Elon Musk's artificial intelligence company xAI has filed a lawsuit against the US state of Minnesota over a first-in-the-nation law that bans AI "nudification" technology on websites and apps. The lawsuit, filed in federal court on Monday, comes just days before the Minnesota law is scheduled to take effect on August 1. The legislation, signed into law in May, makes Minnesota the first US state to directly target AI tools capable of generating fake nude images of real people.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/elon-musk-asks-users-if-they-can-break-grok-ai-moderation-x-responds-by-putting-him-in-bikinis-and-more-1768467434756">Elon Musk asks internet to test Grok's moderation, X chooses violence — and bikinis</a><h2>What does xAI have against the law preventing non-consensual 'nudification' of young girls?</h2>In its 38-page complaint, xAI argued that while it supports efforts to curb the non-consensual distribution of AI-generated nude images, Minnesota's law goes much further than necessary.The company contends the law could ban constitutionally protected images and videos and expose AI developers to penalties of up to $500,000 per violation. According to the lawsuit, the legislation lacks a "safe harbour" provision that would protect companies making good-faith efforts to prevent misuse of their AI tools.It also argues the law could apply to images created with the consent of the person depicted, or even images generated by the individual themselves. xAI further claims the law's definition of "intimate part" is overly broad, potentially covering body parts commonly visible in public.<h2>Minnesota slams ‘appalling’ use of tech</h2>Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison said his office had not yet been served with the lawsuit but defended the legislation. "Using AI to generate nude images of people against their will is appalling," Ellison said in a statement.“There are plenty of worthy debates to have about AI policy. This is not one of them. AI nudification robs the target of their dignity and can cause immense harm on an emotional, personal and professional level.”Unlike most state and federal deepfake laws, which punish people who create or distribute non-consensual explicit images, Minnesota's law places legal responsibility on companies that provide the AI tools themselves.<h2>xAI points to existing safeguards</h2>The company said its AI chatbot and image generator Grok, available through X and other platforms, already prohibits users from creating non-consensual nude or sexually explicit images. According to xAI, users who violate those rules can face account suspension or termination, while suspected child sexual abuse material is reported to authorities.Notably, in December 2025, <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/elon-musk-pokes-fun-at-x-s-exploitative-bikini-trend-even-as-grok-ai-says-deeply-regret-creating-sexualised-images-of-a-12-year-old-girl-1767417683927">Grok apologised for “depicting minors in minimal clothing”</a> after uproar over an “AI image of two young girls (estimated ages 12-16) in sexualized attire based on a user’s prompt”.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/elon-musk-pokes-fun-at-x-s-exploitative-bikini-trend-even-as-grok-ai-says-deeply-regret-creating-sexualised-images-of-a-12-year-old-girl-1767417683927">Musk pokes fun at X's exploitative 'bikini' trend, even as Grok AI says 'deeply regret' creating sexualised images of a 12YO girl</a>Earlier this year, the company also announced a "zero tolerance" policy toward child sexual exploitation, non-consensual nudity and unwanted sexual content. Following global criticism over sexually explicit AI-generated images, xAI said in January it introduced geo-blocking measures to prevent users in jurisdictions where such content is illegal from editing images of real people wearing revealing clothing. &nbsp;

Elon Musk's xAI has sued Minnesota over a first-in-the-nation law targeting AI nudification tools, arguing the legislation is overly broad, threatens constitutionally protected content and unfairly holds AI developers liable. All you need to know.

Elon Musk's artificial intelligence company xAI has filed a lawsuit against the US state of Minnesota over a first-in-the-nation law that bans AI "nudification" technology on websites and apps. The lawsuit, filed in federal court on Monday, comes just days before the Minnesota law is scheduled to take effect on August 1. The legislation, signed into law in May, makes Minnesota the first US state to directly target AI tools capable of generating fake nude images of real people. Also read | Elon Musk asks internet to test Grok's moderation, X chooses violence — and bikinis What does xAI have against the law preventing non-consensual 'nudification' of young girls? In its 38-page complaint, xAI argued that while it supports efforts to curb the non-consensual distribution of AI-generated nude images, Minnesota's law goes much further than necessary. The company contends the law could ban constitutionally protected images and videos and expose AI developers to penalties of up to $500,000 per violation. According to the lawsuit, the legislation lacks a "safe harbour" provision that would protect companies making good-faith efforts to prevent misuse of their AI tools. It also argues the law could apply to images created with the consent of the person depicted, or even images generated by the individual themselves. xAI further claims the law's definition of "intimate part" is overly broad, potentially covering body parts commonly visible in public. Minnesota slams ‘appalling’ use of tech Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison said his office had not yet been served with the lawsuit but defended the legislation. "Using AI to generate nude images of people against their will is appalling," Ellison said in a statement. “There are plenty of worthy debates to have about AI policy. This is not one of them. AI nudification robs the target of their dignity and can cause immense harm on an emotional, personal and professional level.” Unlike most state and federal deepfake laws, which punish people who create or distribute non-consensual explicit images, Minnesota's law places legal responsibility on companies that provide the AI tools themselves. xAI points to existing safeguards The company said its AI chatbot and image generator Grok, available through X and other platforms, already prohibits users from creating non-consensual nude or sexually explicit images. According to xAI, users who violate those rules can face account suspension or termination, while suspected child sexual abuse material is reported to authorities. Notably, in December 2025, Grok apologised for “depicting minors in minimal clothing” after uproar over an “AI image of two young girls (estimated ages 12-16) in sexualized attire based on a user’s prompt”. Also read | Musk pokes fun at X's exploitative 'bikini' trend, even as Grok AI says 'deeply regret' creating sexualised images of a 12YO girl Earlier this year, the company also announced a "zero tolerance" policy toward child sexual exploitation, non-consensual nudity and unwanted sexual content. Following global criticism over sexually explicit AI-generated images, xAI said in January it introduced geo-blocking measures to prevent users in jurisdictions where such content is illegal from editing images of real people wearing revealing clothing.

Elon Musk's xAI has sued Minnesota over a first-in-the-nation law targeting AI nudification tools, arguing the legislation is overly broad, threatens constitutionally protected content and unfairly holds AI developers liable. All you need to know.

Elon Musk's xAI sues Minnesota over a law banning AI nude images of children, claims it violates free speech

Elon Musk's artificial intelligence platform xAI has filed a motion requesting a federal court to force the disclosure of the identity of the four plaintiffs, as reported by Wired, based on the recently filed court documents. The four plaintiffs, identified as South Carolina Doe, South Carolina Roe, New Jersey Doe, and Ohio Doe, alleged that the xAI's Grok chatbot was used to create deepfake sexualised images and was circulated. Among the four plaintiffs, one of them is a minor. This follows an uproar caused in January when scores of men likely used the Grok chatbot to create fake images of women, including children, “undressed” and in bikinis.According to an Analysis from the Centre for Countering Digital Hate, Grok was used to create 3 million sexualised images over just 11 days, among which 23,000 were potentially material of child sexual abuse. The analysis formed the evidentiary backbone of the litigation, demonstrating the lack of a guardrail in Musk's chatbot.In an affidavit on May 29, the four plaintiffs who filed the class-action lawsuit alleged that they faced emotional distress following the images were created. They further fear online harassment and doxing if their real names are used in the lawsuit. They worry about what their colleagues or employers would think if they saw those images. The South Carolina Doe said that she was “stripped down to a revealing bikini” and it shows her body “in a way that I would not ever share publicly.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-iran-war-us-iran-talks-smaller-strikes-report-1780559571746">'Ceasefire' is 'moderate shooting'- Trump says he won't resume full scale war if Tehran does not kill US troops</a>“If I were forced to reveal my name publicly as part of this case, I would fear that those who support Elon Musk, his companies, and Grok, whom I have observed to be very vocal online, would find my name in the public record, disseminate it, dox me, and retaliate against me by creating additional and more extreme deepfakes of me,” read the filing as reported by Wired.“Having stripped them of their clothes, xAI now seeks to strip Plaintiffs of their pseudonyms in an obvious effort to intimidate Plaintiffs into dropping the litigation by compounding the same harms that they seek to remedy,” &nbsp;said Sophia Rios, a lawyer representing the individuals for the legal firm Berger Montague.&nbsp;A judge in the US District Court of Southern California allowed the complainant to use pseudonyms. But in May, xAI filed a motion with the federal court, urging them to disclose their names under civil court laws. Those who are suing the xAI have said that they will disclose the identity to the organisation but want to use the pseudonym publicly. xAI claims that there is a public interest in the identities of those who are suing the company. They further claim that since those deepfake images will not be made public as part of the case, this should allay any privacy concerns.&nbsp;“Factoring out the deepfake image itself—as it will remain under seal—there is nothing inherently stigmatising about revealing the fact that a deepfake image was created of South Carolina Doe without revealing the image itself,” the lawyers wrote in the May 15 filings.The lawyers of the complainant say that the images were “highly personal and embarrassing deepfakes depicting Plaintiffs that were disseminated without their consent.” They say that xAI's requests should be declined. According to the legal filing, all four pseudonyms of the claimants will drop out of the proceedings if their names are disclosed.&nbsp;

Elon Musk's xAI has asked a federal court to reveal the identities of four plaintiffs suing over Grok-generated sexualised deepfakes. The plaintiffs argue that disclosure could expose them to harassment and doxing.

Elon Musk's artificial intelligence platform xAI has filed a motion requesting a federal court to force the disclosure of the identity of the four plaintiffs, as reported by Wired, based on the recently filed court documents. The four plaintiffs, identified as South Carolina Doe, South Carolina Roe, New Jersey Doe, and Ohio Doe, alleged that the xAI's Grok chatbot was used to create deepfake sexualised images and was circulated. Among the four plaintiffs, one of them is a minor. This follows an uproar caused in January when scores of men likely used the Grok chatbot to create fake images of women, including children, “undressed” and in bikinis. According to an Analysis from the Centre for Countering Digital Hate, Grok was used to create 3 million sexualised images over just 11 days, among which 23,000 were potentially material of child sexual abuse. The analysis formed the evidentiary backbone of the litigation, demonstrating the lack of a guardrail in Musk's chatbot. In an affidavit on May 29, the four plaintiffs who filed the class-action lawsuit alleged that they faced emotional distress following the images were created. They further fear online harassment and doxing if their real names are used in the lawsuit. They worry about what their colleagues or employers would think if they saw those images. The South Carolina Doe said that she was “stripped down to a revealing bikini” and it shows her body “in a way that I would not ever share publicly.” Also Read: 'Ceasefire' is 'moderate shooting'- Trump says he won't resume full scale war if Tehran does not kill US troops “If I were forced to reveal my name publicly as part of this case, I would fear that those who support Elon Musk, his companies, and Grok, whom I have observed to be very vocal online, would find my name in the public record, disseminate it, dox me, and retaliate against me by creating additional and more extreme deepfakes of me,” read the filing as reported by Wired. “Having stripped them of their clothes, xAI now seeks to strip Plaintiffs of their pseudonyms in an obvious effort to intimidate Plaintiffs into dropping the litigation by compounding the same harms that they seek to remedy,” said Sophia Rios, a lawyer representing the individuals for the legal firm Berger Montague. A judge in the US District Court of Southern California allowed the complainant to use pseudonyms. But in May, xAI filed a motion with the federal court, urging them to disclose their names under civil court laws. Those who are suing the xAI have said that they will disclose the identity to the organisation but want to use the pseudonym publicly. xAI claims that there is a public interest in the identities of those who are suing the company. They further claim that since those deepfake images will not be made public as part of the case, this should allay any privacy concerns. “Factoring out the deepfake image itself—as it will remain under seal—there is nothing inherently stigmatising about revealing the fact that a deepfake image was created of South Carolina Doe without revealing the image itself,” the lawyers wrote in the May 15 filings. The lawyers of the complainant say that the images were “highly personal and embarrassing deepfakes depicting Plaintiffs that were disseminated without their consent.” They say that xAI's requests should be declined. According to the legal filing, all four pseudonyms of the claimants will drop out of the proceedings if their names are disclosed.

Elon Musk's xAI has asked a federal court to reveal the identities of four plaintiffs suing over Grok-generated sexualised deepfakes. The plaintiffs argue that disclosure could expose them to harassment and doxing.

xAI seeks identities of plaintiffs in Grok deepfake lawsuit involving sexualised images

grok-deepfakes

Grok Deepfakes, News on Grok Deepfakes, stories on Grok Deepfakes, articles on Grok Deepfakes, Grok Deepfakes stories at Wion, Grok Deepfakes news, Grok Deepfakes latest news

grok deepfakes

Elon Musk's xAI sues Minnesota over a law banning AI nude images of children, claims it violates free speech

xAI seeks identities of plaintiffs in Grok deepfake lawsuit of sexualised images