trump re-pardons militia member involved in Capitol Hill riots</a>&nbsp; Two top BBC executives, Head of News Deborah Turness and Director-General Tim Davie, resigned on November 10. Following her resignation, Turness said the corporation "is not institutionally biased." "Mistakes are made", but the BBC's journalists are “hardworking people who strive for impartiality.”&nbsp;The BBC has come under criticism for editing a portion of Trump's January 6, 2021, speech delivered before protesters stormed the US Capitol in Washington. Critics argued that the edited version, featured in a BBC documentary, was misleading as it omitted a key section in which Trump urged his supporters to demonstrate "peacefully and patriotically."&nbsp;

BBC chair Samir Shah wrote a letter to Trump apologising for the edit, but he said he strongly disagreed that there was a basis for a defamation claim.

After a week of hostility and public confrontation, the UK broadcaster on Monday (17 Nov) said it will challenge any legal action by the United States President Donald Trump, claiming there is "no basis for a defamation suit." Trump has threatened the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) with between $1 billion and 5 billion over an edited version of one of his past speeches. Also Read: Trump slams ‘dishonest’ BBC; outgoing news chief Turness defends it as ‘not institutionally biased’ Speaking to reporters on Saturday, Trump said, “We’ll sue them. We’ll sue them for anywhere between a billion and five billion dollars, probably sometime next week. We have to do it, they’ve even admitted that they cheated. Not that they couldn’t have done that. They cheated. They changed the words coming out of my mouth.” BBC chair Samir Shah wrote a letter to Trump apologising for the edit, but he said he strongly disagreed that there was a basis for a defamation claim. Shah, in an email to BBC staff on Monday, said there was speculation about the possibility of legal action, including potential costs or settlements. "In all this we are, of course, acutely aware of the privilege of our funding and the need to protect our licence fee payers, the British public," Shah wrote. "I want to be very clear with you - our position has not changed. There is no basis for a defamation case, and we are determined to fight this." Also Read: Trump re-pardons militia member involved in Capitol Hill riots Two top BBC executives, Head of News Deborah Turness and Director-General Tim Davie, resigned on November 10. Following her resignation, Turness said the corporation "is not institutionally biased." "Mistakes are made", but the BBC's journalists are “hardworking people who strive for impartiality.” The BBC has come under criticism for editing a portion of Trump's January 6, 2021, speech delivered before protesters stormed the US Capitol in Washington. Critics argued that the edited version, featured in a BBC documentary, was misleading as it omitted a key section in which Trump urged his supporters to demonstrate "peacefully and patriotically."

BBC chair Samir Shah wrote a letter to Trump apologising for the edit, but he said he strongly disagreed that there was a basis for a defamation claim.

Trump vs BBC: UK broadcaster vows to fight president’s defamation claims

A massive drama is on between the British news broadcaster BBC and US President Donald Trump. The Republican has accused the organisation, in a documentary in 2024, of allegedly creating a false perception that he urged supporters to “fight like hell" and march with him to the US Capitol in January 2021. After the American president threatened to sue the BBC, the organisation issued an apology. But despite the public apology, Trump said on Friday (Nov 15) that he would sue the news outlet for up to $5 billion.&nbsp;Trump, while speaking to the reporters aboard Air Force One, said that he would file a lawsuit “probably sometime next week". He added that the edit “changed the words coming out of my mouth." This statement, reported by Reuters first, has escalated the tension in a controversy that has already triggered the resignation of the BBC’s director general and head of news.&nbsp;What is the centre of controversy?&nbsp;It all began when the Daily Telegraph published a few portions of an internal BBC memo that was written by former standards adviser Michael Prescott. The memo criticised the BBC’s Panorama programme titled Trump: A Second Chance?. It was aired just before the 2024 US presidential election.&nbsp;Now, as per Reuters, the documentary combined three separate clips of Trump's January 6, 2021, speech, which gave an impression of a continuous speech. The edit made it appear as if Trump had urged his supporters to “fight like hell" shortly before the Capitol was overrun.&nbsp;Trump's lawyer called the documentary “false and defamatory". It was also claimed that the portion of speech stitched together has at least an hour gap. Giving an interview to GB News, Trump said the documentary's edit was "impossible to believe".&nbsp;“I made a beautiful statement, and they made it into a not beautiful statement… Fake news was a great term, except it’s not strong enough. This is beyond fake, this is corrupt," the American president added.&nbsp;What was the BBC's response?&nbsp;The BBC admitted that the edit in the documentary was an "error of judgment". Initially, the organisation hesitated, but later, the BBC's chairperson, Samir Shah, sent a formal letter to the White House as an apology on Thursday (Nov 13). “While the BBC sincerely regrets the manner in which the video clip was edited, we strongly disagree that there is a basis for a defamation claim," the British broadcaster said in a statement. The organisation also said that it would not rebroadcast the documentary.&nbsp;But was this going to relax the American president?&nbsp;Trump threatens to sue the BBC for $5 billion - but why?&nbsp;Trump has claimed that the mistake by the BBC was actually a deliberate attempt to damage his reputation. “I think I have to do that, I mean, they’ve even admitted that they cheated… They changed the words coming out of my mouth," he told reporters.&nbsp;Earlier, Trump's lawyers had said that if the BBC did not apologise, the American president would sue them for nothing less than $1 billion. Now, the Republican is saying the amount could go up to $5 billion. Moreover, Trump also said that the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer was "very embarrassed" by the act. He said the British PM tried to reach him, but he would connect with him over the weekend.&nbsp;Why is the situation worse for the BBC than it seems?&nbsp;The latest issue has now raised questions on the BBC's legitimacy in coverage of the Israel-Hamas war. Now, speculations of biased coverage on key geopolitical issues arise for the British outlet.&nbsp;What are the chances Trump would win the lawsuit?&nbsp;Reports hinted that the process of winning the lawsuit against the BBC might be challenging for the American president. As per a report by AP, the most difficult part for Trump would be to show the harm the edit caused. Trump either way won the 2024 US election - and this scenario weakens his case and makes it difficult to prove that the documentary damaged his reputation.

The latest issue has now raised questions on the BBC legitimacy in coverage of the Israel-Hamas war. Now, speculations of biased coverage on key geopolitical issues arise for the British outlet.



A massive drama is on between the British news broadcaster BBC and US President Donald Trump. The Republican has accused the organisation, in a documentary in 2024, of allegedly creating a false perception that he urged supporters to “fight like hell" and march with him to the US Capitol in January 2021. After the American president threatened to sue the BBC, the organisation issued an apology. But despite the public apology, Trump said on Friday (Nov 15) that he would sue the news outlet for up to $5 billion. Trump, while speaking to the reporters aboard Air Force One, said that he would file a lawsuit “probably sometime next week". He added that the edit “changed the words coming out of my mouth." This statement, reported by Reuters first, has escalated the tension in a controversy that has already triggered the resignation of the BBC’s director general and head of news. What is the centre of controversy? It all began when the Daily Telegraph published a few portions of an internal BBC memo that was written by former standards adviser Michael Prescott. The memo criticised the BBC’s Panorama programme titled Trump: A Second Chance?. It was aired just before the 2024 US presidential election. Now, as per Reuters, the documentary combined three separate clips of Trump's January 6, 2021, speech, which gave an impression of a continuous speech. The edit made it appear as if Trump had urged his supporters to “fight like hell" shortly before the Capitol was overrun. Trump's lawyer called the documentary “false and defamatory". It was also claimed that the portion of speech stitched together has at least an hour gap. Giving an interview to GB News, Trump said the documentary's edit was "impossible to believe". “I made a beautiful statement, and they made it into a not beautiful statement… Fake news was a great term, except it’s not strong enough. This is beyond fake, this is corrupt," the American president added. What was the BBC's response? The BBC admitted that the edit in the documentary was an "error of judgment". Initially, the organisation hesitated, but later, the BBC's chairperson, Samir Shah, sent a formal letter to the White House as an apology on Thursday (Nov 13). “While the BBC sincerely regrets the manner in which the video clip was edited, we strongly disagree that there is a basis for a defamation claim," the British broadcaster said in a statement. The organisation also said that it would not rebroadcast the documentary. But was this going to relax the American president? Trump threatens to sue the BBC for $5 billion - but why? Trump has claimed that the mistake by the BBC was actually a deliberate attempt to damage his reputation. “I think I have to do that, I mean, they’ve even admitted that they cheated… They changed the words coming out of my mouth," he told reporters. Earlier, Trump's lawyers had said that if the BBC did not apologise, the American president would sue them for nothing less than $1 billion. Now, the Republican is saying the amount could go up to $5 billion. Moreover, Trump also said that the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer was "very embarrassed" by the act. He said the British PM tried to reach him, but he would connect with him over the weekend. Why is the situation worse for the BBC than it seems? The latest issue has now raised questions on the BBC's legitimacy in coverage of the Israel-Hamas war. Now, speculations of biased coverage on key geopolitical issues arise for the British outlet. What are the chances Trump would win the lawsuit? Reports hinted that the process of winning the lawsuit against the BBC might be challenging for the American president. As per a report by AP, the most difficult part for Trump would be to show the harm the edit caused. Trump either way won the 2024 US election - and this scenario weakens his case and makes it difficult to prove that the documentary damaged his reputation.

The latest issue has now raised questions on the BBC's legitimacy in coverage of the Israel-Hamas war. Now, speculations of biased coverage on key geopolitical issues arise for the British outlet.&nbsp;

BBC vs Trump: Why Trump plans to sue despite the apology — and why the fallout is worse for BBC than it looks

bbc-vs-trump

Bbc Vs Trump, News on Bbc Vs Trump, stories on Bbc Vs Trump, articles on Bbc Vs Trump, Bbc Vs Trump stories at Wion, Bbc Vs Trump news, Bbc Vs Trump latest news

bbc vs-trump

Trump vs BBC: UK broadcaster vows to fight president’s defamation claims

BBC vs Trump: Why Trump plans to sue despite the apology?