Israeli settlements does not help the peace process: Trump
President Trump has said he was still studying the case for relocating the US embassy to Jerusalem, a move that could anger the Arab world. Photograph: (Reuters)
US President Donald Trump called on "Israel to be reasonable with respect to peace", spelling out in his own words his administration's stance that new settlements on Palestinian land may not be helpful in an interview to an Israeli newspaper.
Trump's comments to newspaper Israel Today come as he tones down his pro-Israel bravado ahead of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's trip to the White House on February 15.
"I want Israel to be reasonable with respect to peace. I want to see peace happen," Trump said in the interview published on Friday. "I would like to see a level of reasonableness of both parties, and I think we have a good chance of doing that."
During his 2016 election campaign, Trump signalled his presidency would be a boon for Israel and tough on Palestinians. He talked of moving the US embassy to Jerusalem, naming an ambassador who backs Israel's settlement programme and exerting no pressure on Israel for peace talks.
Now Trump is adopting a more measured stance. Even though the White House did not join the widespread criticism this week of a new Israeli law which retroactively legalises about 4,000 existing settler homes, its pro-Israel approach shows signs of being more nuanced.
"They [settlements] don't help the process. I can say that," Trump told the Israeli daily owned by US casino mogul Sheldon Adelson, a Netanyahu supporter and Republican party donor.
"Every time you take land for settlements, there is less land left," Trump said. "I am not somebody that believes that going forward with these settlements is a good thing for peace."
The president said his administration was "looking at some other options" regarding the settlements.
He also said he was still studying the case for relocating the US embassy to Jerusalem, a move that could anger the Arab world.
"The embassy is not an easy decision. It has obviously been out there for many, many years, and nobody has wanted to make that decision. I'm thinking about it very seriously, and we will see what happens," Trump said.
Meanwhile, Trump continued his tirade to bring back the travel ban denouncing as "disgraceful" an appellate court's decision blocking his controversial ban on refugees and nationals from seven Muslim-majority countries.
Referring to a portion of an article written on the national security blog Lawfare, which highlights a statute that the author says the judges failed to cite, Trump tweeted: "LAWFARE: 'Remarkably, in the entire opinion, the panel did not bother even to cite this (the) statute.' A disgraceful decision!"
LAWFARE: "Remarkably, in the entire opinion, the panel did not bother even to cite this (the) statute." A disgraceful decision!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 10, 2017
Lawfare is a legal blog that covers the intersection of national security and the legal world. Its website reads that it is published in cooperation with the Brookings Institution, a well-known Washington think tank, Politico reported.
The post Trump referred to breaks down the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling upholding a stay on the president's executive order temporarily banning individuals from certain majority-Muslim nations from entering the US.
The White House has vowed to continue to fight for the orders and has expressed confidence that they will ultimately be upheld in court.
(WION with Reuters, PTI inputs)