<p>Following the backlash received over Mohan Bhagwat`s alleged disrespectful statement against the Indian army, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) on Monday said that his speech was being misrepresented.</p>

<p>Also read:<a href="http://www.wionews.com/india-news/rahul-gandhi-hits-out-at-rss-chief-for-insulting-army-32572"> Rahul Gandhi hits out at RSS chief for &#39;insulting&#39; army</a></p>

<p>A statement issued by Akhil Bharatiya Prachar Pramukh, Manmohan Vaidya, read, &quot;Bhagwat ji had said that if situation arises and the Constitution permits, Indian army would take six months to prepare the society whereas Sangh Swayamsevaks can be trained in three days, as Swayamsevaks practise discipline regularly.&quot;</p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="row">
<div class="article-blockquote">
<div class="col-sm-10 col-sm-offset-1 blockquote-content quoteshare">
<blockquote>
<h5>Bhagwat ji had said that if situation arises and the Constitution permits, Indian army would take six months to prepare the society whereas Sangh Swayamsevaks can be trained in three days, as Swayamsevaks practise discipline regularly&#39;</h5>
</blockquote>
</div>

<div class="col-sm-1 blockquote-content">
<div class="share-blockquote"><a class="twitter popup" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Bhagwat ji had said that if situation arises and the Constitution permits, Indian army would take six months to prepare the society whereas Sangh Swayamsevaks can be trained in three days, as Swayamsevaks practise discipline regularly'" target="_blank"><i class="fa fa-share">&nbsp;</i></a></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqquoteclosemark">&times;</a></div>
</div>
</div>

<p>To this effect, Vaidya added, the statement was not a comparison between the Indian army and the Sangh Swayamsevaks, but a comparison between general society and swayamsevaks, when given the opportunity to be trained by the Indian Army.</p>

<p>Bhagwat`s statement sparked an outrage on social media following his speech in Bihar`s Muzaffarpur where he was reported to have said that RSS was capable of preparing military personnel in three days for which the Indian Army would take six to seven months.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>


The RSS said Bhagwat's statement was not a comparison between the Indian Army and swayamsevaks but a comparison between society and swayamsevaks

Following the backlash received over Mohan Bhagwat`s alleged disrespectful statement against the Indian army, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) on Monday said that his speech was being misrepresented. Also read: Rahul Gandhi hits out at RSS chief for 'insulting' army A statement issued by Akhil Bharatiya Prachar Pramukh, Manmohan Vaidya, read, "Bhagwat ji had said that if situation arises and the Constitution permits, Indian army would take six months to prepare the society whereas Sangh Swayamsevaks can be trained in three days, as Swayamsevaks practise discipline regularly." Bhagwat ji had said that if situation arises and the Constitution permits, Indian army would take six months to prepare the society whereas Sangh Swayamsevaks can be trained in three days, as Swayamsevaks practise discipline regularly' × To this effect, Vaidya added, the statement was not a comparison between the Indian army and the Sangh Swayamsevaks, but a comparison between general society and swayamsevaks, when given the opportunity to be trained by the Indian Army. Bhagwat`s statement sparked an outrage on social media following his speech in Bihar`s Muzaffarpur where he was reported to have said that RSS was capable of preparing military personnel in three days for which the Indian Army would take six to seven months.

Bhagwat's speech being misrepresented: RSS

parivarik-organisation

Parivarik Organisation, News on Parivarik Organisation, stories on Parivarik Organisation, articles on Parivarik Organisation, Parivarik Organisation stories at Wion, Parivarik Organisation news, Parivarik Organisation latest news

parivarik organisation

Bhagwat's speech being misrepresented: RSS