The public distribution system (PDS) constitutes a major thrust of India’s socio-economic policy, even before Independence. It stems from the effective accountability of the government to ensure that its citizens have access to food through its vast network of fair price shops.&nbsp;

The recent decision by the Union government to roll out `One Nation One Ration Card (ONORC)’ is an excellent initiative in that direction.&nbsp;

This pan-India portability scheme seeks to enable PDS beneficiaries to get their quota of food grain from any ration shop of their choice across the country seamlessly.&nbsp;

States like Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Haryana, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Kerala, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Telangana and Tripura have already executed the facilities for ration cardholders to shop anywhere across the state.&nbsp;

The government seeks to achieve the important objective of food security for its citizens through the PDS at affordable prices, since providing food security to people stems from the concept of the welfare state, as enshrined in the Constitution of India.&nbsp;

India, like many countries, subsidises the consumption of certain food and non-food items for the poor through a huge network of ration shops. Trouble is locational heterogeneity and complexity of social relations, which often create barriers to access PDS in India.&nbsp;

The quality of services available in the PDS network is substantially inferior, riddled with corruption, pilferage, adulteration of grains, longer waiting time, sometimes even verbal abuse in the queue and so on.&nbsp;

The PDS cries for urgent reforms both in terms of structural and administrative changes. The ONORC is one such reformative measure, which purports to shift the bargaining power from the PDS dealer to the beneficiaries since ONORC allows the latter to choose the PDS shop of his or her choice.

India has the distinction of having the world’s largest food security programme. The government supplies five kg of subsidised food grain to each person per month to over 81 crore people via 5,00,000 ration shops across the country, costing the exchequer about Rs 1.4 lakh crore annually.&nbsp;

Curiously, the present PDS system is location-linked, which often acts as a &nbsp;barrier to access food entitlements, especially, for migrant workers/families. The ONORC is expected to be far more inclusive and offer barrier-free access to food entitlements for the beneficiaries through the proposed ration card portability.&nbsp;

The migrant workers are one of the largest groups (about 38% of India’s population), which face the artificial barrier of access to the PDS system and plethora of other social security schemes run by the Union and state governments.&nbsp;

‘One Nation, One Ration Card’ is governed by twin principles, i.e. linkage with Aadhar and digitalisation of ration cards to reach out to the real beneficiaries.&nbsp;

However, the fear of exclusion of genuine beneficiaries due to the new system looms large, especially the migrators and their families or the left-behind families who stay back at the village.&nbsp;

It is imperative that the ONORC should take its cue from the government’s National Health Insurance Scheme, which has a Unique Insurance Card to take care of the health care needs of both migrants as well as those left behind.

The linkage of a ration card with a particular shop poses a major challenge for migrant workers, even though many states have allowed intra-state portability, which permits beneficiaries to buy rations from any fair price shops within that state. The ORORC, expected to launch throughout India by June 2020, is expected to address the portability issue.&nbsp;

Even though it is a laudable initiative, it is going to face certain difficulties like lack of concrete data on migrant population/households, in so far as interstate migration is concerned.&nbsp;

The archaic, domicile-based legislations governing access to social welfare schemes rolled out by the government, need to be amended to keep pace with the objectives of those schemes. The allocation of food grain needs to be made dynamic, commensurate with the flow of migrant population.

Another issue likely to adversely affect the beneficiaries is differential entitlements offered by the states as well as the Union government. For example, many states are averse to the idea of granting equal benefits to the migrant population/families, like those granted to domiciled beneficiaries.

Another pertinent issue could come up if members of a single household are split between two different locations. The guidelines of the scheme only permit the purchase of half the subsidised grain at one time in an effort to prevent one member of the household taking the entire ration for the month, thereby depriving rations to family members living in different locations.&nbsp;

Policy makers and civil society have welcomed the move despite some bottlenecks palpably tagged with the system. There are multiple social security schemes, welfare-oriented schemes, food and poverty alleviation schemes implemented by the government, but the migrant labourers, SC/ST, and women remain the most vulnerable groups that are regularly being deprived of the benefits of the scheme.&nbsp;

It is, therefore, imperative that the “One Nation One Ration Card” scheme needs to be more inclusive and offer better access to food at PDS destinations.&nbsp;

This scheme also needs to be more technology-driven in place of the old manual method of record keeping. There is no contrarian point to argue the laudable vision of the grand scheme, but the operational complexities and the speculation of a threat to the federal structure, as raised by some political leaders, need to be ironed out systematically.&nbsp; 
&nbsp;

(This article was originally published on The DNA. Read the <a href="https://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/column-bring-on-much-needed-onorc-2791050">original article</a>)

(Disclaimer: The opinions expressed above are the personal views of the author and do not reflect the views of ZMCL)&nbsp;

The public distribution system (PDS) constitutes a major thrust of India’s socio-economic policy, even before Independence. It stems from the effective accountability of the government to ensure that its citizens have access to food through its vast network of fair price shops.

The public distribution system (PDS) constitutes a major thrust of India’s socio-economic policy, even before Independence. It stems from the effective accountability of the government to ensure that its citizens have access to food through its vast network of fair price shops. The recent decision by the Union government to roll out `One Nation One Ration Card (ONORC)’ is an excellent initiative in that direction. This pan-India portability scheme seeks to enable PDS beneficiaries to get their quota of food grain from any ration shop of their choice across the country seamlessly. States like Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Haryana, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Kerala, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Telangana and Tripura have already executed the facilities for ration cardholders to shop anywhere across the state. The government seeks to achieve the important objective of food security for its citizens through the PDS at affordable prices, since providing food security to people stems from the concept of the welfare state, as enshrined in the Constitution of India. India, like many countries, subsidises the consumption of certain food and non-food items for the poor through a huge network of ration shops. Trouble is locational heterogeneity and complexity of social relations, which often create barriers to access PDS in India. The quality of services available in the PDS network is substantially inferior, riddled with corruption, pilferage, adulteration of grains, longer waiting time, sometimes even verbal abuse in the queue and so on. The PDS cries for urgent reforms both in terms of structural and administrative changes. The ONORC is one such reformative measure, which purports to shift the bargaining power from the PDS dealer to the beneficiaries since ONORC allows the latter to choose the PDS shop of his or her choice. India has the distinction of having the world’s largest food security programme. The government supplies five kg of subsidised food grain to each person per month to over 81 crore people via 5,00,000 ration shops across the country, costing the exchequer about Rs 1.4 lakh crore annually. Curiously, the present PDS system is location-linked, which often acts as a barrier to access food entitlements, especially, for migrant workers/families. The ONORC is expected to be far more inclusive and offer barrier-free access to food entitlements for the beneficiaries through the proposed ration card portability. The migrant workers are one of the largest groups (about 38% of India’s population), which face the artificial barrier of access to the PDS system and plethora of other social security schemes run by the Union and state governments. ‘One Nation, One Ration Card’ is governed by twin principles, i.e. linkage with Aadhar and digitalisation of ration cards to reach out to the real beneficiaries. However, the fear of exclusion of genuine beneficiaries due to the new system looms large, especially the migrators and their families or the left-behind families who stay back at the village. It is imperative that the ONORC should take its cue from the government’s National Health Insurance Scheme, which has a Unique Insurance Card to take care of the health care needs of both migrants as well as those left behind. The linkage of a ration card with a particular shop poses a major challenge for migrant workers, even though many states have allowed intra-state portability, which permits beneficiaries to buy rations from any fair price shops within that state. The ORORC, expected to launch throughout India by June 2020, is expected to address the portability issue. Even though it is a laudable initiative, it is going to face certain difficulties like lack of concrete data on migrant population/households, in so far as interstate migration is concerned. The archaic, domicile-based legislations governing access to social welfare schemes rolled out by the government, need to be amended to keep pace with the objectives of those schemes. The allocation of food grain needs to be made dynamic, commensurate with the flow of migrant population. Another issue likely to adversely affect the beneficiaries is differential entitlements offered by the states as well as the Union government. For example, many states are averse to the idea of granting equal benefits to the migrant population/families, like those granted to domiciled beneficiaries. Another pertinent issue could come up if members of a single household are split between two different locations. The guidelines of the scheme only permit the purchase of half the subsidised grain at one time in an effort to prevent one member of the household taking the entire ration for the month, thereby depriving rations to family members living in different locations. Policy makers and civil society have welcomed the move despite some bottlenecks palpably tagged with the system. There are multiple social security schemes, welfare-oriented schemes, food and poverty alleviation schemes implemented by the government, but the migrant labourers, SC/ST, and women remain the most vulnerable groups that are regularly being deprived of the benefits of the scheme. It is, therefore, imperative that the “One Nation One Ration Card” scheme needs to be more inclusive and offer better access to food at PDS destinations. This scheme also needs to be more technology-driven in place of the old manual method of record keeping. There is no contrarian point to argue the laudable vision of the grand scheme, but the operational complexities and the speculation of a threat to the federal structure, as raised by some political leaders, need to be ironed out systematically. (This article was originally published on The DNA. Read the original article) (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed above are the personal views of the author and do not reflect the views of ZMCL)

Bring on 'One Nation One Ration Card'

The recent judgment by the Supreme Court is well-intentioned and a bold attempt to address a grave issue concerning the health of citizens, especially the infants and the old. The court refused to impose a nationwide blanket ban on the manufacture and sale of firecrackers. However, it did not allow anything other than green crackers to be burst in the NCR region. It has fixed a time band of 8 pm to 10 pm — on Diwali and other festivities, including weddings for the bursting of firecrackers across the country. 
 
A separate time slot (11.55 pm to 12.30 am) has been allowed for bursting crackers during Christmas and New Year’s Eve celebration across the country. In addition, certain excessive polluting category of firecrackers have been banned along with the complete prohibition of online sale of crackers.

The apex court has tried to show environmental stewardship while dealing with the firecrackers issue though it has favoured a moderate use of crackers after its failure in controlling the sale and use of firecrackers last year. The core content of the SC order revolves around manufacturing and sale of “green crackers”. Surprisingly, the apex court has failed to inquire into a potent question, whether green crackers are manufactured in India or not? The answer is perhaps “no”. 
 
The concept of “green firecracker” is still in the embryonic stage. The Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) had come up with that idea but there is hardly any research on developing green crackers, nor is there any scientific, technical and socio-economic information available to understand the issue. Hence, the one way worth exploring is the importation of such green crackers from some foreign countries — if at all they are in use. They could be shipped to Indian in massive quantities.

Though the court has tried to balance various competing interests like those relating to the firecracker industry’s needs, the livelihood of workers, the rights of consumers, religious sentiments, environmental prerogatives and even the problems of local administrations, it is very difficult to strike a fine balance among the extremely contradictory and competing interests, and that is why it poses serious doubts on implementability of the court’s order. The last years’ experience speaks volume about it.

It is an undenying fact that bursting of firecrackers releases a heavy dose of carcinogens in the atmosphere, presenting a humongous public health challenge for Delhi and NCR regions. Though the executive wing is duty bound to ensure safe health by regulating the use of such polluting materials, its constant dereliction forces the courts to step in. Even the state governments are quite lethargic in fighting the pollution menace.

In the wake of the ban, the argument over the firecracker industry’s estimated loss of more than Rs 1,000 crore in the current year is not convincing in terms of the potentiality of health hazards. It is high time the firecrackers manufacturing sector ought to be persuaded to use the latest technology that reduces pollution. It is equally important to educate the people, especially children, about the threat to health posed by firecrackers. Campaigns over the years have yielded some dividends, however, there is a greater need to promote emancipatory environmentalism. We need to ponder over how the traditional value system of sustainability has been sacrificed at the altar of mindless consumerism and pomp, deliberately ignoring the long-term deleterious impact of such action.

The simplistic mass cultural extravaganza has gradually divorced itself from many traditional, religious and cultural specific aspects of the festival. It is used more as a potent marketing tool in cities diluting the essence of worship, honour and devotion to the divine. In fact, the literal meaning of Deepavali is “row of lamps” which projects the glorious past of our country that teaches us true values of our lives. That is being gradually fading in the face of loud firecrackers. The growing social awareness concerning emulating eco-friendly measures in every aspect of our life will lead to arresting the persistent dangers emanating from the bursting of crackers. It is hoped and believed that mass awareness for the love for our ecology will be the best tool against polluting firecrackers. 
 
(This article was originally published on DNA. Read the <a href="https://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/column-green-diwali-is-a-distant-dream-nurtured-by-eco-awareness-2683712">original article</a>)

(Disclaimer: The opinions expressed above are the personal views of the author and do not reflect the views of ZMCL)

The recent judgment by the Supreme Court is well-intentioned and a bold attempt to address a grave issue concerning the health of citizens, especially the infants and the old.

The recent judgment by the Supreme Court is well-intentioned and a bold attempt to address a grave issue concerning the health of citizens, especially the infants and the old. The court refused to impose a nationwide blanket ban on the manufacture and sale of firecrackers. However, it did not allow anything other than green crackers to be burst in the NCR region. It has fixed a time band of 8 pm to 10 pm — on Diwali and other festivities, including weddings for the bursting of firecrackers across the country. A separate time slot (11.55 pm to 12.30 am) has been allowed for bursting crackers during Christmas and New Year’s Eve celebration across the country. In addition, certain excessive polluting category of firecrackers have been banned along with the complete prohibition of online sale of crackers. The apex court has tried to show environmental stewardship while dealing with the firecrackers issue though it has favoured a moderate use of crackers after its failure in controlling the sale and use of firecrackers last year. The core content of the SC order revolves around manufacturing and sale of “green crackers”. Surprisingly, the apex court has failed to inquire into a potent question, whether green crackers are manufactured in India or not? The answer is perhaps “no”. The concept of “green firecracker” is still in the embryonic stage. The Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) had come up with that idea but there is hardly any research on developing green crackers, nor is there any scientific, technical and socio-economic information available to understand the issue. Hence, the one way worth exploring is the importation of such green crackers from some foreign countries — if at all they are in use. They could be shipped to Indian in massive quantities. Though the court has tried to balance various competing interests like those relating to the firecracker industry’s needs, the livelihood of workers, the rights of consumers, religious sentiments, environmental prerogatives and even the problems of local administrations, it is very difficult to strike a fine balance among the extremely contradictory and competing interests, and that is why it poses serious doubts on implementability of the court’s order. The last years’ experience speaks volume about it. It is an undenying fact that bursting of firecrackers releases a heavy dose of carcinogens in the atmosphere, presenting a humongous public health challenge for Delhi and NCR regions. Though the executive wing is duty bound to ensure safe health by regulating the use of such polluting materials, its constant dereliction forces the courts to step in. Even the state governments are quite lethargic in fighting the pollution menace. In the wake of the ban, the argument over the firecracker industry’s estimated loss of more than Rs 1,000 crore in the current year is not convincing in terms of the potentiality of health hazards. It is high time the firecrackers manufacturing sector ought to be persuaded to use the latest technology that reduces pollution. It is equally important to educate the people, especially children, about the threat to health posed by firecrackers. Campaigns over the years have yielded some dividends, however, there is a greater need to promote emancipatory environmentalism. We need to ponder over how the traditional value system of sustainability has been sacrificed at the altar of mindless consumerism and pomp, deliberately ignoring the long-term deleterious impact of such action. The simplistic mass cultural extravaganza has gradually divorced itself from many traditional, religious and cultural specific aspects of the festival. It is used more as a potent marketing tool in cities diluting the essence of worship, honour and devotion to the divine. In fact, the literal meaning of Deepavali is “row of lamps” which projects the glorious past of our country that teaches us true values of our lives. That is being gradually fading in the face of loud firecrackers. The growing social awareness concerning emulating eco-friendly measures in every aspect of our life will lead to arresting the persistent dangers emanating from the bursting of crackers. It is hoped and believed that mass awareness for the love for our ecology will be the best tool against polluting firecrackers. (This article was originally published on DNA. Read the original article) (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed above are the personal views of the author and do not reflect the views of ZMCL)

Green Diwali is a distant dream nurtured by eco-awareness

Author

Zee News Rajasthan

Editor

Sanjeeb Panigrahi

Home

Live Tv

Latest

World

India

Business

Entertainment

Sports

Opinions

Videos

Photos

Gravitas

Lifestyle

Science

Tech

Rajasthan News in Hindi: In-depth coverage of Rajasthan Crime, Political News, Education, Rajasthan Weather Update and Latest Rajasthan News on Zee News Rajasthan.