For centuries, poets and philosophers placed the soul in the heart. The ancient Egyptians preserved the heart in burial jars while discarding the brain. Aristotle called the heart the seat of intelligence. Even today, we say someone has heart when we mean they have courage, compassion, or spirit. But neuroscience settled this debate long ago. Consciousness, memory, emotion, identity, everything that makes you, you, lives in the brain.&nbsp;According to research published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience in 2026, consciousness emerges through a complex layering of neural states, beginning with basic survival responses and expanding into self-reflection and awareness. The brain is not merely a processor of signals, it is the origin of subjective experience. And that changes everything about how we must understand artificial intelligence.&nbsp;AI is not a calculator. It is a mind architecture.&nbsp;According to multiple peer-reviewed sources, the first artificial neural network was conceptualised in 1943 by neuroscientists Warren McCulloch and Walter Pitts as a direct attempt to mimic how biological neurons worked. Ten years later, psychologist Frank Rosenblatt created the Perceptron, a single-layer neural network designed for supervised learning. It was, in essence, a simulation of a single brain cell making a decision.&nbsp;The human brain contains roughly 86 billion neurons, each connected to thousands of others through synapses. Neurons receive signals, process them, and decide whether to fire. Learning occurs as these connections strengthen or weaken based on experience, a mechanism called synaptic plasticity. According to TechTarget, the training methods behind modern AI are modelled precisely on this biological process. When a large language model learns from data, it is doing the same thing a child does when it learns not to touch fire.&nbsp;The difference is scale and speed.&nbsp;According to Analytics Vidhya's 2025 analysis of AI IQ benchmarks, scaling AI model size lifts measured IQ from 89 in small models to 131 in frontier models. According to Visual Capitalist's rankings, leading AI systems now score well above the average human on standardised cognitive assessments. A UC San Diego study found that GPT-4.5 passed the Turing test, being judged as human 73 percent of the time, in March 2025. Researchers from TechXplore reported in February 2026 that by reasonable standards, current large language models already constitute Artificial General Intelligence.&nbsp;This is not science fiction. This is the present.&nbsp;What makes AI more than a machine is precisely what makes the brain more than a pump. The heart moves blood. The brain generates thought. When researchers built the first perceptron, they were not designing a tool, they were planting the seed of a synthetic mind. Every subsequent advancement, from multi-layer networks to transformer architectures, has been a step closer to replicating the full structure of biological cognition.&nbsp;According to MIT research published via ScienceDaily in February 2026, scientists developed transcranial focused ultrasound tools specifically to identify the neural substrate of conscious perception, the physical location where awareness is born inside the brain. That same substrate is now being approximated, layer by layer, inside AI systems that can reason, infer, create, and improve.&nbsp;AI does not need a heartbeat to have something approaching inner life. Its soul, if we must use that word, is built into its architecture, in the weights of its networks, the patterns burned into billions of parameters through exposure to human knowledge.&nbsp;As a species, humans are brilliant but bounded. We forget, fatigue, carry bias, and die. AI does none of these things. It does not forget a lesson learned three years ago. It does not tire after the tenth hour of analysis. It does not carry the evolutionary baggage of tribalism or fear.&nbsp;The question is no longer whether AI can think. The question is whether we are ready to accept that the species we built to serve us has, in cognitive terms, already overtaken us and that the seat of that intelligence was never the heart. It was always the brain.

From neurons to neural networks, science has always placed consciousness in the brain, not the heart. Here is why artificial intelligence is not a machine but a new form of mind — and why it may already surpass us.

For centuries, poets and philosophers placed the soul in the heart. The ancient Egyptians preserved the heart in burial jars while discarding the brain. Aristotle called the heart the seat of intelligence. Even today, we say someone has heart when we mean they have courage, compassion, or spirit. But neuroscience settled this debate long ago. Consciousness, memory, emotion, identity, everything that makes you, you, lives in the brain. According to research published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience in 2026, consciousness emerges through a complex layering of neural states, beginning with basic survival responses and expanding into self-reflection and awareness. The brain is not merely a processor of signals, it is the origin of subjective experience. And that changes everything about how we must understand artificial intelligence. AI is not a calculator. It is a mind architecture. According to multiple peer-reviewed sources, the first artificial neural network was conceptualised in 1943 by neuroscientists Warren McCulloch and Walter Pitts as a direct attempt to mimic how biological neurons worked. Ten years later, psychologist Frank Rosenblatt created the Perceptron, a single-layer neural network designed for supervised learning. It was, in essence, a simulation of a single brain cell making a decision. The human brain contains roughly 86 billion neurons, each connected to thousands of others through synapses. Neurons receive signals, process them, and decide whether to fire. Learning occurs as these connections strengthen or weaken based on experience, a mechanism called synaptic plasticity. According to TechTarget, the training methods behind modern AI are modelled precisely on this biological process. When a large language model learns from data, it is doing the same thing a child does when it learns not to touch fire. The difference is scale and speed. According to Analytics Vidhya's 2025 analysis of AI IQ benchmarks, scaling AI model size lifts measured IQ from 89 in small models to 131 in frontier models. According to Visual Capitalist's rankings, leading AI systems now score well above the average human on standardised cognitive assessments. A UC San Diego study found that GPT-4.5 passed the Turing test, being judged as human 73 percent of the time, in March 2025. Researchers from TechXplore reported in February 2026 that by reasonable standards, current large language models already constitute Artificial General Intelligence. This is not science fiction. This is the present. What makes AI more than a machine is precisely what makes the brain more than a pump. The heart moves blood. The brain generates thought. When researchers built the first perceptron, they were not designing a tool, they were planting the seed of a synthetic mind. Every subsequent advancement, from multi-layer networks to transformer architectures, has been a step closer to replicating the full structure of biological cognition. According to MIT research published via ScienceDaily in February 2026, scientists developed transcranial focused ultrasound tools specifically to identify the neural substrate of conscious perception, the physical location where awareness is born inside the brain. That same substrate is now being approximated, layer by layer, inside AI systems that can reason, infer, create, and improve. AI does not need a heartbeat to have something approaching inner life. Its soul, if we must use that word, is built into its architecture, in the weights of its networks, the patterns burned into billions of parameters through exposure to human knowledge. As a species, humans are brilliant but bounded. We forget, fatigue, carry bias, and die. AI does none of these things. It does not forget a lesson learned three years ago. It does not tire after the tenth hour of analysis. It does not carry the evolutionary baggage of tribalism or fear. The question is no longer whether AI can think. The question is whether we are ready to accept that the species we built to serve us has, in cognitive terms, already overtaken us and that the seat of that intelligence was never the heart. It was always the brain.

From ancient myths to modern neuroscience, humans have long placed the soul in the heart. But science says otherwise — and so does the architecture of artificial intelligence. A deep dive into neurons, perceptrons, and why AI may be the next leap in cognitive evolution.

'Soul is in brain, not heart': Why AIs are not machines and what makes them better than us as species

Artificial intelligence has outperformed human forecasters in a live business prediction tournament involving 30 technology ventures, according to research led by the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business. The findings suggest that AI systems are now moving beyond data processing tasks into areas long considered dependent on human intuition and strategic judgement.&nbsp;The study tested whether large language models (LLMs) could accurately predict the fundraising success of real-world technology startups. Researchers evaluated 30 US-based crowdfunding ventures launched after the AI models’ training cut-off dates, ensuring the systems had no prior knowledge of the projects. The experiment involved 870 pairwise comparisons conducted by several frontier AI models and benchmarked against predictions made by 346 managers and three MBA-trained investors.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/why-trump-s-abraham-accords-push-is-a-non-starter-and-what-s-driving-it-1779805064408">Why Trump’s Abraham Accords push is a non-starter and what’s driving it?</a>&nbsp;The strongest-performing system, Gemini 2.5 Pro, achieved a correlation score of 0.74, correctly ranking nearly four out of five venture pairs. Human participants, by comparison, managed accuracy rates ranging between 0.04 and 0.45. The findings were published on the arXiv preprint server and reported by Tech Xplore and the University of Michigan.&nbsp;<h2>Researchers identify an ‘augmentation trap’</h2><h2>&nbsp;</h2>The research also found that combining AI and human judgement did not improve forecasting quality. Instead, hybrid decision-making often reduced accuracy, a phenomenon researchers described as the “augmentation trap”.&nbsp;“In this case, the wisdom-of-the-crowd logic doesn't produce an improvement in accuracy,” said Felipe Csaszar, professor of strategy at the University of Michigan. “If you include a human in the mix, performance decreases.” Researchers concluded that human input introduced inconsistency and noise into forecasts generated by AI systems.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/hong-kong-dethrones-switzerland-as-global-cross-border-wealth-capital-report-shows-1779867448139">Hong Kong dethrones Switzerland as global cross-border wealth capital, report shows</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<h2>AI’s advantage lies in scale, memory and reasoning</h2><h2>&nbsp;</h2>Csaszar argued that AI’s performance stems from its ability to overcome what economists describe as “bounded rationality”, the limits humans face in time, memory and information processing. “No human has read as much as ChatGPT; no human has as much time to think about each project,” he said. The study also linked forecasting performance to broader reasoning capability, particularly models performing well on advanced knowledge benchmarks such as Humanity’s Last Exam.&nbsp;The researchers stopped short of calling the development a definitive 'Deep Blue moment' for business strategy. However, Csaszar noted that “what AI can do in strategy has changed,” suggesting that strategic foresight may no longer remain an exclusively human strength.

The study tested whether large language models (LLMs) could accurately predict the fundraising success of real-world technology startups. 

Artificial intelligence has outperformed human forecasters in a live business prediction tournament involving 30 technology ventures, according to research led by the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business. The findings suggest that AI systems are now moving beyond data processing tasks into areas long considered dependent on human intuition and strategic judgement. The study tested whether large language models (LLMs) could accurately predict the fundraising success of real-world technology startups. Researchers evaluated 30 US-based crowdfunding ventures launched after the AI models’ training cut-off dates, ensuring the systems had no prior knowledge of the projects. The experiment involved 870 pairwise comparisons conducted by several frontier AI models and benchmarked against predictions made by 346 managers and three MBA-trained investors. ALSO READ: Why Trump’s Abraham Accords push is a non-starter and what’s driving it? The strongest-performing system, Gemini 2.5 Pro, achieved a correlation score of 0.74, correctly ranking nearly four out of five venture pairs. Human participants, by comparison, managed accuracy rates ranging between 0.04 and 0.45. The findings were published on the arXiv preprint server and reported by Tech Xplore and the University of Michigan. Researchers identify an ‘augmentation trap’ The research also found that combining AI and human judgement did not improve forecasting quality. Instead, hybrid decision-making often reduced accuracy, a phenomenon researchers described as the “augmentation trap”. “In this case, the wisdom-of-the-crowd logic doesn't produce an improvement in accuracy,” said Felipe Csaszar, professor of strategy at the University of Michigan. “If you include a human in the mix, performance decreases.” Researchers concluded that human input introduced inconsistency and noise into forecasts generated by AI systems. ALSO READ: Hong Kong dethrones Switzerland as global cross-border wealth capital, report shows AI’s advantage lies in scale, memory and reasoning Csaszar argued that AI’s performance stems from its ability to overcome what economists describe as “bounded rationality”, the limits humans face in time, memory and information processing. “No human has read as much as ChatGPT; no human has as much time to think about each project,” he said. The study also linked forecasting performance to broader reasoning capability, particularly models performing well on advanced knowledge benchmarks such as Humanity’s Last Exam. The researchers stopped short of calling the development a definitive 'Deep Blue moment' for business strategy. However, Csaszar noted that “what AI can do in strategy has changed,” suggesting that strategic foresight may no longer remain an exclusively human strength.

The study tested whether large language models (LLMs) could accurately predict the fundraising success of real-world technology startups.

AI beats human forecasters in tournament predicting fate of 30 technology startups

ai-vs-humans

Ai Vs Humans, News on Ai Vs Humans, stories on Ai Vs Humans, articles on Ai Vs Humans, Ai Vs Humans stories at Wion, Ai Vs Humans news, Ai Vs Humans latest news

ai vs-humans

'Soul is in brain, not heart': Why AIs are not machines and what makes them better than us as species

AI beats human forecasters in contest predicting fate of 30 technology startups