The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Foreign Ministers Meeting this month at Goa had an intense war of words. The SCO is a multilateral and multi-sectoral international organisation with eight member states- China, India, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Pakistan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. With the help of media statements, the tug-of-war between the foreign ministers of India and Pakistan continued. This was no surprise, the much-anticipated fireworks in the form of a speech act were done by both sides.&nbsp; 
 
India and Pakistan representatives were seen targeting each other on a variety of issues. Pakistan-sponsored terrorism continued to be at the centre stage. In the SCO meeting in Goa, External Affairs Minister (EAM) S. Jaishankar was seen as firm in his body language, pretty vocal and unapologetic about his remarks. Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari too was seen in the usual mode. The statements by the EAM Jaishankar and Pakistan Foreign Minister Bhutto were largely on the issues, where mutual targeting is well known between the two states: Kashmir, revocation of Article 370, Pakistan occupied Kashmir, Pakistan-sponsored cross-border terrorism etc.&nbsp;

ALSO READ | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/leading-the-way-for-world-indias-proposal-for-digital-public-infra-adopted-by-sco-members-592217">Leading the way for world: India's proposal for digital public infra adopted by SCO members</a>

<h2>Pak-sponsored terrorism: A brief glimpse</h2>

The Indian position on Pakistan’s role in spreading and nurturing international terror groups has long remained clear and constant. However, there is a notable change in the way India has approached the issues in recent times. “Pakistan’s credibility is depleting even faster than its forex reserves”. The External Affairs Minister of India, S. Jaishankar referred to the failing or depleting credibility of Pakistan, hinted&nbsp;towards the country’s long-continued hypocritic approach to state-grown terrorism. 
Islamabad has long continued to renounce that it has been supporting anti-India terror groups from its soil. India has now stopped pleading and providing Pakistan with evidence of its involvement in anti-India activities. In its present stance, under the leadership of Prime Minister Modi, New Delhi has ceased to engage Islamabad in the usual fashion. 
For decades, India has overlooked and pardoned many sub-conventional strikes sponsored by Pakistan. But it has now largely ceased giving oneway, unilateral concessions to Pakistan by overlooking its faults like an elder brother and regional power in South Asia. In the Goa meeting too, like old wine in a new bottle, Pakistan restated the lie India has been told several times both bilaterally and internationally, that it is a sufferer and not a perpetrator of terrorism. &nbsp;

India was in no mood to be fooled yet again. Even after having fought four major conventional wars with Pakistan, India has several times attempted reconciliation. Largely all these conventional wars or conflicts were initiated by Pakistan. On several occasions, India has caught Pakistan red-handed with strong evidence of the ISI's involvement in sub-conventional strikes or anti-India terror attacks including the Parliament attack, 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks etc. India has also presented evidence of the role of institutions in Pakistan in the same, but it continued to deny and overlook it. In&nbsp;recent months there have been many Pak-sponsored attacks in Kashmir, in the most recent one resulted in the martyrdom of five security personnel in Rajouri district which unfortunately happened simultaneously to the Goa SCO meet on 5th May, 2023.&nbsp;

Pakistan from the Cold War times till date has continued on its approach and has given a blind eye to homegrown terrorism. It has taken no action to counter and contain the anti-India terror elements operating from its soil. The ISI and some major of Pakistan’s institutions have supported and are fond of the “good Taliban” &nbsp;and this is now an open secret to the world that Pakistan shelters terrorists. The killing of the Al Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden in 2012 by the US forces in his own compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan; made the world know about the Pakistan government’s hand in sheltering global terrorists.&nbsp;

WATCH | SCO summit 2023: India holds chair of G20 &amp; SCO this year | World News | WION

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/sco-summit-2023-india-holds-chair-of-g20-sco-this-year-world-news-wion-589210/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2>Is the war of words at SCO meeting justified?</h2>

The SCO meet at Goa in May, 2023 was an important occasion for New Delhi and Islamabad. Not surprising that both countries arranged no bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the multilateral meeting. Mr. Jaishankar stated that “the victims of terrorism do not sit together with perpetrators of terrorism to discuss terrorism” with the Foreign Minister of Pakistan referred by him as a “promoter, justifier and a spokesperson” of the terror industry. 
The war of words between New Delhi and Islamabad is nothing new but many international political analysts believe that it could&nbsp;have been avoided in a multilateral set-up. However, it must be noted that the issue under discussion- terrorism, falls well inside the core agenda of the SCO and the discussion on the matter brought for the role of one member state in perpetuating, harbouring and proliferating terrorism. 
The United Nations define the SCO as an organisation which since its inception has focused on regional security issues, with a well-known priority combating “regional terrorism, ethnic separatism and religious extremism”. However, in recent decades SCO has also diversified its agenda adding and prioritising regional development, cooperation in the realm of science and technology, environmental protection etc. Thus, it has emerged as a regional organisation with multi-faceted objectives of promoting diverse political, economic, technical and people-to-people cooperation.&nbsp;

<h2>What does this mean for India’s policy towards Pakistan?&nbsp;</h2>

The Pakistan Foreign Minister in December 2022 at the United Nations in an interaction with the media, was seen referring to the Prime Minister of India as ‘butcher of Gujarat’. It must be noted that the Indian EAM’s statements and responses to the press on the matter of Pakistan did not come as an immediate and instantaneous response. Mr. Jaishankar's statements were much more than a tirade and invective speech act. It was part of a bigger response signalling a changed approach of India to one of its neighbouring state which over the years has caused it deliberate harm in more than one way. &nbsp; 
There is a clear observation. The tug of war between India and Pakistan at the sidelines of a multilateral forum SCO hints towards a more aggressive approach of India to name, shame and blame Pakistan for its anti-India activities. Though both states have been pointing fingers at each other, kind of ritualistically, every year at the United Nations General Assembly. But now, it is visible that India has gone more vocal on the long-due matter of cross-border and Pakistan-sponsored terrorism. 
The same has not only harmed&nbsp;Indian interests but also has been detrimental to South Asian stability and global peace. The analysis suggests that the long due reconciliation and strengthening of ties between India and Pakistan is difficult unless provocative actions are halted from the side of the Islamic state.

(Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.)

You can&nbsp;now write for wionews.com&nbsp;and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Foreign Ministers Meeting this month at Goa had an intense war of words. The SCO is a multilateral and multi-sectoral international organisation with eight member states- China, India, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Pakistan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.

The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Foreign Ministers Meeting this month at Goa had an intense war of words. The SCO is a multilateral and multi-sectoral international organisation with eight member states- China, India, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Pakistan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. With the help of media statements, the tug-of-war between the foreign ministers of India and Pakistan continued. This was no surprise, the much-anticipated fireworks in the form of a speech act were done by both sides. India and Pakistan representatives were seen targeting each other on a variety of issues. Pakistan-sponsored terrorism continued to be at the centre stage. In the SCO meeting in Goa, External Affairs Minister (EAM) S. Jaishankar was seen as firm in his body language, pretty vocal and unapologetic about his remarks. Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari too was seen in the usual mode. The statements by the EAM Jaishankar and Pakistan Foreign Minister Bhutto were largely on the issues, where mutual targeting is well known between the two states: Kashmir, revocation of Article 370, Pakistan occupied Kashmir, Pakistan-sponsored cross-border terrorism etc. ALSO READ | Leading the way for world: India's proposal for digital public infra adopted by SCO members Pak-sponsored terrorism: A brief glimpse The Indian position on Pakistan’s role in spreading and nurturing international terror groups has long remained clear and constant. However, there is a notable change in the way India has approached the issues in recent times. “Pakistan’s credibility is depleting even faster than its forex reserves”. The External Affairs Minister of India, S. Jaishankar referred to the failing or depleting credibility of Pakistan, hinted towards the country’s long-continued hypocritic approach to state-grown terrorism. Islamabad has long continued to renounce that it has been supporting anti-India terror groups from its soil. India has now stopped pleading and providing Pakistan with evidence of its involvement in anti-India activities. In its present stance, under the leadership of Prime Minister Modi, New Delhi has ceased to engage Islamabad in the usual fashion. For decades, India has overlooked and pardoned many sub-conventional strikes sponsored by Pakistan. But it has now largely ceased giving oneway, unilateral concessions to Pakistan by overlooking its faults like an elder brother and regional power in South Asia. In the Goa meeting too, like old wine in a new bottle, Pakistan restated the lie India has been told several times both bilaterally and internationally, that it is a sufferer and not a perpetrator of terrorism. India was in no mood to be fooled yet again. Even after having fought four major conventional wars with Pakistan, India has several times attempted reconciliation. Largely all these conventional wars or conflicts were initiated by Pakistan. On several occasions, India has caught Pakistan red-handed with strong evidence of the ISI's involvement in sub-conventional strikes or anti-India terror attacks including the Parliament attack, 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks etc. India has also presented evidence of the role of institutions in Pakistan in the same, but it continued to deny and overlook it. In recent months there have been many Pak-sponsored attacks in Kashmir, in the most recent one resulted in the martyrdom of five security personnel in Rajouri district which unfortunately happened simultaneously to the Goa SCO meet on 5th May, 2023. Pakistan from the Cold War times till date has continued on its approach and has given a blind eye to homegrown terrorism. It has taken no action to counter and contain the anti-India terror elements operating from its soil. The ISI and some major of Pakistan’s institutions have supported and are fond of the “good Taliban” and this is now an open secret to the world that Pakistan shelters terrorists. The killing of the Al Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden in 2012 by the US forces in his own compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan; made the world know about the Pakistan government’s hand in sheltering global terrorists. WATCH | SCO summit 2023: India holds chair of G20 & SCO this year | World News | WION Is the war of words at SCO meeting justified? The SCO meet at Goa in May, 2023 was an important occasion for New Delhi and Islamabad. Not surprising that both countries arranged no bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the multilateral meeting. Mr. Jaishankar stated that “the victims of terrorism do not sit together with perpetrators of terrorism to discuss terrorism” with the Foreign Minister of Pakistan referred by him as a “promoter, justifier and a spokesperson” of the terror industry. The war of words between New Delhi and Islamabad is nothing new but many international political analysts believe that it could have been avoided in a multilateral set-up. However, it must be noted that the issue under discussion- terrorism, falls well inside the core agenda of the SCO and the discussion on the matter brought for the role of one member state in perpetuating, harbouring and proliferating terrorism. The United Nations define the SCO as an organisation which since its inception has focused on regional security issues, with a well-known priority combating “regional terrorism, ethnic separatism and religious extremism”. However, in recent decades SCO has also diversified its agenda adding and prioritising regional development, cooperation in the realm of science and technology, environmental protection etc. Thus, it has emerged as a regional organisation with multi-faceted objectives of promoting diverse political, economic, technical and people-to-people cooperation. What does this mean for India’s policy towards Pakistan? The Pakistan Foreign Minister in December 2022 at the United Nations in an interaction with the media, was seen referring to the Prime Minister of India as ‘butcher of Gujarat’. It must be noted that the Indian EAM’s statements and responses to the press on the matter of Pakistan did not come as an immediate and instantaneous response. Mr. Jaishankar's statements were much more than a tirade and invective speech act. It was part of a bigger response signalling a changed approach of India to one of its neighbouring state which over the years has caused it deliberate harm in more than one way. There is a clear observation. The tug of war between India and Pakistan at the sidelines of a multilateral forum SCO hints towards a more aggressive approach of India to name, shame and blame Pakistan for its anti-India activities. Though both states have been pointing fingers at each other, kind of ritualistically, every year at the United Nations General Assembly. But now, it is visible that India has gone more vocal on the long-due matter of cross-border and Pakistan-sponsored terrorism. The same has not only harmed Indian interests but also has been detrimental to South Asian stability and global peace. The analysis suggests that the long due reconciliation and strengthening of ties between India and Pakistan is difficult unless provocative actions are halted from the side of the Islamic state. (Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.) You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here. WATCH WION LIVE HERE

Pakistan-sponsored terrorism: Understanding India's reaction at SCO Goa meet

It has been a turbulent year so far for Sri Lanka with the island states’ worst fears being realised. The present economic crisis was in the making for a few years owing to Sri Lanka’s bad political decisions and policies, ill-effects of over-centralisation of leadership even at the cost of weakening of democratic institutions, deficient future economic planning, opportunism of lender countries like China. The result was a situation of grave foreign exchange shortage, leading to a record high level of inflation and a scarcity of essentials to citizens including, fuel, food and medicines.

With President Gotabaya Rajapaksa abandoning citizens and fleeing to Singapore, followed by his resignation, there remains no doubt that the social and political unrest in the state is here to stay and the disturbing images of protesters storming the Presidential house and government offices and days-long ques outside fuel pumps are not exaggerations but a genuine depiction of the chaos.

Sri Lanka thus finds itself amidst a whirlpool. These strong currents which are pulling Sri Lanka further into the storm, call for a strong, strategic and well-crafted reaction from India in the given situation. India is a leading country in the South Asia region and an immediate neighbour having a historically cordial relationship with Sri Lanka.

What should be the Indian reaction?

India as a leading civilisational power in the region. It not just has a strategic requirement and national interest reasons but also a greater moral responsibility to act when an immediate neighbour is in crisis. External Affairs Minister, S Jaishankar pointed this out earlier in July that the present economic and political crisis “pertains to a very close neighbour and, given the near proximity, we naturally worry about the consequences, the spillover it has for us”.

India ought to have twin goals in the given situation where Sri Lanka is not just encountering a political instability but a grave shortage of foreign exchange reserves which has led to the country struggling to pay for essential imports.

First, to provide maximum possible assistance and support to Sri Lanka. This would serve two purposes, to save the Sri Lankan democracy and its vibrant institutions and governance record from degenerating into a politically, economically and socially disturbed state in the years to come. It is certainly not in the Indian national interest to have another neighbouring state, after the unpleasant experiences from Afghanistan, Pakistan and Myanmar, to becoming hotbed of notorious non-state actors, non-democratic regimes and overall socio-economic turmoil.

After all, not many decades ago India had to cater to the refugees from Sri Lanka, send the rather controversial peacekeeping mission to the state between 1987 and 1990 and the in later years after the conclusion of the Sri Lankan civil war send aid. India provided aid for the rehabilitation of numerous Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs), the Sri Lankan Tamils uprooted due to the situation emanating from a prolonged civil war in Sri Lanka.

Answering a question in the Parliament, inquiring whether India is taking any steps/measures to help Sri Lanka from the unprecedented crisis, the Minister of State in the Ministry of External Affairs, V. Muraleedharan cited the details of India’s continued support and efforts to the economic development of the people of Sri Lanka in overcoming the economic challenges.

He stated that, early this year “India extended a US$ 400 million currency swap to Sri Lanka under the SAARC Framework and deferred successive Asian Clearing Union (A.C.U.) settlements. India also offered a Line of Credit of US$ 500 million for the purpose of fuel import from India. A credit facility of US$ 1 billion has been introduced to help Sri Lanka procure food, medicines and other essential items from India. There was also a humanitarian assistance or gift of essential medicines, kerosene oil and Urea fertilizer.”

Another crucial purpose the Indian support would serve would be in proving the domestic critics of the Modi government’s foreign policy wrong. There has been criticism that the government of India in recent years has not prioritised the maintenance of healthy bilateral relationships in the neighbourhood, especially with smaller states in South Asia like Nepal etc.

Brushing aside the recent criticisms based on a report stating that Sri Lanka in 2020 had requested India for a debt deferral, the EAM Jaishankar said that, no formal request had been made for help earlier, thus the Indian assistance could not be termed as “too little too late” in this case.

The Sri Lanka crisis has given the Indian government led by PM Modi a good opportunity to strengthen it’s ‘neighbourhood first policy’ and display how the policy could be implemented and be widely seen in action. With India committing a $3.8 billion for the support of Sri Lanka, EAM Jaishankar reiterated that the Prime Minister is committed to its neighbourhood first policy where the government makes special efforts to try and support the country’s neighbours in a manner that meets their requirements.

Indian commitment to, as V. Muraleedharan mentions, support the quest of the people of Sri Lanka for stability and economic recovery, through established democratic norms, institutions and constitutional framework, remains firm.

A second goal for India and notably of equal importance is to name and shame the PRC. This would build diplomatic pressure on PRC and attract international attention and probably later invite international condemnation towards the ‘by-design’, ‘ill-intended’ bad loans China offers to many developing states like Sri Lanka.

Since 2019, there has been an overall decline in the Sri Lanka’s foreign reserves and a record increase in the external debt. China alone has making around 10% of the total debt, what Jaishankar calls as an “unsustainable debt”, of approximately $34.6 billion.

ANI reports that as per a study last year&nbsp;by two Sri Lankan economists, the “official data from the Sri Lanka’s Finance Ministry showing it as 10% might just cater to the government-to-government debt. And the commercial lending to the government and loans to Sri-Lankan state owned enterprises”. For instance, in the case of the Hambantota Port development, China enveloped Sri Lanka into an unequal deal with a controversial 99-year lease contract. Sri Lanka defaulted and had issues with the repayment of the loan and eventually lost control over its own port.

China has aimed to destabilize many Asian and African economies in the past with its ‘debt traps’. It is one of the biggest investors in various infrastructure projects in Sri Lanka though there has been both domestic and international concerns about China luring Sri Lanka into a debt trap.

However, it must be acknowledged that several reasons proliferating the recent economic and political crisis in Sri Lanka have internal or domestic causes, yet the role of China in the present turmoil could not be completely overlooked. Many political and economic analysts believe that the Sri Lankan crisis could not be seen as a bolt from the blue or unprecedented as there was in making from some years now owing to Sri Lanka’s bad political choices and poor economic planning.

To conclude, for Prime Minister Modi’s ‘Neighbourhood First Policy’ to be seen in action, the politico-economic crisis in Sri Lanka presents a ripe moment for India where it could act and assist the state in every possible manner.

Apart from the several strategic benefits, what India could draw from this crisis would be to emerge as a strong state in the region and provide a support system for many SAARC and the BIMSTEC member states. There is a vacuum for a leadership role for the fraternity of states which have borrowed heavily based on contracts and conditions designed by Beijing. Many of these economies are in ‘debt traps’ with their economies already showing the signs of strains. India is known for its soft power credentials and in Sri Lankan recovery that support from India is paramount.

The author is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science, Lady Shri Ram College for Women, University of Delhi.

(Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.)

It has been a turbulent year so far for Sri Lanka with the island states’ worst fears being realised. The present economic crisis was in the making for a few years owing to Sri Lanka’s bad political decisions and policies, ill-effects of over-centralisation of leadership even at the cost of weakening of democratic institutions, deficient future economic planning, opportunism of lender countries like China.

It has been a turbulent year so far for Sri Lanka with the island states’ worst fears being realised. The present economic crisis was in the making for a few years owing to Sri Lanka’s bad political decisions and policies, ill-effects of over-centralisation of leadership even at the cost of weakening of democratic institutions, deficient future economic planning, opportunism of lender countries like China. The result was a situation of grave foreign exchange shortage, leading to a record high level of inflation and a scarcity of essentials to citizens including, fuel, food and medicines. With President Gotabaya Rajapaksa abandoning citizens and fleeing to Singapore, followed by his resignation, there remains no doubt that the social and political unrest in the state is here to stay and the disturbing images of protesters storming the Presidential house and government offices and days-long ques outside fuel pumps are not exaggerations but a genuine depiction of the chaos. Sri Lanka thus finds itself amidst a whirlpool. These strong currents which are pulling Sri Lanka further into the storm, call for a strong, strategic and well-crafted reaction from India in the given situation. India is a leading country in the South Asia region and an immediate neighbour having a historically cordial relationship with Sri Lanka. What should be the Indian reaction? India as a leading civilisational power in the region. It not just has a strategic requirement and national interest reasons but also a greater moral responsibility to act when an immediate neighbour is in crisis. External Affairs Minister, S Jaishankar pointed this out earlier in July that the present economic and political crisis “pertains to a very close neighbour and, given the near proximity, we naturally worry about the consequences, the spillover it has for us”. India ought to have twin goals in the given situation where Sri Lanka is not just encountering a political instability but a grave shortage of foreign exchange reserves which has led to the country struggling to pay for essential imports. First, to provide maximum possible assistance and support to Sri Lanka. This would serve two purposes, to save the Sri Lankan democracy and its vibrant institutions and governance record from degenerating into a politically, economically and socially disturbed state in the years to come. It is certainly not in the Indian national interest to have another neighbouring state, after the unpleasant experiences from Afghanistan, Pakistan and Myanmar, to becoming hotbed of notorious non-state actors, non-democratic regimes and overall socio-economic turmoil. After all, not many decades ago India had to cater to the refugees from Sri Lanka, send the rather controversial peacekeeping mission to the state between 1987 and 1990 and the in later years after the conclusion of the Sri Lankan civil war send aid. India provided aid for the rehabilitation of numerous Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs), the Sri Lankan Tamils uprooted due to the situation emanating from a prolonged civil war in Sri Lanka. Answering a question in the Parliament, inquiring whether India is taking any steps/measures to help Sri Lanka from the unprecedented crisis, the Minister of State in the Ministry of External Affairs, V. Muraleedharan cited the details of India’s continued support and efforts to the economic development of the people of Sri Lanka in overcoming the economic challenges. He stated that, early this year “India extended a US$ 400 million currency swap to Sri Lanka under the SAARC Framework and deferred successive Asian Clearing Union (A.C.U.) settlements. India also offered a Line of Credit of US$ 500 million for the purpose of fuel import from India. A credit facility of US$ 1 billion has been introduced to help Sri Lanka procure food, medicines and other essential items from India. There was also a humanitarian assistance or gift of essential medicines, kerosene oil and Urea fertilizer.” Another crucial purpose the Indian support would serve would be in proving the domestic critics of the Modi government’s foreign policy wrong. There has been criticism that the government of India in recent years has not prioritised the maintenance of healthy bilateral relationships in the neighbourhood, especially with smaller states in South Asia like Nepal etc. Brushing aside the recent criticisms based on a report stating that Sri Lanka in 2020 had requested India for a debt deferral, the EAM Jaishankar said that, no formal request had been made for help earlier, thus the Indian assistance could not be termed as “too little too late” in this case. The Sri Lanka crisis has given the Indian government led by PM Modi a good opportunity to strengthen it’s ‘neighbourhood first policy’ and display how the policy could be implemented and be widely seen in action. With India committing a $3.8 billion for the support of Sri Lanka, EAM Jaishankar reiterated that the Prime Minister is committed to its neighbourhood first policy where the government makes special efforts to try and support the country’s neighbours in a manner that meets their requirements. Indian commitment to, as V. Muraleedharan mentions, support the quest of the people of Sri Lanka for stability and economic recovery, through established democratic norms, institutions and constitutional framework, remains firm. A second goal for India and notably of equal importance is to name and shame the PRC. This would build diplomatic pressure on PRC and attract international attention and probably later invite international condemnation towards the ‘by-design’, ‘ill-intended’ bad loans China offers to many developing states like Sri Lanka. Since 2019, there has been an overall decline in the Sri Lanka’s foreign reserves and a record increase in the external debt. China alone has making around 10% of the total debt, what Jaishankar calls as an “unsustainable debt”, of approximately $34.6 billion. ANI reports that as per a study last year by two Sri Lankan economists, the “official data from the Sri Lanka’s Finance Ministry showing it as 10% might just cater to the government-to-government debt. And the commercial lending to the government and loans to Sri-Lankan state owned enterprises”. For instance, in the case of the Hambantota Port development, China enveloped Sri Lanka into an unequal deal with a controversial 99-year lease contract. Sri Lanka defaulted and had issues with the repayment of the loan and eventually lost control over its own port. China has aimed to destabilize many Asian and African economies in the past with its ‘debt traps’. It is one of the biggest investors in various infrastructure projects in Sri Lanka though there has been both domestic and international concerns about China luring Sri Lanka into a debt trap. However, it must be acknowledged that several reasons proliferating the recent economic and political crisis in Sri Lanka have internal or domestic causes, yet the role of China in the present turmoil could not be completely overlooked. Many political and economic analysts believe that the Sri Lankan crisis could not be seen as a bolt from the blue or unprecedented as there was in making from some years now owing to Sri Lanka’s bad political choices and poor economic planning. To conclude, for Prime Minister Modi’s ‘Neighbourhood First Policy’ to be seen in action, the politico-economic crisis in Sri Lanka presents a ripe moment for India where it could act and assist the state in every possible manner. Apart from the several strategic benefits, what India could draw from this crisis would be to emerge as a strong state in the region and provide a support system for many SAARC and the BIMSTEC member states. There is a vacuum for a leadership role for the fraternity of states which have borrowed heavily based on contracts and conditions designed by Beijing. Many of these economies are in ‘debt traps’ with their economies already showing the signs of strains. India is known for its soft power credentials and in Sri Lankan recovery that support from India is paramount. The author is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science, Lady Shri Ram College for Women, University of Delhi. (Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.)

Sri Lanka at crossroads; how should India react?

Author

Zee News Rajasthan

Editor

Dr Manisha Chaurasiya

Home

Live Tv

Latest

World

India

Business

Entertainment

Sports

Opinions

Videos

Photos

Gravitas

Lifestyle

Science

Tech

Rajasthan News in Hindi: In-depth coverage of Rajasthan Crime, Political News, Education, Rajasthan Weather Update and Latest Rajasthan News on Zee News Rajasthan.