The Donald Trump administration, as per reports, is planning to drop its controversial $1.8 billion weaponisation fund. In a statement on Monday (Jun 1), the Justice Department said it would abide by a court order temporarily freezing what has been dubbed a "slush fund" for the President's political allies.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-intercepts-lebanon-projectiles-hours-after-trump-s-f-ing-crazy-call-with-netanyahu-israel-lebanon-war-iran-war-truce-1780360547603">Israel intercepts Lebanon projectiles hours after Trump’s ‘f***ing crazy’ call with Netanyahu</a><h2>Trump's weaponisation fund 'dead for now'</h2>"It's dead for now," reported Axios, citing sources. In recent days, the $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponisation' fund has come under fierce criticism by Democrats and even some members of Trump's Republican Party.Just last week, US District Judge Leonie Brinkema barred the Trump administration from taking any further action to create or operate the so-called "Anti-Weaponisation Fund" ahead of a June 12 court hearing. Taking to X, the Trump DoJ said that while it "disagrees strongly" with the decision, it "will abide by the court's ruling."Amid criticism that the fund was actually a slush fund that could be tapped by those convicted in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, the Justice Department said that it was meant to "make up for the tremendous abuse, harm, and hate unfairly shown to so many people." It insisted that the fund was "open to anybody who was so weaponised, targeted, or persecuted, whether they were Democrat, Republican, Conservative, Independent, or otherwise."

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">The Department of Justice disagrees strongly with the decision on the Anti-Weaponization Fund put forth by the United States District Court Judge in the Eastern District of Virginia, wherein the Court stated that, under no circumstances, may the Department of Justice proceed with…&mdash; U.S. Department of Justice (@TheJusticeDept) <a href="https://x.com/TheJusticeDept/status/2061531380735951193?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 1, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/for-eternity-trump-says-israel-hezbollah-agreed-to-stop-fighting-but-fresh-projectiles-from-lebanon-raise-doubts-1780362414089">'For ETERNITY': Trump says Israel, Hezbollah agreed to stop fighting, but fresh projectiles from Lebanon raise doubts</a><h2>An extraordinary settlement for Trump allies</h2>The so-called 'anti-weaponisation" fund was created by the DoJ as part of an extraordinary settlement of a Trump civil lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service over the leak of his tax returns by a former government contractor.While the Trump administration claims that the fund would compensate people who suffered for government weaponisation and warfare, critics say that it has no clear legal basis. They allege that it could be used to reward trump allies and loyalists, including the January 6 rioters who launched an assault on Capitol Hill in 2021 seeking to overturn Trump's election loss to Joe Biden.

The controversial $1.8 billion Justice Department fund touted by Donald Trump as compensation for alleged government "weaponisation" may already be dead, suggest reports. Scroll down to see why critics call it a political slush fund and what happens next.

The Donald Trump administration, as per reports, is planning to drop its controversial $1.8 billion weaponisation fund. In a statement on Monday (Jun 1), the Justice Department said it would abide by a court order temporarily freezing what has been dubbed a "slush fund" for the President's political allies. Also read | Israel intercepts Lebanon projectiles hours after Trump’s ‘f***ing crazy’ call with Netanyahu Trump's weaponisation fund 'dead for now' "It's dead for now," reported Axios, citing sources. In recent days, the $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponisation' fund has come under fierce criticism by Democrats and even some members of Trump's Republican Party. Just last week, US District Judge Leonie Brinkema barred the Trump administration from taking any further action to create or operate the so-called "Anti-Weaponisation Fund" ahead of a June 12 court hearing. Taking to X, the Trump DoJ said that while it "disagrees strongly" with the decision, it "will abide by the court's ruling." Amid criticism that the fund was actually a slush fund that could be tapped by those convicted in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, the Justice Department said that it was meant to "make up for the tremendous abuse, harm, and hate unfairly shown to so many people." It insisted that the fund was "open to anybody who was so weaponised, targeted, or persecuted, whether they were Democrat, Republican, Conservative, Independent, or otherwise."

The controversial $1.8 billion Justice Department fund touted by Donald Trump as compensation for alleged government "weaponisation" may already be dead, suggest reports. Scroll down to see why critics call it a political slush fund and what happens next.

Trump's controversial $1.8 billion weaponisation fund 'dead for now'? DoJ says it will abide by court's freeze order

anti-weaponisation-fund

Anti Weaponisation Fund, News on Anti Weaponisation Fund, stories on Anti Weaponisation Fund, articles on Anti Weaponisation Fund, Anti Weaponisation Fund stories at Wion, Anti Weaponisation Fund news, Anti Weaponisation Fund latest news

anti weaponisation-fund

Trump's controversial $1.8 billion weaponisation fund 'dead for now'? DoJ says it will abide by court's freeze order