All India Majlis-e-Ittehad-ul-Muslimeen (AIMIM) party chief Asaduddin Owaisi on Saturday expressed dissatisfaction over the with the verdict in the Ayodhya title suit, quoting former Chief Justice JS Verma to say the Supreme Court was "indeed supreme, but not infallible".

All India Majlis-e-Ittehad-ul-Muslimeen (AIMIM) party chief Asaduddin Owaisi on Saturday expressed dissatisfaction over the with the verdict in the Ayodhya title suit, quoting former Chief Justice JS Verma to say the Supreme Court was "indeed supreme, but not infallible". The Hyderabad MP said that they he has full faith in the constitution. ''We were fighting for our right, we don't need 5 acre land as donation. We should reject this 5 acre land offer, don't patronize us,'' he said. Owaisi also attacked congress accusing it of deceitness and hypocrisy. Congress has shown their true colours,but for Congress party's deceitness and hypocrisy, idols would not have been placed in 1949, he said and added, had the locks not opened by Rajiv Gandhi the masjid would still be there,had Narasimha Rao discharged his duties the masjid would still be there. The Supreme Court of India on Sauturday delivered a historical verdict in the long overdue Ayodhya title case. In its verdict, the court asked the Centre to set up a Trust in three months and hand over the disputed land to the it to build the Ram Temple. The court also directed the Centre to hand over a suitable plot of land measuring 5 acres to Sunni Waqf Board for the construction of mosque.

Supreme Court is indeed supreme but not infallible: Asaduddin Owaisi on Ayodhya verdict

The Supreme Court Friday said that an appropriate bench constituted by it will pass an order on January 10 for fixing the date of hearing in the <a href="http://www.wionews.com/india-news/ayodhya-land-dispute-case-a-timeline-188184">Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid</a> land dispute title case at Ayodhya.

"Further orders will be passed by an appropriate bench on January 10 for fixing the date of hearing the matter," a bench comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice S K Kaul said.&nbsp;

An appropriate bench will pass an appropriate order, CJI Ranjan Gogoi said.&nbsp;

No sooner the matter came up, the CJI said it is the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case and went ahead with passing the order.

Senior advocates Harish Salve and Rajeev DhaVan, appearing for different parties, did not even get the opportunity to make any submission.

The hearing did not even last 30 seconds.&nbsp;

Now, a three-member bench will be set up for taking forward the Ayodhya land dispute case in which as many as 14 appeals were filed against the 2010 Allahabad High Court judgement, delivered in four civil suits, that the 2.77-acre land be partitioned equally among the three parties -- the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.

Various Hindutva organisations have been demanding an ordinance on early construction of Ram temple at the disputed site.

The hearing on Friday assumed importance as Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday had suggested any decision on an ordinance on Ram temple in Ayodhya can happen only after the completion of the judicial process.

(With PTI inputs)

The Supreme Court Friday said that an appropriate bench constituted by it will pass an order on January 10 for fixing the date of hearing in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute title case at Ayodhya.

The Supreme Court Friday said that an appropriate bench constituted by it will pass an order on January 10 for fixing the date of hearing in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute title case at Ayodhya. "Further orders will be passed by an appropriate bench on January 10 for fixing the date of hearing the matter," a bench comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice S K Kaul said. An appropriate bench will pass an appropriate order, CJI Ranjan Gogoi said. No sooner the matter came up, the CJI said it is the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case and went ahead with passing the order. Senior advocates Harish Salve and Rajeev DhaVan, appearing for different parties, did not even get the opportunity to make any submission. The hearing did not even last 30 seconds. Now, a three-member bench will be set up for taking forward the Ayodhya land dispute case in which as many as 14 appeals were filed against the 2010 Allahabad High Court judgement, delivered in four civil suits, that the 2.77-acre land be partitioned equally among the three parties -- the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla. Various Hindutva organisations have been demanding an ordinance on early construction of Ram temple at the disputed site. The hearing on Friday assumed importance as Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday had suggested any decision on an ordinance on Ram temple in Ayodhya can happen only after the completion of the judicial process. (With PTI inputs)

Appropriate bench to fix hearing date in Ayodhya land dispute case on January 10: Supreme Court

ayodhya-title-suit

Ayodhya Title Suit, News on Ayodhya Title Suit, stories on Ayodhya Title Suit, articles on Ayodhya Title Suit, Ayodhya Title Suit stories at Wion, Ayodhya Title Suit news, Ayodhya Title Suit latest news

ayodhya title-suit

Supreme Court is indeed supreme but not infallible: Asaduddin Owaisi on Ayodhya verdict

Appropriate bench to fix hearing date in Ayodhya land dispute case on January 10: Supreme Court